Model Misspecification: Contrasting Formative and Reflective Indicators for a Model of E-Service Quality

This paper discusses the managerial and theoretical implications of model misspecification-specifically, formative versus reflective construct conceptualization, measurement, and modeling of e-service quality. Service quality has a long history of using reflective indicators in its conceptualization. Recently, researchers have started to question the traditional conceptualization by noting that service quality may be better represented by formative rather than reflective indicators. We undertook a study of e-service quality and analyzed the data using a formative conceptualization, as well as a traditional reflective conceptualization. The results of our comparison demonstrated very different managerial conclusions for the two specifications. Thus, we conclude that the issue of model specification is a topic that needs more attention in the academic community due to the potentially flawed managerial conclusions that can result from model misspecification.

[1]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[2]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Multidimensional Constructs M Structural Equation Analysis: An Illustration Using the Job Perception and Job Satisfaction Constructs , 1999 .

[3]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[4]  R. MacCallum,et al.  The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  E-S-QUAL A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality , 2004 .

[6]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[7]  Carol C. Bienstock,et al.  Measuring Service Quality in E-Retailing , 2006 .

[8]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Webqual(tm): a web site quality instrument , 2000 .

[9]  J. Mentzer,et al.  Logistics Service Quality as a Segment-Customized Process , 2001 .

[10]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Some New Thoughts on Conceptualizing Perceived Service Quality: A Hierarchical Approach , 2001 .

[11]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[12]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement , 1982 .

[13]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[14]  Carol C. Bienstock,et al.  Measuring physical distribution service quality , 1997 .

[15]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing , 1998 .

[16]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[17]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Gordon C. Bruner,et al.  Multi-item scale usage in marketing journals: 1980 to 1989 , 1993 .

[19]  M. Gilly,et al.  eTailQ: dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting etail quality , 2003 .

[20]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .