Balanced-PCR amplification allows unbiased identification of genomic copy changes in minute cell and tissue samples.

Analysis of genomic DNA derived from cells and fresh or fixed tissues often requires whole genome amplification prior to microarray screening. Technical hurdles to this process are the introduction of amplification bias and/or the inhibitory effects of formalin fixation on DNA amplification. Here we demonstrate a balanced-PCR procedure that allows unbiased amplification of genomic DNA from fresh or modestly degraded paraffin-embedded DNA samples. Following digestion and ligation of a target and a control genome with distinct linkers, the two are mixed and amplified in a single PCR, thereby avoiding biases associated with PCR saturation and impurities. We demonstrate genome-wide retention of allelic differences following balanced-PCR amplification of DNA from breast cancer and normal human cells and genomic profiling by array-CGH (cDNA arrays, 100 kb resolution) and by real-time PCR (single gene resolution). Comparison of balanced-PCR with multiple displacement amplification (MDA) demonstrates equivalent performance between the two when intact genomic DNA is used. When DNA from paraffin-embedded samples is used, balanced PCR overcomes problems associated with modest DNA degradation and produces unbiased amplification whereas MDA does not. Balanced-PCR allows amplification and recovery of modestly degraded genomic DNA for subsequent retrospective analysis of human tumors with known outcomes.

[1]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Laser Capture Microdissection , 1996, Science.

[2]  A. Syvänen,et al.  Quantitative evaluation by minisequencing and microarrays reveals accurate multiplexed SNP genotyping of whole genome amplified DNA. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  Daniel Pinkel,et al.  Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH. , 2003, Genome research.

[4]  Yuzhi Zhang,et al.  A PCR-based amplification method retaining the quantitative difference between two complex genomes , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  J. Izbicki,et al.  SCOMP is superior to degenerated oligonucleotide primed-polymerase chain reaction for global amplification of minute amounts of DNA from microdissected archival tissue samples. , 2002, The American journal of pathology.

[6]  M. Rubin.  Understanding Disease Cell by Cell , 2002, Science.

[7]  S. Kingsmore,et al.  Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  T. Powles,et al.  The feasibility of using fine needle aspiration from primary breast cancers for cDNA microarray analyses. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[9]  Trevor L Hawkins,et al.  Whole genome amplification--applications and advances. , 2002, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[10]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Real-Time Quantitative PCR , 2002 .

[11]  T. Visakorpi,et al.  Amplification of EIF3S3 gene is associated with advanced stage in prostate cancer. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[12]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[13]  A. Ashworth,et al.  Microarray and histopathological analysis of tumours: the future and the past? , 2001, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  M. Mathieu,et al.  c‐erbB‐2 (HER‐2/neu) gene amplification is a better indicator of poor prognosis than protein over‐expression in operable breast‐cancer patients , 2001, International journal of cancer.

[15]  H. Moch,et al.  Discovery of new DNA amplification loci in prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization * , 2001, The Prostate.

[16]  D. Ward,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization of fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas , 2000, International journal of cancer.

[17]  Y. Chen,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of 38 breast cancer cell lines: a basis for interpreting complementary DNA microarray data. , 2000, Cancer research.

[18]  W. Kuo,et al.  Quantitative mapping of amplicon structure by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[19]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[20]  M. Speicher,et al.  Comparative genomic hybridization, loss of heterozygosity, and DNA sequence analysis of single cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  W. Kuo,et al.  High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[22]  J W Gray,et al.  Genetic analysis using genomic representations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  M. Dasso,et al.  The human RAE1 gene is a functional homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rae1 gene involved in nuclear export of Poly(A)+ RNA. , 1997, Gene.

[24]  H. Höfler,et al.  Laser-assisted preparation of single cells from stained histological slides for gene analysis , 1997, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[25]  V G Cheung,et al.  Whole genome amplification using a degenerate oligonucleotide primer allows hundreds of genotypes to be performed on less than one nanogram of genomic DNA. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Aaron P. Campbell,et al.  Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  T. Visakorpi,et al.  Genetic changes in primary and recurrent prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1995, Cancer research.

[28]  J Piper,et al.  Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  D. Pinkel,et al.  Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors , 2022 .

[30]  R. Hubert,et al.  Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  R. Abramson,et al.  Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5'----3' exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  D. Ledbetter,et al.  Alu polymerase chain reaction: a method for rapid isolation of human-specific sequences from complex DNA sources. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.