Exoplanetary atmosphere target selection in the era of comparative planetology

Large-scale transit surveys such as NGTS, TESS and PLATO promise to deliver a wealth of potential targets for follow-up transmission spectroscopy study. This will usher in an era of comparative planetology that will be limited not by a paucity of targets but by the scarcity of follow-up assets on the ground and in space. It will become crucial to ensure that the selection of targets is matched carefully against the availability and capability of follow-up telescopes. We propose a metric-based target selection approach that relies only on primary transit observables. The metric can be easily deployed within a distributed heterogeneous network of telescopes equipped to undertake either broadband photometry or spectroscopy. We show how the metric can be used either to optimise the observing strategy for a given telescope (e.g. choice of filter) or to enable the selection of the best telescope to optimise the overall sample size. The metric can also provide the basis for a selection function to help evaluate the statistical completeness of follow-up transmission spectroscopy datasets. Finally, we validate our metric by comparing its ranked set of targets against planets which have had their atmospheres successfully probed. We also compare the target list selected by our metric against some existing prioritised exoplanet lists.

[1]  Nikolay Nikolov,et al.  A library of ATMO forward model transmission spectra for hot Jupiter exoplanets , 2017, 1710.10269.

[2]  Gregory S. Tucker,et al.  The Transiting Exoplanet Community Early Release Science Program for JWST , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[3]  David J Armstrong,et al.  WASP-86b and WASP-102b: super-dense versus bloated planets , 2016, 1608.04225.

[4]  Jacob L. Bean,et al.  An HST/WFC3 Thermal Emission Spectrum of the Hot Jupiter HAT-P-7b , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[5]  Edward Gillen,et al.  The Next Generation Transit Survey (NGTS) , 2018 .

[6]  G. Nowak,et al.  The GTC exoplanet transit spectroscopy survey , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[7]  Ryan Cloutier,et al.  Quantifying the Observational Effort Required for the Radial Velocity Characterization of TESS Planets , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[8]  Jacob L. Bean,et al.  Global Climate and Atmospheric Composition of the Ultra-hot Jupiter WASP-103b from HST and Spitzer Phase Curve Observations , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[9]  Tyler Robinson,et al.  Observing the Atmospheres of Known Temperate Earth-sized Planets with JWST , 2017, 1708.04239.

[10]  Robert T. Zellem,et al.  A Framework for Prioritizing the TESS Planetary Candidates Most Amenable to Atmospheric Characterization , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[11]  D. Ehrenreich,et al.  Hubble PanCET: an isothermal day-side atmosphere for the bloated gas-giant HAT-P-32Ab , 2017, 1711.00859.