Extended Stokes Shift in Fluorescent Proteins: Chromophore–Protein Interactions in a Near-Infrared TagRFP675 Variant

Most GFP-like fluorescent proteins exhibit small Stokes shifts (10–45 nm) due to rigidity of the chromophore environment that excludes non-fluorescent relaxation to a ground state. An unusual near-infrared derivative of the red fluorescent protein mKate, named TagRFP675, exhibits the Stokes shift, which is 30 nm extended comparing to that of the parental protein. In physiological conditions, TagRFP675 absorbs at 598 nm and emits at 675 nm that makes it the most red-shifted protein of the GFP-like protein family. In addition, its emission maximum strongly depends on the excitation wavelength. Structures of TagRFP675 revealed the common DsRed-like chromophore, which, however, interacts with the protein matrix via an extensive network of hydrogen bonds capable of large flexibility. Based on the spectroscopic, biochemical, and structural analysis we suggest that the rearrangement of the hydrogen bond interactions between the chromophore and the protein matrix is responsible for the TagRFP675 spectral properties.

[1]  D. Bourgeois,et al.  Reverse pH-dependence of chromophore protonation explains the large Stokes shift of the red fluorescent protein mKeima. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Vladislav V Verkhusha,et al.  Directed molecular evolution to design advanced red fluorescent proteins , 2011, Nature Methods.

[3]  Roberto A Chica,et al.  Generation of longer emission wavelength red fluorescent proteins using computationally designed libraries , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Stefan W. Hell,et al.  A Rapidly Maturing Far-Red Derivative of DsRed-Express2 for Whole-Cell Labeling , 2009, Biochemistry.

[5]  S. Remington,et al.  Excited state proton transfer in the red fluorescent protein mKeima. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Michael Z. Lin,et al.  Autofluorescent proteins with excitation in the optical window for intravital imaging in mammals. , 2009, Chemistry & biology.

[7]  D. Shcherbo,et al.  Bright far-red fluorescent protein for whole-body imaging , 2007, Nature Methods.

[8]  Vladislav V Verkhusha,et al.  Engineering ESPT pathways based on structural analysis of LSSmKate red fluorescent proteins with large Stokes shift. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  A. Demchenko Site-selective Red-Edge effects. , 2008, Methods in enzymology.

[10]  Randy J Read,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Likelihood-enhanced Fast Rotation Functions Biological Crystallography Likelihood-enhanced Fast Rotation Functions , 2003 .

[11]  S. Boxer,et al.  Dynamic Stokes shift in green fluorescent protein variants , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  J. Lakowicz Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy , 1983 .

[13]  Vincent B. Chen,et al.  Correspondence e-mail: , 2000 .

[14]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  X. Shu,et al.  Unique interactions between the chromophore and glutamate 16 lead to far‐red emission in a red fluorescent protein , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[16]  Dmitriy M Chudakov,et al.  Conversion of red fluorescent protein into a bright blue probe. , 2008, Chemistry & biology.

[17]  V. Verkhusha,et al.  Guide to red fluorescent proteins and biosensors for flow cytometry. , 2011, Methods in cell biology.

[18]  V. Subramaniam,et al.  Three photoconvertible forms of green fluorescent protein identified by spectral hole-burning , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[19]  S J Remington,et al.  Structural basis of spectral shifts in the yellow-emission variants of green fluorescent protein. , 1998, Structure.

[20]  Kami Kim,et al.  Bright and stable near infra-red fluorescent protein for in vivo imaging , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Nathan C Shaner,et al.  Novel chromophores and buried charges control color in mFruits. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[22]  Bin Wu,et al.  Modern fluorescent proteins and imaging technologies to study gene expression, nuclear localization, and dynamics. , 2011, Current opinion in cell biology.

[23]  Kevin Cowtan,et al.  research papers Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2005 .

[24]  A. Wlodawer,et al.  Structural basis for bathochromic shift of fluorescence in far-red fluorescent proteins eqFP650 and eqFP670. , 2012, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[25]  Joerg Bewersdorf,et al.  Far-red fluorescent protein excitable with red lasers for flow cytometry and superresolution STED nanoscopy. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[26]  S. Lukyanov,et al.  Fluorescent proteins and their applications in imaging living cells and tissues. , 2010, Physiological reviews.

[27]  Alexander P Demchenko,et al.  The red-edge effects: 30 years of exploration. , 2002, Luminescence : the journal of biological and chemical luminescence.

[28]  Sidney Udenfriend,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF FLUORESCENCE , 1969 .

[29]  Kristin L. Hazelwood,et al.  Far-red fluorescent tags for protein imaging in living tissues. , 2009, The Biochemical journal.

[30]  A. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Wavelength-selective fluorescence as a novel tool to study organization and dynamics in complex biological systems , 1995, Journal of Fluorescence.

[31]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[32]  K Henrick,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions Biological Crystallography Secondary-structure Matching (ssm), a New Tool for Fast Protein Structure Alignment in Three Dimensions , 2022 .

[33]  S. Meech,et al.  Excited state reactions in fluorescent proteins. , 2009, Chemical Society reviews.

[34]  V. Verkhusha,et al.  Engineering of bacterial phytochromes for near-infrared imaging, sensing, and light-control in mammals. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[35]  Konstantin A Lukyanov,et al.  Near-infrared fluorescent proteins , 2010, Nature Methods.

[36]  Bin Wu,et al.  Monomeric red fluorescent proteins with a large Stokes shift , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  S. Meech,et al.  Electronic spectroscopy and solvatochromism in the chromophore of GFP and the Y66F mutant , 2007, Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology.

[38]  W. Zipfel,et al.  Molecular Mechanism of a Green-Shifted, pH-Dependent Red Fluorescent Protein mKate Variant , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  Vladislav V Verkhusha,et al.  Chromophore transformations in red fluorescent proteins. , 2012, Chemical reviews.

[40]  N. A. Nemkovich,et al.  Localized excitation effect on dipole moments of oligophenylenevinylenes in their excited Franck–Condon state , 2010 .

[41]  N. A. Nemkovich,et al.  Inhomogeneous Broadening of Electronic Spectra of Dye Molecules in Solutions , 2002 .

[42]  R. Tsien,et al.  Evolution of new nonantibody proteins via iterative somatic hypermutation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Zbigniew Dauter,et al.  A Crystallographic Study of Bright Far-Red Fluorescent Protein mKate Reveals pH-induced cis-trans Isomerization of the Chromophore* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  V. Verkhusha,et al.  Advances in engineering of fluorescent proteins and photoactivatable proteins with red emission. , 2010, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology.

[45]  P. Goodwin,et al.  Photophysics of the red chromophore of HcRed: evidence for cis-trans isomerization and protonation-state changes. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.