Inducing Bystander Interventions During Robot Abuse with Social Mechanisms

We explored whether a robot can leverage social influences to motivate nearby bystanders to intervene and defend them from human abuse. We designed a between-subjects study where 48 participants took part in a memorization task and observed a confederate mistreating a robot both verbally and physically. The robot was either empathetic towards the participant»s performance in the task or indifferent. When the robot was mistreated, it ignored the abuse, shut down in response to it, or reacted emotionally. We found that the majority of the participants intervened to help the robot after it was abused. Interventions happened for a wide range of reasons. Interestingly, the empathetic robot increased the proportion of participants that self-reported intervening in comparison to the indifferent robot, but more participants moved the robot as a response to abuse in the latter case. The participants also perceived the robot being verbally mistreated more and reported higher levels of personal distress when the robot briefly shut down after abuse in comparison to when it reacted emotionally or did not react at all.

[1]  C. Salmivalli,et al.  Participant role approach to school bullying: implications for interventions. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[2]  Jamie Poston,et al.  Too big to be mistreated? Examining the role of robot size on perceptions of mistreatment , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[3]  J. Rubin,et al.  Experimental research on third-party intervention in conflict: toward some generalizations. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Care-receiving robot as a tool of teachers in child education , 2010 .

[5]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Why Do Children Abuse Robots? , 2015, HRI.

[6]  Ana Paiva,et al.  The influence of empathy in human-robot relations , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  D. Pepler,et al.  Peer involvement in bullying: insights and challenges for intervention. , 1999, Journal of adolescence.

[8]  Kelly Caine,et al.  Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI , 2016, CHI.

[9]  Sonya S. Kwak,et al.  What makes people empathize with an emotional robot?: The impact of agency and physical embodiment on human empathy for a robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[10]  J. Stoker,et al.  The Department of Health and Human Services. , 1999, Home healthcare nurse.

[11]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  Emulating Empathy in Socially Assistive Robotics , 2007, AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics.

[12]  C. Bartneck,et al.  Robot abuse : a limitation of the media equation , 2005 .

[13]  T. Kanda,et al.  Why do children abuse robots , 2016 .

[14]  W. Stroup Generalized Linear Mixed Models: Modern Concepts, Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[15]  T. Pigott,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Bullying Prevention Programs' Effects on Bystander Intervention Behavior , 2012 .

[16]  D. Pepler,et al.  Naturalistic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying , 2001 .

[17]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[18]  Paolo Dario,et al.  How safe are service robots in urban environments? Bullying a robot , 2010, 19th International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[19]  John-Jules Ch. Meyer,et al.  Adaptive Emotional Expression in Robot-Child Interaction , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[20]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[21]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  An Experimental Study on Emotional Reactions Towards a Robot , 2012, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[22]  Kolja Kühnlenz,et al.  Improving aspects of empathy and subjective performance for HRI through mirroring facial expressions , 2011, RO-MAN.

[23]  Edwin Olson,et al.  AprilTag: A robust and flexible visual fiducial system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[24]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Modelling empathic behaviour in a robotic game companion for children: An ethnographic study in real-world settings , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[25]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  To kill a mockingbird robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[27]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[28]  Peter Robinson,et al.  When my robot smiles at me Enabling human-robot rapport via real-time head gesture mimicry , 2009 .

[29]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Escaping from Children’s Abuse of Social Robots , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[30]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[31]  Adriana Tapus,et al.  Socially Assistive Robots: The Link between Personality, Empathy, Physiological Signals, and Task Performance , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Emotion, Personality, and Social Behavior.

[32]  Jun Hu,et al.  Exploring the abuse of robots , 2008 .