SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope

Changes in the transcriptional state of genes have been correlated with their repositioning within the nuclear space. Tethering reporter genes to the nuclear envelope alone can impose repression and recent reports have shown that, after activation, certain genes can also be found closer to the nuclear periphery. The molecular mechanisms underlying these phenomena have remained elusive. Here, with the use of dynamic three-dimensional tracking of a single locus in live yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells, we show that the activation of GAL genes (GAL7, GAL10 and GAL1) leads to a confinement in dynamic motility. We demonstrate that the GAL locus is subject to sub-diffusive movement, which after activation can become constrained to a two-dimensional sliding motion along the nuclear envelope. RNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis after activation reveals a higher transcriptional activity for the peripherally constrained GAL genes than for loci remaining intranuclear. This confinement was mediated by Sus1 and Ada2, members of the SAGA histone acetyltransferase complex, and Sac3, a messenger RNA export factor, physically linking the activated GAL genes to the nuclear-pore-complex component Nup1. Deleting ADA2 or NUP1 abrogates perinuclear GAL confinement without affecting GAL1 transcription. Accordingly, transcriptional activation is necessary but not sufficient for the confinement of GAL genes at the nuclear periphery. The observed real-time dynamic mooring of active GAL genes to the inner side of the nuclear pore complex is in accordance with the ‘gene gating’ hypothesis.

[1]  Pamela A Silver,et al.  Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes. , 2005, Genes & development.

[2]  F. Winston,et al.  The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4. , 2001, Genes & development.

[3]  Oreto Antúnez,et al.  Sus1, a Functional Component of the SAGA Histone Acetylase Complex and the Nuclear Pore-Associated mRNA Export Machinery , 2004, Cell.

[4]  D. Spector,et al.  The dynamics of chromosome organization and gene regulation. , 2003, Annual review of biochemistry.

[5]  Tamás Fischer,et al.  The mRNA export machinery requires the novel Sac3p–Thp1p complex to dock at the nucleoplasmic entrance of the nuclear pores , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[6]  O. Gadal,et al.  Nuclear Retention of Unspliced mRNAs in Yeast Is Mediated by Perinuclear Mlp1 , 2004, Cell.

[7]  K. Nasmyth,et al.  Cohesins: Chromosomal Proteins that Prevent Premature Separation of Sister Chromatids , 1997, Cell.

[8]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications , 1990 .

[9]  R. Sternglanz,et al.  Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing , 1998, Nature.

[10]  John W. Sedat,et al.  Multiple regimes of constrained chromosome motion are regulated in the interphase Drosophila nucleus , 2001, Current Biology.

[11]  Tamás Fischer,et al.  Yeast centrin Cdc31 is linked to the nuclear mRNA export machinery , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[12]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  The transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II in living cells , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  J. Quastel.  Diffusion in Disordered Media , 1996 .

[14]  B. Andrews,et al.  Reverse recruitment: the Nup84 nuclear pore subcomplex mediates Rap1/Gcr1/Gcr2 transcriptional activation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  H. Scherthan,et al.  The clustering of telomeres and colocalization with Rap1, Sir3, and Sir4 proteins in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  M. Green,et al.  SAGA is an essential in vivo target of the yeast acidic activator Gal4p. , 2001, Genes & development.

[17]  G. Blobel,et al.  Gene gating: a hypothesis. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Eka Swadiansa.  The hypothesis , 1990 .

[19]  B. Andrews,et al.  Reverse recruitment : The Nup 84 nuclear pore subcomplex mediates Rap 1 Gcr 1 Gcr 2 transcriptional activation , 2005 .

[20]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Genome-Wide Localization of the Nuclear Transport Machinery Couples Transcriptional Status and Nuclear Organization , 2004, Cell.

[21]  P. Walter,et al.  Gene Recruitment of the Activated INO1 Locus to the Nuclear Membrane , 2004, PLoS biology.

[22]  B. Pugh,et al.  A genome-wide housekeeping role for TFIID and a highly regulated stress-related role for SAGA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, Molecular cell.