Words are not just words: the social acquisition of abstract words

Language is usually considered as a set of arbitrar y symbols that convey subjacent internal concepts. According to this traditional ap proach words are only words, mere external signals of internal processes. In contrast , we propose that Words are social Tools (WAT). This view allows us address one of the criti cal problems embodied views face, the problem of how abstract words are acquired and represented. Indeed, we argue that the role of sensorimotor engagement varies depending on the considered domain. In the case of the acquisition of concrete word meanings, categories a re grounded primarily in perception and action systems, and linguistic labels contribute in constraining the boundaries of grounded categories. In the use of abstract words, the oppos ite mechanism might be adopted. Abstract words are more difficult to learn because they acti vate a much more complex set of situations, objects, human activities and so on. Th e linguistic labels help us group and assemble this variety of experiences. In addition, diversity of languages has more of an impact on abstract words as opposed to concrete word meaning.

[1]  A. Clark,et al.  Introduction: Mind Embodied, Embedded, Enacted: One Church or Many? , 2009 .

[2]  Miao‐kun Sun,et al.  Trends in cognitive sciences , 2012 .

[3]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  What thoughts are made of , 2008 .

[4]  P. Gordon Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[5]  A. Paivio Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[6]  Mareike M. Menz,et al.  Grasping language – A short story on embodiment , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  A. Clark Supersizing the Mind , 2008 .

[8]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Sentence Processing: Linking Language to Motor Chains , 2010, Front. Neurorobot..

[9]  S. Carey The child as word learner , 1978 .

[10]  Xiaoping P. Hu,et al.  fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[11]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[12]  L. Gleitman,et al.  When we think about thinking: The acquisition of belief verbs , 2007, Cognition.

[13]  A. Clark Magic Words: How Language Augments Human Computation , 1998 .

[14]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  The embodiment of power and communalism in space and bodily contact , 2008 .

[15]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  S. Crain,et al.  Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[17]  Lucia Riggio,et al.  Abstract and Concrete Sentences, Embodiment, and Languages , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[18]  L. Boroditsky Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  D. Marocco,et al.  Manipulating Objects and Telling Words: A Study on Concrete and Abstract Words Acquisition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[20]  D. Fayuk,et al.  The Journal of Physiology , 1978, Medical History.

[21]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.

[22]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  The Two-Level Theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system , 2010, Brain and Language.

[23]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Situating Abstract Concepts , 2004 .

[24]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Qualitative differences in the representation of abstract versus concrete words: Evidence from the visual-world paradigm , 2009, Cognition.

[25]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror neuron system. , 2009, Archives of neurology.

[27]  C. J. McGrath,et al.  Effect of exchange rate return on volatility spill-over across trading regions , 2012 .

[28]  P. Wolff,et al.  Words and the mind : how words capture human experience , 2010 .

[29]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[30]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. , 2004 .

[31]  J. Altarriba,et al.  Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[32]  D. Parisi,et al.  Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool , 2011 .

[33]  A. W. Ellis,et al.  Traces of vocabulary acquisition in the brain: Evidence from covert object naming , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  Time in the mind: Using space to think about time , 2008, Cognition.

[35]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Talking About Walking , 2008, Psychological science.

[36]  Maurizio Gentilucci,et al.  Object motor representation and language , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  Max M. Louwerse,et al.  A Taste of Words: Linguistic Context and Perceptual Simulation Predict the Modality of Words , 2011, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  S. Levinson,et al.  Can language restructure cognition? The case for space , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  J. Mandler,et al.  Early Sensitivity to Language-Specific Spatial Categories in English and Korean , 1999 .

[41]  J. Elman An alternative view of the mental lexicon , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  A. Goldman,et al.  Is social cognition embodied? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  F. Keil Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development , 1989 .

[44]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language , 2008, Current Biology.

[45]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[47]  P. Hagoort,et al.  Language beyond action , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[48]  J. Mehler,et al.  LANGUAGE AND COGNITION , 1998 .

[49]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  What's "up" with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Universality and language specificity in object naming , 2003 .

[51]  A. Clark Material Symbols , 2006 .

[52]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[53]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Modulation of the semantic system by word imageability , 2005, NeuroImage.

[54]  Piotr Winkielman,et al.  Embodied Grounding Social , Cognitive , Affective , and Neuroscientific Approaches , 2009 .

[55]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  The Adaptive Advantage of Symbolic Theft Over Sensorimotor Toil: Grounding Language in Perceptual Categories , 2001 .

[56]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article THE EFFECT OF IMPLIED ORIENTATION DERIVED FROM VERBAL CONTEXT ON PICTURE RECOGNITION , 2022 .

[57]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  The symbol detachment problem , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[58]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Introduction to the Special Topic Embodied and Grounded Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[59]  B McGhee-Bidlack,et al.  The development of noun definitions: a metalinguistic analysis , 1991, Journal of Child Language.

[60]  A. Chatterjee Disembodying cognition , 2010, Language and Cognition.

[61]  Guy Dove Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism , 2009, Cognition.

[62]  E. Warrington,et al.  Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[63]  Stephen J. Flusberg,et al.  A Connectionist Approach to Embodied Conceptual Metaphor , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[64]  Lawrence W Barsalou,et al.  Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[65]  J. Austin How to do things with words , 1962 .

[66]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain mechanisms linking language and action , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[67]  D. Chalmers Consciousness and Cognition , 1990 .

[68]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Grounding Cognition: Introduction to Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking , 2005 .

[69]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[70]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Cultural route to the emergence of linguistic categories , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  M. Halliday Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning , 1976 .

[72]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Numbers in Space: Differences between Concrete and Abstract Situations , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[73]  W. Prinz Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[74]  J. Mandler Thought before language , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  P. Wolff,et al.  Causers in English, Korean, and Chinese and the individuation of events , 2009, Language and Cognition.

[76]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language acquisition and conceptual development: Individuation, relativity, and early word learning , 2001 .

[77]  J. Prinz Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis , 2004 .

[78]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Processing Abstract Language Modulates Motor System Activity , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[79]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Language and the Origin of Numerical Concepts , 2004, Science.

[80]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series How language acquisition builds on cognitive development , 2004 .

[81]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Knowing versus Naming: Similarity and the Linguistic Categorization of Artifacts , 1999 .

[82]  W. Brogden Annual Review of Psychology , 1957 .

[83]  A. Borghi Grounding Cognition: Object Concepts and Action , 2005 .

[84]  G. Miller,et al.  Linguistic theory and psychological reality , 1982 .

[85]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[86]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought , 2002, Psychological science.

[87]  C. Frith,et al.  Language as a Tool for Interacting Minds , 2010 .

[88]  V. Gallese Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[89]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[90]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[91]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review , 2007, Brain and Language.

[92]  Patrick Jeuniaux,et al.  Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic , 2008 .

[93]  Mirko Farina Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. , 2010 .

[94]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[95]  A. Borghi,et al.  Embodied cognition and beyond: Acting and sensing the body , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[96]  A. Tellings,et al.  Mode of acquisition of word meanings: The viability of a theoretical construct , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[97]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Embodied experience and linguistic meaning , 2003, Brain and Language.