A multi-objective formulation to estimate dynamic equivalents

This paper proposes a technique to estimate the dynamic equivalent generators' parameters. The application is formulated as a multi-objective problem, which is solved as an evolutionary algorithm. Two objective functions are used with the purpose of preserving those angular velocities (ω) and electrical powers (Pe) associated to generators at the internal region. In order to contribute to the solution, information stemming from Phasor Measurement Units (PMU) is assumed. These measurements are allocated in specific positions. Results are exhibited on an equivalent of the Mexican interconnected network.

[1]  Romeu Reginatto,et al.  A software tool for the determination of dynamic equivalents of power systems , 2010, 2010 IREP Symposium Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - VIII (IREP).

[2]  A. M. Miah.  Study of a coherency-based simple dynamic equivalent for transient stability assessment , 2011 .

[3]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  Tao Wang,et al.  An Elman Neural Network Application on Dynamic Equivalents of Power System , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering.

[5]  O. Anaya-Lara,et al.  Identification of the dynamic equivalent of a power system , 2009, 2009 44th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC).

[6]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Review of reduction techniques in the determination of composite system adequacy equivalents , 2010 .

[7]  Eduardo J. S. Pires de Souza.  Stable equivalent models with minimum phase transfer functions in the dynamic aggregation of voltage , 2011 .

[8]  Bogdan Marinescu,et al.  Dynamic equivalent of neighbor power system for day-ahead stability studies , 2010, 2010 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference Europe (ISGT Europe).

[9]  J.M. Ramfirez,et al.  A technique to reduce power systems electromechanical models , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[10]  L. Rouco,et al.  Large-Scale Power System Dynamic Equivalents Based on Standard and Border Synchrony , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Eduardo J.S. Pires de Souza.  Identification of coherent generators considering the electrical proximity for drastic dynamic equivalents , 2008 .

[12]  Pawel Gepner,et al.  Multi-Core Processors: New Way to Achieve High System Performance , 2006, PARELEC.

[13]  A. M. Gole,et al.  Dynamic system equivalents: A survey of available techniques , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[14]  G Hamed Shakouri,et al.  Identification of a continuous time nonlinear state space model for the external power system dynamic equivalent by neural networks , 2009 .

[15]  Victor H. Benitez,et al.  Dynamic Equivalents by RHONN , 2007 .

[16]  H. H. Happ,et al.  Power System Control and Stability , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  J. M. R. Arredondo,et al.  An optimal power system model order reduction technique , 2004 .

[18]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  A Measurement-Based Framework for Dynamic Equivalencing of Large Power Systems Using Wide-Area Phasor Measurements , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[19]  Enrico Elio De Tuglie,et al.  Dynamic identification of external equivalents in distribution networks , 2011 .

[20]  Sunita Halder nee Dey,et al.  An innovative technique to evaluate network equivalent for voltage stability assessment in a widespread sub-grid system , 2011 .

[21]  Zhou Yang,et al.  Study of Coherency-based Dynamic Equivalent Method for Power System with HVDC , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering.