An integrated approach to sensor FDI and signal reconstruction in HTGRs. Part I. Theoretical framework

Abstract Sensor fault detection and isolation (FDI) is an important element in modern nuclear power plant (NPP) diagnostic systems. In this respect, sensor FDI of generation II and III water-cooled nuclear energy systems has become an active research topic to continually improve levels of reliability, safety, and operation. However, evolutionary advances in reactor and component technology together with different energy conversion methodologies support the investigation of alternative approaches to sensor FDI. Within this context, the basic aim of this two part series is to propose, implement and evaluate an integrated approach for sensor FDI and signal reconstruction in generation IV nuclear high temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs). In part I of this two part series, the methodology and theoretical background of the integrated sensor FDI and signal reconstruction approach are given. This approach combines techniques such as non-temporal parity space analysis (PSA), principal component analysis (PCA), sensor fusion and fuzzy decision systems to form a more powerful sensor FDI methodology that exploits the strengths of the individual techniques. An illustrative example of the PCA algorithm is given making use of actual data retrieved from a pilot plant called the pebble bed micro model (PBMM). This is a prototype gas turbine power plant based on the first design configuration of the pebble bed modular reactor (PBMR). In part II, the described integrated sensor fault detection approach will be evaluated by means of two case studies. In the first case study the approach will be evaluated on real PBMM data and in the second case study the approach will be evaluated on a highly detailed Flownex® model of the new generation PBMR.

[1]  Paul M. Frank,et al.  Fault diagnosis in dynamic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy: A survey and some new results , 1990, Autom..

[2]  S. C. Lee,et al.  Sensor value validation based on systematic exploration of the sensor redundancy for fault diagnosis KBS , 1994, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  G. van Schoor,et al.  Enthalpy–entropy graph approach for the classification of faults in the main power system of a closed Brayton cycle HTGR , 2009 .

[4]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Nuclear Power Plant Components Condition Monitoring by Probabilistic Support Vector Machine , 2013 .

[5]  S. Qin,et al.  Determining the number of principal components for best reconstruction , 2000 .

[6]  Kai Goebel,et al.  Sensor validation and fusion for gas turbine vibration monitoring , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[7]  A. Willsky,et al.  Analytical redundancy and the design of robust failure detection systems , 1984 .

[8]  Sirkka-Liisa Jämsä-Jounela,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis approach based on nonlinear parity equations and its application to leakages and blockages in the drying section of a board machine , 2013 .

[9]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  A methodology for intelligent sensor measurement, validation, fusion, and fault detection for equipment monitoring and diagnostics , 2001, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[10]  Gilles Mourot,et al.  An improved PCA scheme for sensor FDI: Application to an air quality monitoring network , 2006 .

[11]  Paul M. Frank,et al.  Issues of Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems , 2010, Springer London.

[12]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Joint diagnosis of process and sensor faults using principal component analysis , 1998 .

[13]  Inseok Hwang,et al.  A Survey of Fault Detection, Isolation, and Reconfiguration Methods , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[14]  Reza Langari,et al.  Sensor fault diagnosis with a probabilistic decision process , 2013 .

[15]  George C. Verghese,et al.  Optimally robust redundancy relations for failure detection in uncertain systems , 1986, Autom..

[16]  Janos Gertler,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis in engineering systems , 1998 .

[17]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I: Quantitative model-based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[18]  Graeme West,et al.  Combining models of behavior with operational data to provide enhanced condition monitoring of AGR cores , 2014 .

[19]  Jaques Reifman,et al.  Survey of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Detection and Identification of Component Faults in Nuclear Power Plants , 1997 .

[20]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  A unified geometric approach to process and sensor fault identification and reconstruction : The unidimensional fault case , 1998 .

[21]  Kesheng Wang,et al.  Intelligent Condition Monitoring and Diagnosis Systems: A Computational Intelligence Approach , 2003 .

[22]  Hossam A. Gabbar,et al.  FSN-based fault modeling in CANDU® stations , 2014 .

[23]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Fuzzy sensor fusion for gas turbine power plants , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[24]  P. G. Rousseau,et al.  Design of a physical model of the PBMR with the aid of Flownet , 2003 .

[25]  Xie Chun-li,et al.  Research and design of distributed fault diagnosis system in nuclear power plant , 2013 .

[26]  R. J. Patton,et al.  Soft Computing Approaches to Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems: A Survey , 2000 .