Flow over an aerofoil without and with a leading-edge slat at a transitional Reynolds number

Abstract In this study, a multi-element aerofoil including NACA2415 aerofoil with NACA22 leading-edge slat is experimentally and computationally investigated at a transitional Reynolds number of 2×105. In the experiment, the single-element aerofoil experiences a laminar separation bubble, and a maximum lift coefficient of 1.3 at a stall angle of attack of 12° is obtained. This flow has been numerically simulated by FLUENT, employing the recently developed, k—k L—ω and k—ω shear—stress transport (SST) transition models. Both transition models are shown to accurately predict the location of the experimentally determined separation bubble. Experimental measurements also illustrate that the leading-edge slat significantly delays the stall up to an angle of attack of 20°, with a maximum lift coefficient of 1.9. The fluid dynamics governing this improvement is the elimination of the separation bubble by the injection of high momentum fluid through the slat over the main aerofoil — an efficient means of flow control. Numerical simulations using k—k L—ω are shown to accurately predict the lift curve, including stall, but not the complete elimination of the separation bubble. Conversely, the lift curve prediction using the k—ω SST transition model is less successful, but the separation bubble is shown to fully vanish in agreement with the experiment.

[1]  Hester Bijl,et al.  Bubble Bursting and Laminar Separation Unsteadiness on a Multi-Element High Lift Configuration , 2003 .

[2]  Fred E Weick,et al.  Wind-tunnel tests on combinations of a wing with fixed auxiliary airfoils having various chords and profiles , 1934 .

[3]  H. H. Bruun,et al.  An investigation of flow fields over multi-element aerofoils , 2002 .

[4]  B. Stratford The prediction of separation of the turbulent boundary layer , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Michele Napolitano,et al.  Predicting transition in two- and three-dimensional separated flows , 2008 .

[6]  A. I. Ormsbee,et al.  Optimization of airfoils for maximum lift , 1970 .

[7]  G. J. Bingham,et al.  Low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of an airfoil optimized for maximum lift coefficient , 1972 .

[8]  D. Wilcox Simulation of Transition with a Two-Equation Turbulence Model , 1994 .

[9]  M. Giles,et al.  Viscous-inviscid analysis of transonic and low Reynolds number airfoils , 1986 .

[10]  B. J. Abu-Ghannam,et al.  Natural Transition of Boundary Layers—The Effects of Turbulence, Pressure Gradient, and Flow History , 1980 .

[11]  P. Bradshaw,et al.  Modeling of Flow Transition Using an Intermittency Transport Equation , 2000 .

[12]  Keerati Suluksna,et al.  Assessment of intermittency transport equations for modeling transition in boundary layers subjected to freestream turbulence , 2008 .

[13]  T. Cebeci,et al.  Calculation of Separation Points in Incompressible Turbulent Flows , 1972, Journal of Aircraft.

[14]  R. Liebeck A Class of Airfoils Designed for High Lift in Incompressible Flow , 1973 .

[15]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Aerodynamic Flow Control of an Airfoil with Small Trailing-Edge Strips , 2006 .