Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice

Abstract The problems educators face in professional practice are complex, varied, and difficult to address. These issues range across teaching and learning topics, to social or community issues, classroom climate issues and countless others. Such problems are multifaceted, cross-disciplinary, human-centered, and rarely solved through simple or linear solutions. Grappling with them requires educators to think creatively about educational problems of practice. But given the challenges and expectations facing teachers, creativity is often seen as leisure in teaching practice. While creativity is considered a core 21st century thinking skill, many people are hesitant to self-identify as “creative,” or are uncomfortable with intellectual risk-taking and open-endedness. We suggest that design thinking may provide an accessible structure for teachers and teacher educators to think creatively in dealing with educational problems of practice. We examine a qualitative study of a graduate teaching course framed around using design thinking to creatively approach educational problems of practice. We discuss thematic takeaways that teachers experienced in learning about and using design thinking skills to approach educational problems of practice. Implications suggest that design thinking skills may provide habits of mind that benefit teachers in creative problem navigating.

[1]  Rohit Mehta,et al.  What We Educators Get Wrong About 21st-Century Learning: Results of a Survey , 2017 .

[2]  Thomas G. West In the Mind's Eye: Visual Thinkers, Gifted People With Learning Difficulties, Computer Images, and the Ironies of Creativity , 1991 .

[3]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[4]  A. Cropley The Myths of Heaven-Sent Creativity: Toward a Perhaps Less Democratic But More Down-to-Earth Understanding , 2016 .

[5]  Noelle A. Paufler,et al.  50 Myths and Lies That Threaten America's Public Schools: The Real Crisis in Education , 2014 .

[6]  A. Watson Design Thinking for Life , 2015 .

[7]  P. Norton,et al.  In Search of a Teacher Education Curriculum: Appropriating a Design Lens to Solve Problems of Practice. , 2015 .

[8]  S. Williams Self‐esteem and the self‐censorship of creative ideas , 2002 .

[9]  Thomas Kelley,et al.  Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential Within Us All , 2013 .

[10]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Scientific Genius: A Psychology of Science , 1988 .

[11]  Nathaniel Embse,et al.  Test Anxiety and High-Stakes Test Performance Between School Settings: Implications for Educators , 2012 .

[12]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[13]  P. Kirschner Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? , 2015 .

[14]  M. Lampert How Do Teachers Manage to Teach? Perspectives on Problems in Practice , 1985 .

[15]  N. Cross Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline Versus Design Science , 2001, Design Issues.

[16]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[17]  M. Runco Divergent Thinking, Creativity, and Giftedness , 1993 .

[18]  C. Dweck,et al.  Is Math a Gift? Beliefs That Put Females at Risk. , 2007 .

[19]  Punya Mishra,et al.  We Teach who We Are: Creativity in the Lives and Practices of Accomplished Teachers , 2015, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[20]  Dennis L. Weisman An Essay on the Art and Science of Teaching , 2012 .

[21]  R. Root-Bernstein,et al.  People, Passions, Problems: The Role of Creative Exemplars in Teaching for Creativity , 2017 .

[22]  A. Dworkin,et al.  The Effects of Standards Based School Accountability on Teacher Burnout and Trust Relationships: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2014 .

[23]  Emily C. Nusbaum,et al.  Are intelligence and creativity really so different? ☆: Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking , 2011 .

[24]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[25]  C. Moustakas Phenomenological Research Methods , 1994 .

[26]  Beth A. Ferri,et al.  The impact of standards-based reform: applying Brantlinger's critique of ‘hierarchical ideologies’ , 2013 .

[27]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Triangulation in Evaluation , 1985 .

[28]  Mary Kalantzis,et al.  The Teacher as Designer: Pedagogy in the New Media Age , 2010 .

[29]  A. Starko Creativity in the Classroom : Schools of Curious Delight is a book , 2014 .

[30]  L. Darling-Hammond The Challenge of Staffing Our Schools. , 2001 .

[31]  K. Robinson Out of Our Minds: Learning to Be Creative , 2001 .

[32]  C. Meinel,et al.  Design Thinking: An Educational Model towards Creative Confidence , 2010 .

[33]  R. Weisberg Creativity - Genius and Other Myths , 1986 .

[34]  J. Dewey Art as Experience , 1934 .

[35]  Bruce G. Buchanan,et al.  Creativity at the Metalevel: AAAI-2000 Presidential Address , 2001, AI Mag..

[36]  Sebastian K. Fixson,et al.  Adopting Design Thinking in Novice Multidisciplinary Teams: The Application and Limits of Design Methods and Reflexive Practices , 2013 .

[37]  Kay S. Bull,et al.  Empathy as related to creativity, dogmatism, and expressiveness. , 1995, The Journal of psychology.

[38]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[39]  J. Dewey Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[40]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2005 .

[41]  Nathaniel Embse,et al.  Test Anxiety Interventions for Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Treatment Studies from 2000–2010 , 2013 .

[42]  J. J. Irvine,et al.  The Role of Empathy in Teaching Culturally Diverse Students , 2002 .

[43]  Rod Michalko,et al.  Blindness Enters the Classroom , 2001 .

[44]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[45]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[46]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[47]  A. Campos,et al.  Dissociative Experiences and Creativity in Fine Arts Students , 2011 .

[48]  D. Henriksen WE TEACH WHO WE ARE: CREATIVITY AND TRANS-DISCIPLINARY THINKING IN THE PRACTICES OF ACCOMPLISHED TEACHERS , 2011 .

[49]  Danah Henriksen,et al.  Fail Again, Fail Better: Embracing Failure as a Paradigm for Creative Learning in the Arts , 2016 .

[50]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work , 2011 .

[51]  R. Bullough Against best practice: uncertainty, outliers and local studies in educational research , 2012 .

[52]  R. Sternberg,et al.  An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development , 1991 .

[53]  J. George,et al.  When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice , 2001 .

[54]  V. Anfara,et al.  Qualitative Analysis on Stage: Making the Research Process More Public , 2002 .

[55]  Ingrid Carlgren,et al.  Professionalism and Teachers as Designers. , 1999 .