Monte Carlo simulations of the electric field close to the body in realistic environments for application in personal radiofrequency dosimetry.

Personal dosemeters can play an important role in epidemiological studies and in radiofrequency safety programmes. In this study, a Monte Carlo approach is used in conjunction with the finite difference time domain method to obtain distributions of the electric field strength close to a human body model in simulated realistic environments. The field is a proxy for the response of an ideal body-worn electric field dosemeter. A set of eight environments were modelled based on the statistics of Rayleigh, Rice and log-normal fading to simulate outdoor and indoor multipath exposures at 450, 900 and 2100 MHz. Results indicate that a dosemeter mounted randomly within 10-50 mm of the adult or child body model (torso region) will on average underestimate the spatially averaged value of the incident electric field strength by a factor of 0.52 to 0.74 over the frequencies of 450, 900 and 2100 MHz. The uncertainty in results, assessed at the 95 % confidence level (between the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles) was largest at 2100 MHz and smallest at 450 MHz.

[1]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  Whole-body-averaged SAR from 50 MHz to 4 GHz in the University of Florida child voxel phantoms , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Luc Martens,et al.  STATISTICAL MULTIPATH EXPOSURE OF A HUMAN IN A REALISTIC ELECTROMAGNETIC ENVIRONMENT , 2008, Health physics.

[3]  Juan Blas,et al.  Potential exposure assessment errors associated with body‐worn RF dosimeters , 2007, Bioelectromagnetics.

[4]  A. Ahlbom.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[5]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  The association between exposure determined by radiofrequency personal exposimeters and human exposure: A simulation study , 2010, Bioelectromagnetics.

[6]  Outi Kivekäs,et al.  Angular power distribution and mean effective gain of mobile antenna in different propagation environments , 2002, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[7]  N. Metropolis,et al.  The Monte Carlo method. , 1949 .

[8]  Xiongwen Zhao,et al.  Propagation characteristics for wideband outdoor mobile communications at 5.3 GHz , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[9]  P. Dimbylow.  FDTD calculations of the whole-body averaged SAR in an anatomically realistic voxel model of the human body from 1 MHz to 1 GHz. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Rodney G. Vaughan,et al.  A statistical basis for lognormal shadowing effects in multipath fading channels , 1998, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  George L. Turin,et al.  A statistical model of urban multipath propagation , 1972 .

[12]  I. Cosic,et al.  Factors influencing uncertainty in measurement of electric fields close to the body in personal RF dosimetry. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[13]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  The relation between the specific absorption rate and electromagnetic field intensity for heterogeneous exposure conditions at mobile communications frequencies , 2009, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  R. Clarke.  A statistical theory of mobile-radio reception , 1968 .

[15]  S. Mazuelas,et al.  E-field assessment errors associated with RF dosemeters for different angles of arrival. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[16]  M. Cati,et al.  Using the log-normal distribution in the statistical treatment of experimental data affected by large dispersion , 2003, 2003 IEEE Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. Symposium Record (Cat. No.03CH37446).

[17]  Katja Radon,et al.  Personal dosimetry of exposure to mobile telephone base stations? An epidemiologic feasibility study comparing the Maschek dosimeter prototype and the Antennessa DSP‐090 system , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[18]  Luc Martens,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF PERSONAL RF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE AND ACTUAL ABSORPTION FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC , 2008, Health physics.