Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms

This study examines the relation between measurement system satisfaction, economic performance, and two general approaches to strategic performance measurement: greater measurement diversity and improved alignment with firm strategy and value drivers. We find consistent evidence that firms making more extensive use of a broad set of financial and (particularly) non-financial measures than firms with similar strategies or value drivers have higher measurement system satisfaction and stock market returns. However, we find little support for the alignment hypothesis that more or less extensive measurement than predicted by the firm's strategy or value drivers adversely affect performance. Instead, our results indicate that greater measurement emphasis and diversity than predicted by our benchmark model is associated with higher satisfaction and stock market performance. Our results also suggest that greater measurement diversity relative to firms with similar value drivers has a stronger relationship with stock market performance than greater measurement on an absolute scale. Finally, the balanced scorecard process, economic value measurement, and causal business modeling are associated with higher measurement system satisfaction, but exhibit almost no association with economic performance.

[1]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government , 2004 .

[2]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[3]  D. Larcker,et al.  Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective , 2001 .

[4]  Madhav V. Rajan,et al.  The Revenue Implications of Financial and Operational Measures of Product Quality , 2001 .

[5]  Robert H. Herz,et al.  The ValueReporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game , 2001 .

[6]  Darrell Rigby,et al.  Management Tools and Techniques: A Survey , 2001 .

[7]  M. Abernethy,et al.  The consequences of customization on management accounting system design , 2000 .

[8]  Zahirul Hoque,et al.  Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors: Impact on Organizational Performance , 2000 .

[9]  R. Banker,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of an Incentive Plan that Includes Nonfinancial Performance Measures , 2000 .

[10]  David Otley,et al.  Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research , 1999 .

[11]  W. A. Schiemann,et al.  Bullseye!: Hitting Your Strategic Targets Through High-Impact Measurement , 1999 .

[12]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems , 1999 .

[13]  C. Lewis,et al.  The Long-Run Performance of Firms Adopting Compensation Plans Based on Economic Profits , 1999 .

[14]  Thomas W. Scott,et al.  Performance measurement and managerial teams , 1999 .

[15]  Richard A. Riley,et al.  Using Nonfinancial Information to Predict Financial Performance: The Case of the U.S. Airline Industry , 1999 .

[16]  John Favaro,et al.  Managing IT for Value , 1999 .

[17]  D. Larcker,et al.  Innovations in Performance Measurement: Trends and Research Implications , 1998 .

[18]  Khim Ling Sim,et al.  The Performance Effects of Complementarities Between Manufacturing Practices and Management Accounting Systems , 1998 .

[19]  Kip R. Krumwiede.  The Implementation Steps of Activity-Based Costing and the Impact of Contextual and Organizational Factors , 1998 .

[20]  E. Ziegel,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard , 1998 .

[21]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach , 1998 .

[22]  Teresa Joyce Covin,et al.  How Nonfinancial Performance Measures Are Used , 1998 .

[23]  D. Larcker,et al.  Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction , 1998 .

[24]  James S. Wallace.  Adopting residual income-based compensation plans: Do you get what you pay for? , 1997 .

[25]  J. Davies,et al.  In Search of Shareholder Value: Managing the Drivers of Performance. , 1997 .

[26]  Vincent K. Chong,et al.  Strategic Choices, Environmental Uncertainty and SBU Performance: A Note on the Intervening Role of Management Accounting Systems , 1997 .

[27]  R. Dorf,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action , 1997, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[28]  Sujatha Perera,et al.  Customer-focused manufacturing strategy and the use of operations-based non-financial performance measures: A research note , 1997 .

[29]  M. Malone,et al.  Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower , 1997 .

[30]  Kim Langfield-Smith,et al.  Management control systems and strategy: A critical review☆ , 1997 .

[31]  James A. Brickley,et al.  Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture , 1996 .

[32]  Joel M. Stern,et al.  THE EVA® FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM , 1995 .

[33]  Anne M. Lillis,et al.  The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design , 1995 .

[34]  S. Mark Young,et al.  Readings in Management Accounting , 1995 .

[35]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Total Quality Management and the Choice of Information and Reward Systems , 1995 .

[36]  Cameron Guthrie,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE “FIT”BETWEEN STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM DESIGN , 1994 .

[37]  D. Simester,et al.  Customer Satisfaction Incentives , 1994 .

[38]  Gary W. Loveman,et al.  Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work , 1994 .

[39]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[40]  R. Eccles.  The performance measurement manifesto. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[41]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Information overload: A temporal approach☆ , 1990 .

[42]  Jeremy F. Dent.  Strategy, organization and control: Some possibilities for accounting research☆ , 1990 .

[43]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Sensitivity, Precision, and Linear Aggregation of Signals for Performance Evaluation , 1989 .

[44]  Bernard C. Reimann,et al.  Managing for value , 1989 .

[45]  V. Govindarajan.  A Contingency Approach to Strategy Implementation at the Business-Unit Level: Integrating Administrative Mechanisms with Strategy , 1988 .

[46]  Robert A. Simons.  Accounting control systems and business strategy: An empirical analysis , 1987 .

[47]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[48]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Linking control systems to business unit strategy: impact on performance , 1985 .

[49]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical investigation , 1984 .

[50]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard and Observability , 1979 .