Assessing Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) as an Alternative Material for Mid-Rise Residential Buildings in Cold Regions in China—A Life-Cycle Assessment Approach

Timber building has gained more and more attention worldwide due to it being a generic renewable material and having low environmental impact. It is widely accepted that the use of timber may be able to reduce the embodied energy of a building. However, the development of timber buildings in China is not as rapid as in some other countries. This may be because of the limitations of building regulations and technological development. Several new policies have been or are being implemented in China in order to encourage the use of timber in building construction and this could lead to a revolutionary change in the building industry in China. This paper is the first one to examine the feasibility of using Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) as an alternative solution to concrete by means of a cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment in China. A seven-storey reference concrete building in Xi’an was selected as a case study in comparison with a redesigned CLT building. Two cities in China, in cold and severe cold regions (Xi’an and Harbin), were selected for this research. The assessment includes three different stages of the life span of a building: materialisation, operation, and end-of-life. The inventory data used in the materialisation stage was mostly local, in order to ensure that the assessment appropriately reflects the situation in China. Energy consumption in the operation stage was obtained from simulation by commercialised software IESTM, and different scenarios for recycling of timber material in the end-of-life are discussed in this paper. The results from this paper show that using CLT to replace conventional carbon intensive material would reduce energy consumption by more than 30% and reduce CO2 emission by more than 40% in both cities. This paper supports, and has shown the potential of, CLT being used in cold regions with proper detailing to minimise environmental impact.

[1]  Simon Aicher,et al.  Hybrid cross-laminated timber plates with beech wood cross-layers , 2016 .

[2]  Andjelka Stanić,et al.  Economic-design optimization of cross laminated timber plates with ribs , 2016 .

[3]  Luke Bisby,et al.  Structural response of fire-exposed cross-laminated timber beams under sustained loads , 2016 .

[4]  Geoffrey Qiping Shen,et al.  Uncertainty analysis for measuring greenhouse gas emissions in the building construction phase: a case study in China , 2016 .

[5]  Annette M. Harte,et al.  Effects of the thickness of cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels made from Irish Sitka spruce on mechanical performance in bending and shear , 2016 .

[6]  Shiling Pei,et al.  Energy Consumption Analysis of Multistory Cross-Laminated Timber Residential Buildings: A Comparative Study , 2016 .

[7]  Alexander Hollberg,et al.  LCA in architectural design—a parametric approach , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  A McRobie,et al.  Dalston Lane - The world's tallest CLT building , 2016 .

[9]  Li Qingjian.  Lifecycle Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions of Aerated Concrete Block and Sintered Shale Hollow Brick , 2015 .

[10]  Omar A Espinoza,et al.  Outlook for Cross-Laminated Timber in the United States , 2014 .

[11]  Inge Blom,et al.  Environmental impact as a parameter in concrete structure parametric associative models , 2014 .

[12]  Kevin Lo,et al.  China's low-carbon city initiatives: The implementation gap and the limits of the target responsibility system , 2014 .

[13]  Jie Guo,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Rock Wool Board and EPS Board , 2014 .

[14]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[15]  L. Guardigli,et al.  Comparing the environmental impact of reinforced concrete and wooden structures , 2014 .

[16]  Xiao Yu,et al.  The role of China's renewable powers against climate change during the 12th Five-Year and until 2020 , 2013 .

[17]  F. Gao,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emission of Residential Building Designs in Beijing , 2012 .

[18]  Miaomiao Liu,et al.  The carbon emissions of Chinese cities , 2012 .

[19]  Frank Lam,et al.  A Comparative Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Mid-Rise Office Building Construction Alternatives: Laminated Timber or Reinforced Concrete , 2012 .

[20]  W. K. Hui,et al.  Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options , 2012 .

[21]  Zhang Li-sha.  Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental Impacts For the Whole Steel Production Process , 2012 .

[22]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Assessing China’s carbon intensity pledge for 2020: stringency and credibility issues and their implications , 2011 .

[23]  S Marinković,et al.  Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete. , 2010, Waste management.

[24]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[25]  Per-Erik ERIKSSON.  Comparative LCA:s for Wood and Other Construction Methods , 2006 .

[26]  Michael Spielmann,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Transport Services: Background Data for Freight Transport (10 pp) , 2005 .

[27]  H. J. Larsen,et al.  DS/ENV 1995-1-1 NAD National Application Document for Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 1994 .

[28]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .