Reframing Sacred Values

Sacred values differ from material or instrumental values in that they incorporate moral beliefs that drive action in ways dissociated from prospects for success. Across the world, people believe that devotion to essential or core values – such as the welfare of their family and country, or their commitment to religion, honor, and justice – are, or ought to be, absolute and inviolable. Counterintuitively, understanding an opponent's sacred values, we believe, offers surprising opportunities for breakthroughs to peace. Because of the emotional unwillingness of those in conflict situations to negotiate sacred values, conventional wisdom suggests that negotiators should either leave sacred values for last in political negotiations or try to bypass them with sufficient material incentives. Our empirical findings and historical analysis suggest that conventional wisdom is wrong. In fact, offering to provide material benefits in exchange for giving up a sacred value actually makes settlement more difficult because people see the offering as an insult rather than a compromise. But we also found that making symbolic concessions of no apparent material benefit might open the way to resolving seemingly irresolvable conflicts. We offer suggestions for how negotiators can reframe their position by demonstrating respect, and/or by apologizing for what they sincerely regret. We also offer suggestions for how to overcome sacred barriers by refining sacred values to exclude outmoded claims, exploiting the inevitable ambiguity of sacred values, shifting the context, provisionally prioritizing values, and reframing responsibility.

[1]  S. Atran.  Genesis of Suicide Terrorism , 2003, Science.

[2]  George Mariz.  The Culture of Honors , 2008 .

[3]  Kenneth M. Pollack.  The Persian Puzzle: The Conflict Between Iran and America , 2004 .

[4]  M. Harris.  The Cultural Ecology of India's Sacred Cattle , 1992, Current Anthropology.

[5]  L. Bernstein,et al.  Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II , 2001 .

[6]  Jon Campbell.  Black Hawk Down: A Story of Modern War , 2002 .

[7]  D. Medin,et al.  The semantic side of decision making , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  J. Vandello.  Culture of honor , 2009 .

[9]  O. Holsti,et al.  Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis , 1972 .

[10]  S. Atran,et al.  Sacred Barriers to Conflict Resolution , 2007, Science.

[11]  A. Varshney.  Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Rationality , 2003, Perspectives on Politics.

[12]  D. Medin,et al.  The cultural mind: environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. , 2005, Psychological review.

[13]  Caroline F. Ziemke,et al.  In the Same Light as Slavery: Building a Global Antiterrorist Consensus , 2006 .

[14]  SACRED VALUES, TERRORISM, AND THE LIMITS OF RATIONAL CHOICE , 2006 .

[15]  Sinead Byrne,et al.  Consociational and Civic Society Approaches to Peacebuilding in Northern Ireland , 2001 .

[16]  N. Bose,et al.  The Cultural Ecology of India's Sacred Cattle [and Comments and Replies] , 1966, Current Anthropology.

[17]  Frank E. A. Sander,et al.  Saying you're sorry , 1987 .

[18]  Andrea K. Grove,et al.  Not All Blarney Is Cast in Stone: International Cultural Conflict in Northern Ireland , 1999 .

[19]  P. M. Hendryx-Bedalov,et al.  Ethnography , 1998 .

[20]  Baron,et al.  Protected Values , 1997, Virology.

[21]  D. Medin,et al.  Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[23]  S. Atran.  In Gods We Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion , 2002 .

[24]  J. Dickinson.  Letters from a Farmer in Pennsylvania, to the Inhabitants of the British Colonies , 2008 .

[25]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[26]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[27]  M. Richardson.  Express delivery of H5N1 via migratory birds , 2006 .

[28]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[29]  Jack L. Rives,et al.  In Search of Identity: An Autobiography , 1992 .

[30]  P. Tetlock,et al.  The psychology of the unthinkable: taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  A. Marty.  Getting to YES. Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In , 1983 .

[32]  A. Engeland-Nourai.  The Persian Puzzle: The Conflict between Iran and America. New York, Random House, 2004, 576 p. , 2006 .

[33]  P. Tetlock.  Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  M. Bazerman,et al.  When 'Sacred' Issues Are at Stake , 2008 .

[35]  R. Goodin.  Making moral incentives pay , 1980 .

[36]  Richard E. Nisbett,et al.  Culture of honor , 1996 .

[37]  E. Durkheim.  FROM THE ELEMENTARY FORMS OF THE RELIGIOUS LIFE , 1996, The New Economic Sociology.

[38]  Martin Lalonde,et al.  Black Hills/White Justice: The Sioux Nation versus the United States, 1775 to the Present , 1992 .

[39]  S. Condor,et al.  The Minority‐Majority Conundrum in Northern Ireland: An Orange Order Perspective , 2007 .

[40]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  Robert J. Richards,et al.  :Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong , 2008 .

[42]  Ian S. Lustick.  Negotiating Truth: The Holocaust, Lehavdil, and Al-Nakba (1) , 2006 .

[43]  E. Peters.  Some Structural Aspects of the Feud among the Camel-Herding Bedouin of Cyrenaica , 1967, Africa.

[44]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[45]  Michael T. Klare,et al.  The worst is yet to come , 1982 .

[46]  J. Robbennolt.  What We Know And Don't Know About The Role of Apologies In Resolving Health Care Disputes , 2005 .

[47]  D. Moore,et al.  A Mixed-Motive Perspective on the Economics Versus Environment Debate , 1999 .

[48]  Scott Atran,et al.  Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.