Improving the local solution accuracy of large-scale digital image-based finite element analyses.

Digital image-based finite element modeling (DIBFEM) has become a widely utilized approach for efficiently meshing complex biological structures such as trabecular bone. While DIBFEM can provide accurate predictions of apparent mechanical properties, its application to simulate local phenomena such as tissue failure or adaptation has been limited by high local solution errors at digital model boundaries. Furthermore, refinement of digital meshes does not necessarily reduce local maximum errors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential to reduce local mean and maximum solution errors in digital meshes using a post-processing filtration method. The effectiveness of a three-dimensional, boundary-specific filtering algorithm was found to be mesh size dependent. Mean absolute and maximum errors were reduced for meshes with more than five elements through the diameter of a cantilever beam considered representative of a single trabecula. Furthermore, mesh refinement consistently decreased errors for filtered solutions but not necessarily for non-filtered solutions. Models with more than five elements through the beam diameter yielded absolute mean errors of less than 15% for both Von Mises stress and maximum principal strain. When applied to a high-resolution model of trabecular bone microstructure, boundary filtering produced a more continuous solution distribution and reduced the predicted maximum stress by 30%. Boundary-specific filtering provides a simple means of improving local solution accuracy while retaining the model generation and numerical storage efficiency of the DIBFEM technique.

[1]  R Huiskes,et al.  From structure to process, from organ to cell: recent developments of FE-analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics. , 1993, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  J H Keyak,et al.  Validation of an automated method of three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[3]  H. Saunders,et al.  Finite element procedures in engineering analysis , 1982 .

[4]  Scott J. Hollister,et al.  Digital-image-based finite element analysis for bone microstructure using conjugate gradient and Gaussian filter techniques , 1993, Optics & Photonics.

[5]  J H Keyak,et al.  Automated three-dimensional finite element modelling of bone: a new method. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[6]  B S Myers,et al.  An improved method for finite element mesh generation of geometrically complex structures with application to the skullbase. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Effect of mechanical set point of bone cells on mechanical control of trabecular bone architecture. , 1998, Bone.

[8]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[9]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  R E Guldberg,et al.  Mechanical Stimulation of Tissue Repair in the Hydraulic Bone Chamber , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  R. Huiskes,et al.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  R E Guldberg,et al.  The accuracy of digital image-based finite element models. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.