Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Mobile Phone Application for the Detection and Monitoring of Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, associated with significant morbidity, increased mortality, and rising health-care costs. Simple and available tools for the accurate detection of arrhythmia recurrence in patients after electrical cardioversion (CV) or ablation procedures for AF can help to guide therapeutic decisions. We conducted a prospective, single-center study to evaluate the accuracy of Cardiio Rhythm Mobile Application (CRMA) for AF detection. Patients >18 years of age who were scheduled for elective CV for AF were enrolled in the study. CRMA finger pulse recordings, utilizing an iPhone camera, were obtained before (pre-CV) and after (post-CV) the CV. The findings were validated against surface electrocardiograms. Ninety-eight patients (75.5% men), mean age of 67.7 ± 10.5 years, were enrolled. No electrocardiogram for validation was available in 1 case. Pre-CV CRMA readings were analyzed in 97 of the 98 patients. Post-CV CRMA readings were analyzed for 92 of 93 patients who underwent CV. One patient left before the recording was obtained. The Cardiio Rhythm Mobile Application correctly identified 94 of 101 AF recordings (93.1%) as AF and 80 of 88 non-AF recordings (90.1%) as non-AF. The sensitivity was 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.9% to 97.2%) and the specificity was 90.9% (95% CI = 82.9% to 96.0%). The positive predictive value was 92.2% (95% CI = 85.8% to 95.8%) and the negative predictive value was 92.0% (95% CI = 94.8% to 95.9%). In conclusion, the CRMA demonstrates promising potential in accurate detection and discrimination of AF from normal sinus rhythm in patients with a history of AF.

[1]  Daniel McDuff,et al.  Advancements in Noncontact, Multiparameter Physiological Measurements Using a Webcam , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  G. Stergiou,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of a home blood pressure monitor to detect atrial fibrillation , 2009, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[3]  J. Wiesel,et al.  Detection of atrial fibrillation using a modified microlife blood pressure monitor. , 2009, American journal of hypertension.

[4]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Non-contact, automated cardiac pulse measurements using video imaging and blind source separation , 2022 .

[5]  D. Singer,et al.  Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Jonathan H Seltzer,et al.  The Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Prospective Multi‐Center Randomized Study Comparing Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Versus Standard Loop Event Monitoring , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  Gerhard Hindricks,et al.  Performance of a New Leadless Implantable Cardiac Monitor in Detecting and Quantifying Atrial Fibrillation Results of the XPECT Trial , 2010, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[8]  Michael B. Gravenor,et al.  Assessment of Remote Heart Rhythm Sampling Using the AliveCor Heart Monitor to Screen for Atrial Fibrillation: The REHEARSE-AF Study , 2017, Circulation.

[9]  C. Murray,et al.  Worldwide Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation: A Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study , 2014, Circulation.

[10]  G. Lip,et al.  Accuracy of diagnosing atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram by primary care practitioners and interpretative diagnostic software: analysis of data from screening for atrial fibrillation in the elderly (SAFE) trial , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  A. Camm,et al.  The rhythm of the heart in active elderly subjects. , 1980, American heart journal.

[12]  D. Levy,et al.  Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. , 1994, JAMA.

[13]  M. Lloyd,et al.  Abstract 206: High False Positive Rates of Atrial Fibrillation Detection Among Stroke Patients who Receive Medtronic Implantable Loop Recorders , 2016, Stroke.

[14]  A. Capucci,et al.  Presence and Duration of Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Continuous Monitoring: Crucial Implications for the Risk of Thromboembolic Events , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[15]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Performance of an implantable automatic atrial fibrillation detection device: impact of software adjustments and relevance of manual episode analysis , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  Ming-Zher Poh,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of a Smartphone‐Based Photoplethysmographic Application for Atrial Fibrillation Screening in a Primary Care Setting , 2016, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[17]  Rahul Mehra,et al.  Comparison of continuous versus intermittent monitoring of atrial arrhythmias. , 2006, Heart rhythm.

[18]  A. Hofman,et al.  Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. , 2006, European heart journal.

[19]  T. Coleman,et al.  Accuracy of methods for detecting an irregular pulse and suspected atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[20]  Luigi Padeletti,et al.  Usefulness of continuous electrocardiographic monitoring for atrial fibrillation. , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.