Pulsed thermographic inspection of CFRP structures: experimental results and image analysis tools

In this study, three different CFRP specimens with internal artificial delaminations of various sizes and located at different depths were investigated by means of Pulsed Thermography (PT) under laboratory conditions. The three CFRP panels, having the same thickness and defects characteristics but with a different shape (planar, trapezoid and curved), were assessed after applying various signal processing tools on the acquired thermal data (i.e. Thermographic Signal Reconstruction, Pulsed Phase Thermography and Principal Component Thermography). The effectiveness of the above processing tools was initially evaluated in a qualitative manner, comparing the imaging outputs and the information retrieval in terms of defect detectability enhancement and noise reduction. Simultaneously, the produced defect detectability was evaluated through Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) computations, quantifying the image quality and the intensity contrast produced between the defected area and the adjacent background area of the test panel. From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the implementation of PT along with the application of advanced signal processing algorithms can be a useful technique for NDT assessment, providing enhanced qualitative information. Nevertheless, SNR analysis showed that despite the enhanced visibility resulting from these algorithms, these can be properly applied in order to retrieve the best possible information according to the user’s demands.

[1]  Christian Scheuerlein,et al.  Non-destructive testing of Cu solder connections using active thermography , 2012 .

[2]  L. Rosenhead Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1947, Nature.

[3]  Xavier Maldague,et al.  Theory and Practice of Infrared Technology for Nondestructive Testing , 2001 .

[4]  Richard E. Martin,et al.  Interpreting the results of pulsed thermography data , 2003 .

[5]  Bruce A. Rubadeux,et al.  Reconstruction and enhancement of active thermographic image sequences , 2003 .

[6]  Xavier Maldague,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative assessment of aerospace structures by pulsed thermography , 2007 .

[7]  Nik Rajic,et al.  Principal component thermography for flaw contrast enhancement and flaw depth characterisation in composite structures , 2002 .

[8]  Steven M. Shepard,et al.  Review and comparison of shearography and pulsed thermography for adhesive bond evaluation , 2007 .

[9]  S. Marinetti,et al.  Pulse phase infrared thermography , 1996 .

[10]  A. Bendada,et al.  Comparative Study of Active Thermography Techniques for the Nondestructive Evaluation of Honeycomb Structures , 2009 .

[11]  Xavier Maldague,et al.  Pulsed phase thermography reviewed , 2004 .

[12]  Adolfo Cobo,et al.  Signal to noise ratio (SNR) comparison for pulsed thermographic data processing methods applied to welding defect detection , 2010 .

[13]  Clemente Ibarra-Castanedo,et al.  A straightforward graphical user interface for basic and advanced signal processing of thermographic infrared sequences , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[14]  Steven M. Shepard,et al.  Advances in pulsed thermography , 2001, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Bruce W. Drinkwater,et al.  A comparison of acoustography, thermography and the ultrasonic wheel array for imaging impact damage in areospace composites , 2003 .