Cost competitive membrane—cryogenic post-combustion carbon capture

Abstract Recently it has been postulated that a post combustion capture process with three membrane stages and cryogenic separation can achieve high CO 2 recovery and purity while being economically competitive with existing commercial carbon capture technology ( Merkel et al., 2010 ). The advantage of this design is the use of burner feed air as a membrane sweep gas to ensure high CO 2 recovery. However, this results in dilution of oxygen in the burner and reduces the overall efficiency of the power station. In this study, two modifications to this process are considered. First, to ensure that the feed burner air supply is not oxygen deficient, we consider the addition of a small air separation membrane unit on this feed air supply. The O 2 enrichment design allows much greater CO 2 concentrations to be accommodated within this burner air supply. The resulting capture cost of the optimised process is reduced to less than US$ 32 per tonne avoided, with a burner air supply containing 33 mol% CO 2 . If flue gas desulphurisation and selective catalytic reduction are required then the cost of capture is less than US$ 43 per tonne avoided. However, one of the consequences of the oxygen enrichment is the need for four membrane stages which may limit its practical application. In comparison, a simplified process that removes the final CO 2 membrane concentration while still achieving high CO 2 recovery has increased energy demand and operating costs but results in lower overall capital cost. The cost of capture of this simplified process remains comparable at less than US$ 35 per tonne avoided for a sweep gas containing 9 mol% CO 2 .

[1]  Clem E. Powell,et al.  Polymeric CO2/N2 gas separation membranes for the capture of carbon dioxide from power plant flue gases , 2006 .

[2]  S. A. Stern,et al.  A new evaluation of membrane processes for the oxygen-enrichment of air. II. Effects of economic parameters and membrane properties , 1991 .

[3]  Hartmut Spliethoff,et al.  Power Generation from Solid Fuels , 2010 .

[4]  Haiqing Lin,et al.  Power plant post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: An opportunity for membranes , 2010 .

[5]  Geoff W. Stevens,et al.  CO2 capture from pre-combustion processes—Strategies for membrane gas separation , 2010 .

[6]  Ken Okazaki,et al.  NOx reduction mechanism in coal combustion with recycled CO2 , 1997 .

[7]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of capture for Australian lignite coal fired power plants , 2009 .

[8]  Geoff W. Stevens,et al.  Nitric oxide and carbon monoxide permeation through glassy polymeric membranes for carbon dioxide separation , 2011 .

[9]  Richard W. Baker,et al.  Natural Gas Processing with Membranes: An Overview , 2008 .

[10]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology , 2008 .

[11]  Colin A. Scholes,et al.  Effects of Minor Components in Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Polymeric Gas Separation Membranes , 2009 .

[12]  A. Smith,et al.  A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes , 2001 .

[13]  Robert Michael Thorogood,et al.  Developments in air separation , 1991 .

[14]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption , 2008 .

[15]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[16]  Chris Hendriks,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Removal from Coal-Fired Power Plants , 1994 .