Fatigue of sisal fibre reinforced composites: Constant-life diagrams and hysteresis loop capture

Composite materials have been manufactured using untreated or 0.06 M NaOH treated sisal fibre bundles in a polyester or epoxy matrix. Mechanical tests have been conducted to establish the static properties of the composites which have been used to calculate the maximum loads used during fatigue testing. Composites containing alkali treated fibre bundles have better mechanical properties than those with untreated fibre bundles. Alkali treatment has the greatest effect for polyester resin matrices. S-N diagrams constructed from fatigue data at stress ratios of R = 0.1 (tension-tension) and R = -1 (reversed loading) show improvement in the fatigue lives of composites following alkali treatment of sisal fibre bundles. Constant-life diagrams for epoxy matrix composites with untreated or alkali treated fibre bundles show the superiority of the alkali treated fibre composites for low cycle fatigue. Composites loaded in tension-tension fatigue (R = 0.1) exhibit hysteresis loops with diminishing loop area with increasing number of cycles. The composites loaded in reversed loading fatigue (R = -1) generate loops with increasing loop area with increasing number of cycles. Failure modes in tension-tension and reversed loading are very different with a distinctive buckling failure mode at R = -1. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  N. Otani,et al.  Fatigue life prediction of composites under two-stage loading , 1997 .

[2]  Martin P. Ansell,et al.  Fatigue damage and hysteresis in wood-epoxy laminates , 2001 .

[3]  I. Bond,et al.  Fatigue properties of jointed wood composites Part I Statistical analysis, fatigue master curves and constant life diagrams , 1998 .

[4]  E. Bisanda The Effect of Alkali Treatment on the Adhesion Characteristics of Sisal Fibres , 2000 .

[5]  J. Gassan A study of fibre and interface parameters affecting the fatigue behaviour of natural fibre composites , 2002 .

[6]  Kin Liao,et al.  Durability of bamboo-glass fiber reinforced polymer matrix hybrid composites , 2003 .

[7]  M. Pastor,et al.  Weibull analysis of microbond shear strength at sisal fibre–polyester resin interfaces , 2005 .

[8]  Ramesh Talreja,et al.  Fatigue damage mechanisms in unidirectional carbon-fibre-reinforced plastics , 1999 .

[9]  B. Singh,et al.  Influence of fiber surface treatment on the properties of sisal-polyester composites , 1996 .

[10]  M. Ansell,et al.  Fatigue evaluation and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis of sisal fibre-thermosetting resin composites , 2008 .

[11]  A. R. Bunsell,et al.  Acoustic emission during cyclic loading of carbon-fibre-reinforced plastics , 1975 .

[12]  A. Fernández‐Canteli,et al.  Comparative statistical analysis of the fatigue of composites under different modes of loading , 1997 .

[13]  W. Van Paepegem,et al.  Modelling damage and permanent strain in fibre-reinforced composites under in-plane fatigue loading , 2003 .

[14]  S. Tsai,et al.  Introduction to composite materials , 1980 .

[15]  T. Peijs,et al.  Fatigue mechanisms in unidirectional glass-fibre-reinforced polypropylene , 1999 .

[16]  T. Adam,et al.  Life–prediction for constant–stress fatigue in carbon–fibre composites , 1997, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  G. Holister,et al.  Fibre Reinforced Materials , 1966 .