Preference corrections: capturing student and instructor perceptions in educational recommendations

Recommender systems (RS) have been applied in the area of educations to recommend formal and informal learning materials, after-school programs or online courses. In the traditional RS, the receiver of the recommendations is the only stakeholder, but other stakeholders may be involved in the environment. Take educations for example, not only the preference of the student, but also the perspective of other stakeholders (e.g., instructors, parents, publishers, etc) may be important in the process of recommendations. Multi-stakeholder recommender systems (MSRS) were recently proposed to balance the needs of multiple stakeholders in the recommender systems. We use course project recommendations as a case study, and the perspectives of both students and instructors will be considered in our work. However, students and instructors may have different perceptions on the technical difficulty of the projects. In this paper, we particularly focus on the solution of preference corrections which can be used to capture different perceptions of students and instructors in the multi-stakeholder educational recommendations.

[1]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  New Recommendation Techniques for Multicriteria Rating Systems , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[2]  Yong Zheng,et al.  Multi-stakeholder Personalized Learning with Preference Corrections , 2019, 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).

[3]  Sudeshna Sarkar,et al.  Recommendation for Multi-stakeholders and through Neural Review Mining , 2019, CIKM.

[4]  Daniel Kifer,et al.  Context-aware citation recommendation , 2010, WWW '10.

[5]  Maria Soledad Pera,et al.  What to read next?: making personalized book recommendations for K-12 users , 2013, RecSys.

[6]  Michael D. Ekstrand,et al.  Retrieving and Recommending for the Classroom , 2018 .

[7]  Rong Jin,et al.  Learning to Rank by Optimizing NDCG Measure , 2009, NIPS.

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Reference point based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2006, GECCO.

[9]  C. Coello,et al.  Improving PSO-based Multi-Objective Optimization using Crowding , Mutation and �-Dominance , 2005 .

[10]  Enrique Alba,et al.  SMPSO: A new PSO-based metaheuristic for multi-objective optimization , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making(MCDM).

[11]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Reciprocal Recommendation Algorithm for the Field of Recruitment , 2011 .

[12]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Improving PSO-Based Multi-objective Optimization Using Crowding, Mutation and epsilon-Dominance , 2005, EMO.

[13]  Robin D. Burke,et al.  Educational Recommendation with Multiple Stakeholders , 2016, 2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence Workshops (WIW).

[14]  John Dines,et al.  A Multi-Objective Learning to re-Rank Approach to Optimize Online Marketplaces for Multiple Stakeholders , 2017, ArXiv.

[15]  Katrien Verbert,et al.  Panorama of Recommender Systems to Support Learning , 2015, Recommender Systems Handbook.

[16]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  Towards Multi-Stakeholder Utility Evaluation of Recommender Systems , 2016, UMAP.

[17]  Judy Kay,et al.  RECON: a reciprocal recommender for online dating , 2010, RecSys '10.

[18]  E. Hughes Multiple single objective Pareto sampling , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..

[19]  Yong Zheng,et al.  Personalized Educational Learning with Multi-Stakeholder Optimizations , 2019, UMAP.

[20]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[21]  Claes Wohlin,et al.  Experimentation in Software Engineering , 2000, The Kluwer International Series in Software Engineering.

[22]  Maria Soledad Pera,et al.  Retrieving and Recommending for the Classroom: Stakeholders, Objectives, Resources, and Users , 2018 .

[23]  Harshit Kumar,et al.  Fairness In Reciprocal Recommendations: A Speed-Dating Study , 2018, UMAP.

[24]  Yong Zheng,et al.  Personality-Aware Decision Making In Educational Learning , 2018, IUI Companion.

[25]  Patrick Seemann,et al.  Matrix Factorization Techniques for Recommender Systems , 2014 .

[26]  Yong Zheng,et al.  Utility-based multi-criteria recommender systems , 2019, SAC.

[27]  Robin D. Burke,et al.  Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments , 2002, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[28]  Maria Soledad Pera,et al.  Personalized recommendations on books for K-12 readers , 2012, BooksOnline '12.

[29]  Yong Zheng,et al.  Utility-Based Multi-Stakeholder Recommendations by Multi-Objective Optimization , 2018, 2018 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI).

[30]  Robin Burke,et al.  Experience Discovery: hybrid recommendation of student activities using social network data , 2011, HetRec '11.

[31]  Himan Abdollahpouri,et al.  Multiple Stakeholders in Music Recommender Systems , 2017, ArXiv.