Proton-induced degradation of charge transfer efficiency on FLEX CCD detectors: measurement and impact on instrument performances

The exposure of Charge-Coupled Devices (CCD) to high-energy particles in space leads to a degradation of their performances. One of the observed mechanisms is the creation of defects in the CCD silicon lattice by displacement damage, inducing a reduction of the Charge Transfer Efficiency (CTE), i.e. the ability of the device to efficiently transfer the photo-induced charge to the read-out output node. Hence a reduction of the imaging quality of the detector. We present here a comparison of the modelled and measured optical quality of the FLEX CCD exposed to a high energy proton flux. The optical quality was directly measured on an irradiated flight representative device. A physical model of the detector, including an accurate modelling of the charge trapping dynamic, is used to generate synthetic scenes affected by CTE degradation from which the optical quality is assessed and compared to the measurement. Eventually the correlation of the model and the measurement will allow to accurately assess the performances of a detector exposed to space radiation environment.

[1]  P. Verhoeve,et al.  Laboratory simulation of Euclid-like sky images to study the impact of CCD radiation damage on weak gravitational lensing , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[2]  G. Bazalgette Courrèges-Lacoste,et al.  Radiation-induced charge transfer inefficiency in charge-coupled devices: Sentinel-4 CCD pre-development as a case study , 2014, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[3]  Wout Verhoef,et al.  The FLuorescence EXplorer Mission Concept—ESA’s Earth Explorer 8 , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Lennart Lindegren,et al.  The impact of CCD radiation damage on Gaia astrometry – II. Effect of image location errors on the astrometric solution , 2012 .

[5]  David Hall,et al.  An improved model of charge transfer inefficiency and correction algorithm for the Hubble Space Telescope , 2014, 1401.1151.

[6]  J. Janesick,et al.  Scientific Charge-Coupled Devices , 2001 .

[7]  Dario Izzo,et al.  A parallel global multiobjective framework for optimization: pagmo , 2020, J. Open Source Softw..

[8]  Peter Coppo,et al.  Fluorescence Imaging Spectrometer (FLORIS) for ESA FLEX Mission , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[9]  C. Fabricius,et al.  Gaia Data Release 1 - On-orbit performance of the Gaia CCDs at L2 , 2016, 1609.04240.

[10]  Brian Shortt,et al.  A smartphone-based arbitrary scene projector for detector testing and instrument performance evaluation , 2020, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[11]  Peter Triebel,et al.  Instrument predevelopment activities for FLEX mission , 2019 .

[12]  B. Shortt,et al.  Comparative Study of Cryogenic Versus Room-Temperature Proton Irradiation of N-Channel CCDs and Subsequent Annealing , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  Berry Holl,et al.  The impact of CCD radiation damage on Gaia astrometry - I. Image location estimation in the presence of radiation damage , 2011, 1110.1547.

[14]  M. Cropper,et al.  How well can Charge Transfer Inefficiency be corrected? A parameter sensitivity study for iterative correction , 2015, 1506.07831.

[15]  J. Bruijne,et al.  An analytical model of radiation-induced Charge Transfer Inefficiency for CCD detectors , 2013, 1302.1416.

[16]  European Southern Observatory,et al.  Pyxel: the collaborative detection simulation framework , 2020, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.