Uncertainty Quantification for Geometry Deformations of Superconducting Cavities using Eigenvalue Tracking

The electromagnetic field distribution as well as the resonating frequency of various modes in superconducting cavities are sensitive to small geometry deformations. The occurring variations are motivated by measurements of an available set of resonators from which we propose to extract a small number of relevant and independent deformations by using a truncated Karhunen-Lo\`eve expansion. The random deformations are used in an expressive uncertainty quantification workflow to determine the sensitivity of the eigenmodes. For the propagation of uncertainty, a stochastic collocation method based on sparse grids is employed. It requires the repeated solution of Maxwell's eigenvalue problem at predefined collocation points, i.e., for cavities with perturbed geometry. To ensure consistency of the solution among the various eigenvalue problems and for numerical efficiency reasons, an eigenvalue tracking technique is proposed that is based on homotopies between collocation points and a Newton-based eigenvalue solver. The approach can be efficiently parallelized while tracking the eigenpairs. In this paper, we propose the application of isogeometric analysis since it allows for the exact description of the geometrical domains with respect to common computer-aided design kernels and for a straightforward and convenient way of handling geometrical variations.

[1]  H. Bungartz,et al.  Sparse grids , 2004, Acta Numerica.

[2]  E. al.,et al.  Superconducting TESLA cavities , 2000, physics/0003011.

[3]  K. Halbach,et al.  Superfish-a Computer Program for Evaluation of RF Cavities with Cylindrical Symmetry , 1976 .

[4]  Ursula van Rienen,et al.  Comparison of techniques for uncertainty quantification of superconducting radio frequency cavities , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA).

[5]  Vladimir Gubarev,et al.  A Database for the European XFEL , 2013 .

[6]  G. Sangalli,et al.  Isogeometric analysis in electromagnetics: B-splines approximation , 2010 .

[7]  R. Fox,et al.  Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[8]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Isogeometric simulation of Lorentz detuning in superconducting accelerator cavities , 2014, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[9]  Carl de Boor,et al.  A Practical Guide to Splines , 1978, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[10]  Ronald H. W. Hoppe,et al.  Finite element methods for Maxwell's equations , 2005, Math. Comput..

[11]  Daniele Boffi,et al.  Finite element approximation of eigenvalue problems , 2010, Acta Numerica.

[12]  Thomas Weiland,et al.  Triangular discretization method for the evaluation of RF-fields in cylindrically symmetric cavities , 1985 .

[13]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  GeoPDEs: A research tool for Isogeometric Analysis of PDEs , 2011, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[14]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  A Stochastic Collocation Method for Elliptic Partial Differential Equations with Random Input Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[15]  H. Keller,et al.  Homotopy Method for the Large, Sparse, Real Nonsymmetric Eigenvalue Problem , 1997, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl..

[16]  Sebastian Schöps,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis simulation of TESLA cavities under uncertainty , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications (ICEAA).

[17]  Thomas Weiland,et al.  On the Unique Numerical Solution of Maxwellian Eigenvalue Problems in Three-dimensions , 1984 .

[18]  Johann Heller,et al.  Quantification of Geometric Uncertainties in Single Cell Cavities for BESSY VSR using Polynomial Chaos , 2014 .

[19]  T. Weiland,et al.  Computer Modelling of Two- and Three-Dimensional Cavities , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  V. Akcelik,et al.  Modeling imperfection effects on dipole modes in TESLA cavity , 2007, 2007 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference (PAC).

[21]  D. Xiu Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach , 2010 .

[22]  U. van Rienen,et al.  Automated Mode Recognition Algorithm for Accelerating Cavities , 2014 .

[23]  Zeger Bontinck,et al.  Recent Advances of Isogeometric Analysis in Computational Electromagnetics , 2017, ArXiv.

[24]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[25]  Jens Gravesen,et al.  On the sensitivities of multiple eigenvalues , 2011 .

[26]  Herbert De Gersem,et al.  Stochastic Response Surface Method for Studying Microphoning and Lorenz Detuning of Accelerator Cavities , 2012 .

[27]  K. Ritter,et al.  Simple Cubature Formulas with High Polynomial Exactness , 1999 .

[28]  Fabio Nobile,et al.  A Sparse Grid Stochastic Collocation Method for Partial Differential Equations with Random Input Data , 2008, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..