The online structure and development of posting behaviour in Dutch anti-vaccination groups on Telegram

Online communities play an important role in spreading public discontent and could contribute to polarization. This study focuses on anti-vaccination views in the Netherlands, which have intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the structure and development of five Dutch anti-vaccination Telegram groups and studied their interactivity and posting behaviour. Using group-based trajectory modelling, we examined the development of users’ posting behaviour in these groups. We find four posting trajectories across all five groups. A small group of users contributes the majority of posts. Overall, posting frequency declines over time and our results do not show evidence for a group of users whose posting frequency increases. This is taken to indicate that only a small group of users spread their anti-vaccination views through Telegram groups. While social media can reach a broad audience, most users are not necessarily engaged to also actively contribute to the online anti-vaccination community.

[1]  Irene V. Pasquetto,et al.  Vaccine hesitancy in online spaces: A scoping review of the research literature, 2000-2020 , 2021, Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.

[2]  Aleksandra Urman,et al.  Analyzing protest mobilization on Telegram: The case of 2019 Anti-Extradition Bill movement in Hong Kong , 2021, PloS one.

[3]  A. Baines,et al.  #Scamdemic, #Plandemic, or #Scaredemic: What Parler Social Media Platform Tells Us about COVID-19 Vaccine , 2021, Vaccines.

[4]  A. Blokland,et al.  Profiling Darkweb Child Sexual Exploitation Material Forum Members Using Longitudinal Posting History Data , 2021, Social Science Computer Review.

[5]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Online Engagement Between Opposing Political Protest Groups via Social Media is Linked to Physical Violence of Offline Encounters , 2021, Social Media + Society.

[6]  Erika Bonnevie,et al.  Quantifying the rise of vaccine opposition on Twitter during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, Journal of Communication in Healthcare.

[7]  N. Biller-Andorno,et al.  The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis , 2020, medRxiv.

[8]  Laura Pradas-Hernández,et al.  Analysis of the Anti-Vaccine Movement in Social Networks: A Systematic Review , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  Raffael Heiss.  The Affective Foundation of Political Opinion Expression on Social Media: A Panel Analysis , 2020 .

[10]  Richard A. Rogers.  Deplatforming: Following extreme Internet celebrities to Telegram and alternative social media , 2020, European Journal of Communication.

[11]  P. Ball.  Anti-vaccine movement could undermine efforts to end coronavirus pandemic, researchers warn , 2020, Nature.

[12]  Tyler Rhodes,et al.  The Effects of Group Size and Time on the Formation of Online Communities: Evidence From Reddit , 2018, Social Media + Society.

[13]  U. Simonsohn.  Two Lines: A Valid Alternative to the Invalid Testing of U-Shaped Relationships With Quadratic Regressions , 2018, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[14]  Sven L Klijn,et al.  Introducing the fit-criteria assessment plot – A visualisation tool to assist class enumeration in group-based trajectory modelling , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[15]  Hywel T. P. Williams,et al.  Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change , 2015 .

[16]  Lenny Grant,et al.  Vaccination Persuasion Online: A Qualitative Study of Two Provaccine and Two Vaccine-Skeptical Websites , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Understanding lurkers in online communities: A literature review , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Alcides Velasquez,et al.  Latent Users in an Online User-Generated Content Community , 2014, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[19]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  Enhancing Online Community Activity: Development and validation of the CA framework , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[20]  Xuequn Wang,et al.  Beyond Adoption Intention: Online Communities and Member Motivation to Contribute Longitudinally , 2012, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[21]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Feed me: motivating newcomer contribution in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[22]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Predicting Continued Participation in Newsgroups , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  K. Roeder,et al.  A SAS Procedure Based on Mixture Models for Estimating Developmental Trajectories , 2001 .

[25]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[26]  Jonathan M. Berman.  Anti-vaxxers , 2020 .

[27]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Non-public and public online community participation: Needs, attitudes and behavior , 2006, Electron. Commer. Res..

[28]  Wen-Bin Yu,et al.  Enhancing business networks using social network based virtual communities , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[29]  D. Nagin.  Group-based modeling of development , 2005 .