The First Technical Writer in English: A Challenge to the Hegemony of Chaucer

The claim that Geoffrey Chaucer was “the first technical writer in English,” which appears several times in the recent literature on the history of technical writing in early English, misleads because numerous Middle English technical prose texts either precede Chaucer's Treatise on the Astrolabe or are contemporaneous with it. In fact, an important tradition of technical writing exists in both Old and Middle English and extends through the English Renaissance. Historians of technical writing will find it more profitable to investigate the tradition of English practical prose than to find further firsts for their field.

[1]  Medical Works of the Fourteenth Century; together with a List of Plants recorded in Contemporary Writings, with their Identification , 2022, Nature.

[2]  A. W. Richeson,et al.  English Land Measuring to 1800: Instruments and Practices , 1966 .

[3]  John Algeo,et al.  Problems in the origins and development of the English language , 1964 .

[4]  M. Mcvaugh.  Doctors and Medicine in Medieval England, 1340-1530. Robert S. Gottfried , 1989 .

[5]  Carol S. Lipson.  Descriptions and Instructions in Medieval Times: Lessons to be Learnt from Geoffrey Chaucer's Scientific Instruction Manual , 1982 .

[6]  J. North.  Chaucer's universe , 1988 .

[7]  M. Carlin.  Doctors and medicine in medieval England, 1340–1530 , 1987, Medical History.

[8]  E. V. Hitchcock,et al.  On the continuity of English prose from Alfred to More and his school , 1934 .

[9]  Joseph Wright,et al.  Old English Grammar , 1955 .

[10]  J. Hagge.  Ties that Bind: Ancient Epistolography and Modern Business Communication. , 1989 .

[11]  Ian Alistair Gordon,et al.  The Movement of English Prose , 1966 .

[12]  John Hagge,et al.  The Spurious Paternity of Business Communication Principles , 1989 .

[13]  Arthur B. Friedman.  The Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature , 1941 .

[14]  E. Williams.  ÆLfric's Grammatical Terminology , 1958, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

[15]  S. Greenfield.  A new critical history of Old English literature , 1965 .

[16]  A. Partridge.  A companion to Old and Middle English studies , 1982 .

[17]  R. John Brockmann.  Bibliography of Articles on the History of Technical Writing , 1983 .

[18]  M. Cameron.  Bald's Leechbook: its sources and their use in its compilation , 1983, Anglo-Saxon England.

[19]  M. Cameron.  The sources of medical knowledge in Anglo-Saxon England , 1982 .

[20]  Edward Peters,et al.  The World of "Piers Plowman" , 1976 .

[21]  L. E. Voigts.  Anglo-Saxon Plant Remedies and the Anglo-Saxons , 1979, Isis.

[22]  Michael G. Moran,et al.  Research in Technical Communication: A Bibliographic Sourcebook , 1985 .

[23]  R. Gunther.  Chaucer and Messahalla on the astrolabe , 1929 .

[24]  J. Hagge,et al.  Linguistic Politeness in Professional Prose , 1989 .

[25]  R. Robbins.  Medical Manuscripts in Middle English , 1970, Speculum.

[26]  A. Edwards,et al.  Middle English prose : a critical guide to major authors and genres , 1988 .

[27]  John Hagge,et al.  The Process Religion and Business Communication , 1987 .

[28]  D. Waters.  The art of navigation in England in Elizabethan and early Stuart times , 1959 .

[29]  L. E. Voigts,et al.  A Latin Technical Phlebotomy and Its Middle English Translation , 1984 .

[30]  Does Clio Have a Place in Technical Writing? Considering Patents in a History of Technical Communication , 1988 .