Histologic Evaluation of Human Pulp Response to Total Etch and Self Etch Adhesive Systems

Background To investigate pulp response to the application of two types adhesive systems (total-etch and self-etch) in human premolar teeth. Materials and Methods Cavities limited to enamel walls in all margins with 2.5 mm depth were prepared on buccal surfaces of thirty three human premolars. The cavities were treated with the following adhesive. Single Bond (SB) and Prompt L-Pop (PLP). The teeth were extracted after 30 days and prepared due to histological technique. Results Pulp responses were evaluated in three field including inflammatory cell response, pulp tissue disorganization and restorative dentin formation. There were no differences in histological response of the pulp tissue (P > 0.05). Conclusion Both adhesive systems showed good biological compatibility.

[1]  P. Nelson-Filho,et al.  Direct pulp capping with a self-etching adhesive system: histopathologic evaluation in dogs' teeth. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[2]  M. Fan,et al.  The adverse effect of self-etching adhesive systems on dental pulp after direct pulp capping. , 2009, Quintessence international.

[3]  S. Papadimitriou,et al.  Pulpal responses after application of current adhesive systems to deep cavities , 2007, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[4]  K. Shinkai,et al.  Histopathologic study on pulp response to single-bottle and self-etching adhesive systems. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[5]  D. Pashley,et al.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  L. Rosivall,et al.  In vivo examination of the Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Dental Adhesive System in rat (vitalmicroscopic study). , 2000, Operative dentistry.

[7]  J. Hebling,et al.  Human pulp response after an adhesive system application in deep cavities. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  M. Otsuki,et al.  Biocompatibility of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 and Clearfil AP-X system on nonexposed and exposed primate teeth. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[9]  Dixon Dl,et al.  Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: damp versus dry primer application. , 1994 .

[10]  K. C. White,et al.  Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: damp versus dry primer application. , 1994, Quintessence international.

[11]  R. Walton,et al.  Endodontics: Principles and Practice , 1989 .

[12]  M. Benz,et al.  [Toxicity tests of dentin and enamel adhesives used as cavity liners in cell culture]. , 1985, Deutsche zahnarztliche Zeitschrift.

[13]  Norimasa Kurosaki,et al.  Non-Pressure Adhesion of a New Adhesive Restorative Resin , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[14]  H. Nyborg,et al.  Acid Treatment of Cavities Under Resin Fillings: Bacterial Growth in Dentinal Tubules and Pulpal Reactions , 1973, Journal of dental research.