No templates for rejection: a failure to configure attention to ignore task-irrelevant features

ABSTRACT Knowing the colour of an upcoming target allows one to bias attention towards objects of that colour. It is far less clear whether knowing the colour of an up-coming distractor can allow one to suppress attention to items of that colour. Arita, Carlisle, and Woodman (2012) suggest that people can create a template for rejection. However, the method used in Arita et al. may have allowed people to adopt a strategy of internally generating a positive cue for the target colour or target hemifield. Here we use a method very similar to theirs, but manipulate the display layouts and the number of un-cued colours in ways that should thwart such strategies. Across three experiments, we find a negative cuing benefit only in a very special circumstance that encourages a strategic shift to internally generating a positive cue (the same circumstance used by Arita et al.). We conclude that people are unable to use a negative feature-cue on a trial-by-trial basis to suppress attention to upcoming distractors, and attribute the finding in Arita et al. to a strategic shift rather than a template for rejection.

[1]  L G Williams,et al.  The effects of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[2]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Joshua B. Ewen,et al.  Inhibition Drives Early Feature-Based Attention , 2014, Psychological science.

[4]  C. Frith,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Visual Selective Attention , 2001, Science.

[5]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention. , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[6]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[7]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  Awareness of the continuously visible: Information acquisition during preview , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Howard E Egeth,et al.  The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Pratt,et al.  Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  T. Moore,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention. , 2017, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  W. Thalheimer,et al.  How to calculate effect sizes from published research: A simplified methodology , 2002 .

[19]  V. Lamme.  Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Postattentive vision. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention? , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Jason T. Arita,et al.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[24]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Evidence for negative feature guidance in visual search is explained by spatial recoding. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  S. Luck,et al.  Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Nancy B. Carlisle,et al.  Automatic and strategic effects in the guidance of attention by working memory representations. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[28]  S. Tipper.  Does Negative Priming Reflect Inhibitory Mechanisms? A Review and Integration of Conflicting Views , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[29]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.