The Prevalence of Elder Care Responsibilities among the Work Force Population

This review synthesizes the findings of 17 independent studies dealing with the prevalence of elder care responsibilities among the work force population. Across-study, summative findings were: (a) approximately one fifth (M = 21.1%) to one quarter (Md = 23.1%) of employees provide care for an elderly dependent; primary study findings varied by a factor of nearly 25, ranging from a high estimate of 46.0% to a low of 1.9%; (b) the average response rate was fairly low (M = 45.0% and Md = 41. 1%), indicating that the studies captured only slightly more than one third, but less than half of all eligible in-sample assignments; (c) the correlation of prevalence and response rates was found to be r = -.69, p < .01; (d) the partial correlation of prevalence with response rate, adjusted for the breadth of the elder care operational definition, remained significant, r = -.50,p < .05; and (e) these two methodological characteristics together accounted for half (R2 = .505) of the variability in reported prevalence, response rate accounting for nearly all (95.4%) of this explained criterion variation. Bias due to nonresponse thus represents a potent threat to the validity of the mean prevalence estimate found in this body of research (21.1%). The implementation of statistical controls for nonresponse and definitional inconsistencies resulted in an estimated prevalence of 7.4% to 11.8%; however, this review outcome is tentative at best and must be tested with future, better controlled primary studies.

[1]  A. Scharlach Role strain in mother-daughter relationships in later life. , 1987, The Gerontologist.

[2]  R. Rice,et al.  An Elder Care Training Needs Assessment Among Employee Assistance Program Staff , 1990 .

[3]  J. Muurinen The Economics of Informal Care: Labor Market Effects in the National Hospice Study , 1986, Medical care.

[4]  K. A. Brownlee,et al.  A Note on the Effects of Nonresponse on Surveys , 1957 .

[5]  R. Stone,et al.  Defining family caregivers of the elderly: implications for research and public policy. , 1991, The Gerontologist.

[6]  M. Gilhooly Senile dementia: factors associated with caregivers' preference for institutional care. , 1986, The British journal of medical psychology.

[7]  M. Lawton,et al.  Measuring caregiving appraisal. , 1989, Journal of gerontology.

[8]  A. Scharlach,et al.  Employment and caregiver strain: an integrative model. , 1991, The Gerontologist.

[9]  A. Scharlach,et al.  Caregiving and employment: results of an employee survey. , 1989, The Gerontologist.

[10]  M. N. Donald,et al.  IMPLICATIONS OF NONRESPONSE FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE DATA , 1960 .

[11]  M. Cantor Strain among caregivers: a study of experience in the United States. , 1983, The Gerontologist.

[12]  P. Kemper,et al.  Spouses and children of disabled elders: how large a constituency for long-term care reform? , 1989, The Milbank quarterly.

[13]  J. Sangl,et al.  Caregivers of the frail elderly: a national profile. , 1987, The Gerontologist.

[14]  P. F. Short,et al.  The Competing Demands of Employment and Informal Caregiving to Disabled Elders , 1990, Medical care.

[15]  G. Spitze,et al.  More Evidence on Women (and Men) in the Middle , 1990, Research on aging.

[16]  C. L. Johnson,et al.  A critique of the caregiving literature. , 1990, The Gerontologist.