BEHAVIOR AND FAILURE ANALYSIS OF A MULTIPLE-FRAME HIGHWAY BRIDGE IN THE 1994 NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE

This study examines the partial collapse and failure of the Route 14/Interstate 5 Separation and Overhead bridge, a curved ten-span concrete structure, during the 1994 earthquake in Northridge California. It examines the cause of the failure by comparing estimates of the capacities and demands of components in the bridge. Nonlinear static analysis, also known as pushover analysis, is used to determine the capacity of a frame In order to evaluate the earthquake response, nonlinear dynamic analysis results are used. The demand capacity comparison indicates that the most likely cause of the collapse was due to the shear failure of two piers in a brittle- ductile mode. A three-dimensional model of the bridge is used to investigate the behavior of the bridge had it been seismically retrofit before the earthquake. The displacements from the nonlinear model are compared with linear models. It is shown that the linear compression provides a good estimate of the displacement demands.

[1]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Seismic Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns , 1994 .

[2]  S. P. Jarpe,et al.  Ground-motion variability at the Highway 14 and I-5 interchange in the northern San Fernando Valley , 1996 .

[3]  Charles C. Thiel,et al.  Earthquake Spectra , 1984 .

[4]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Engineering features of the San Fernando earthquake of February 9, 1971 , 1971 .

[5]  Antoine E. Naaman,et al.  PRESTRESSED CONCRETE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN , 1982 .

[6]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  New design and analyis procedures for intermediate hinges in multiple-frame bridges , 1997 .

[7]  N. A. Abrahamson,et al.  Effects of the hanging wall and footwall on ground motions recorded during the Northridge earthquake , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  Ian G. Buckle,et al.  Implications of Spatial Variation of Ground Motion on the Collapse of Sr14/I5 Southbound Separation and Overhead Bridge in the Northridge Earthquake , 1999 .

[9]  A. Ugural,et al.  Advanced strength and applied elasticity , 1981 .

[10]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  SEISMIC SHEAR STRENGTH OF REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS. DISCUSSIONS AND CLOSURE , 1996 .

[11]  Y. Reichman,et al.  Extending the seismic life span of bridges: Analytical evaluation of retrofit measures , 1995 .

[12]  Ian G. Buckle.  The Northridge, California earthquake of January 17, 1994 : Perfomance of highway bridges , 1994 .

[13]  Jack P. Moehle,et al.  Preliminary report on the seismological and engineering aspects of the January 17, 1994 Northridge Earthquake , 1994 .

[14]  A. Helba,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Structures , 1944, Nature.

[15]  A. Elnashai,et al.  ANALYTICAL AND FIELD EVIDENCE OF THE DAMAGING EFFECT OF VERTICAL EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION , 1996 .

[16]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  A dislocation model of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake determined from strong ground motions , 1994 .

[17]  L. G. Jaeger,et al.  Dynamics of structures , 1990 .