Developing Unified Theories in Ecology as Exemplified with Diversity Gradients

A scientific field matures as its theoretical underpinnings consolidate around unified theories: conceptual structures consisting of a few general propositions that encompass a wide domain of phenomena and from which can be derived an array of models. We demonstrate this process with a synthetic theory of ecological gradients and species richness. Our unified theory rests on four propositions. First, variation in some environmental factor effects variation in the number of individuals creating a gradient. Second, in a uniform environment of fixed area, more individuals lead to more species. Third, the variance of an environmental factor increases with its mean for sites of equal area. Fourth, all nonmonotonic relationships (i.e., hump shaped or U shaped) require a trade‐off in organismal performance or in population characteristics with respect to the environmental gradient. We identify 17 models that link environmental gradients with diversity, show their relationship to our framework, and describe issues surrounding their empirical testing. We illustrate how a general theory can be used to build new models such as that for the U‐shaped productivity‐diversity relationship. Finally, we discuss how our theory could be unified further with other theories of diversity and indicate other areas of ecology that are ripe for unification. By providing an example of the process of theory unification, we hope to encourage such efforts throughout ecology.

[1]  David H. Wright,et al.  Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory , 1983 .

[2]  J. Platt Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.

[3]  B. D. Coleman On random placement and species-area relations , 1981 .

[4]  M. Leibold Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities , 1999 .

[5]  J. Diamond,et al.  Ecology and Evolution of Communities , 1976, Nature.

[6]  W. Carson,et al.  The significance of assemblage‐level thinning for species richness , 1999 .

[7]  R. Sterner A ONE‐RESOURCE “STOICHIOMETRY”? , 2004 .

[8]  S. K. Lyons,et al.  Latitudinal patterns of range size : methodological concerns and empirical evaluations for New World bats and marsupials , 1997 .

[9]  M. Rosenzweig Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[10]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  Species richness, species-area curves and Simpson's paradox , 2000 .

[11]  Burt,et al.  Natural selection in the wild. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Bai-lian Li,et al.  ENERGY PARTITIONING BETWEEN DIFFERENT-SIZED ORGANISMS AND ECOSYSTEM STABILITY , 2004 .

[13]  David Tilman,et al.  The maintenance of species richness in plant communities , 1993 .

[14]  THE VALUE OF NULL THEORIES IN ECOLOGY , 2004 .

[15]  V. Volterra Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species considered Mathematically , 1926, Nature.

[16]  James H. Brown,et al.  A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology , 1997, Science.

[17]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[18]  C. Darwin The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 1859 .

[19]  James H. Brown,et al.  Toward a metabolic theory of ecology , 2004 .

[20]  D. Simberloff,et al.  TESTS OF COMMUNITY‐WIDE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AGAINST NULL HYPOTHESES , 1979, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[22]  D. Wollkind Exploitation in Three Trophic Levels: An Extension Allowing Intraspecies Carnivore Interaction , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[23]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  How are diversity and productivity related , 1993 .

[24]  Colwell,et al.  The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  A. V. Humboldt Ansichten der Natur, mit wissenschaftlichen Erläuterungen , 1849 .

[26]  S. Scheiner,et al.  Diversity, productivity and scale in Wisconsin vegetation , 2002 .

[27]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[28]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous Vegetation , 1973, Nature.

[29]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Plant Succession: Life History and Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[30]  V. Volterra Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species considered Mathematically , 1926 .

[31]  J. Lawton,et al.  Why More Productive Sites Have More Species: An Experimental Test of Theory Using Tree‐Hole Communities , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[32]  R. Levins Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[33]  M. Huston A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[34]  K. L. Cottingham,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP IN LAKE COMMUNITIES BETWEEN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AND SPECIES RICHNESS , 2000 .

[35]  James B. Grace,et al.  The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment , 1999 .

[36]  J. Platt Strong Inference , 2007 .

[37]  J. C. Roberts Nested subset analysis: Randomizations with regard to placement of species versus individuals , 2002 .

[38]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  A Graphical Model of Keystone Predators in Food Webs: Trophic Regulation of Abundance, Incidence, and Diversity Patterns in Communities , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[39]  J. Connell,et al.  The Ecological Regulation of Species Diversity , 1964, The American Naturalist.

[40]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Competition and Coexistence: The Effects of Resource Transport and Supply Rates , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[41]  M. Hassell,et al.  Resource Competition and Community Structure , 1984 .

[42]  F. W. Preston The Canonical Distribution of Commonness and Rarity: Part I , 1962 .

[43]  M. Willig,et al.  Community structure, abundance, and morphology , 2000 .

[44]  A. J. Lotka Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[45]  M. Cadotte Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[46]  M. Rosenzweig Species Diversity Gradients: We Know More and Less Than We Thought , 1992 .

[47]  Richard Field,et al.  Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water-energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography , 2000 .

[48]  J. Bernardo,et al.  Simplifying the Jargon of Community Ecology: A Conceptual Approach , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[49]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  Community Ecology: Is It Time to Move On? , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[50]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[51]  S. K. Lyons,et al.  An analytical model of latitudinal gradients of species richness with an empirical test for marsupials and bats in the New World , 1998 .

[52]  Richard Field,et al.  Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness , 2004 .

[53]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[54]  M. B. Kirkham,et al.  On the origin of the theory of mineral nutrition of plants and the law of the minimum , 1999 .

[55]  E. Pianka Latitudinal Gradients in Species Diversity: A Review of Concepts , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[56]  A. Gray,et al.  I. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION , 1963 .

[57]  B. Hawkins Ecology's oldest pattern? , 2001, Endeavour.

[58]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[59]  J. Lawton Are there general laws in ecology , 1999 .

[60]  M. Austin Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities , 1989 .

[61]  M. Willig,et al.  Density compensation in New World bat communities , 2000 .

[62]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  LATITUDINAL GRADIENTS OF BIODIVERSITY:Pattern,Process,Scale,and Synthesis , 2003 .

[63]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition? , 1979 .

[64]  J. Fargione,et al.  DOES METABOLIC THEORY APPLY TO COMMUNITY ECOLOGY? IT'S A MATTER OF SCALE , 2004 .

[65]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Community consequences of life-history traits in a variable environment , 1988 .

[66]  K. Rohde Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause , 1992 .

[67]  J. Oksanen Is the humped relationship between species richness and biomass an artefact due to plot size , 1996 .

[68]  Daniel Simberloff,et al.  SANTA ROSALIA RECONSIDERED: SIZE RATIOS AND COMPETITION , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[69]  B P Gaber,et al.  The art of molecular graphics. It's a matter of scale. , 2000, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[70]  J. Denslow Gap Partitioning among Tropical Rainforest Trees , 1980 .

[71]  James H. Brown,et al.  Body Size and Coexistnce in Desert Rodents: Chance or Community Structure? , 1982 .

[72]  K. Gross,et al.  Fertilization effects on species density and primary productivity in herbaceous plant communities , 2000 .

[73]  P. Abrams Resource Productivity-Consumer Species Diversity: Simple Models of Competition in Spatially Heterogeneous Environments , 1988 .

[74]  M. Willig,et al.  The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness , 1999 .

[75]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[76]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population , 1943 .

[77]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[78]  John Laurent,et al.  The Virgin and the Mousetrap: Essays in Search of the Soul of Science by Chet Raymo, (Viking, New York, 1991), pp. xix + 199, $US18.95, ISBN 0-670-83315-0 , 1992 .

[79]  K. Yoda,et al.  Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions (Intraspecific competition among higher plants. XI) , 1963 .

[80]  H. Cyr,et al.  AN ILLUSION OF MECHANISTIC UNDERSTANDING , 2004 .

[81]  M. Willig,et al.  Randomness, Area, and Species Richness , 1982 .

[82]  S. Scheiner,et al.  Three evolutionary hypotheses for the hump-shaped productivity–diversity curve , 2001 .