A Small but Significant Difference - The Role of Gender on Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies

The current research aimed to study user diversity with a focus on gender differences in adoption of medical assistive technologies in general, and in particular. In order to understand the gender impact, we conducted two consecutive studies and considered gender as a key moderator of acceptance aspects in the medical context. The first study focused on general aspects of medical technology acceptability: users' willingness to use it, the importance of privacy and trust as well as the general attitude across gender and specified age groups. For a deeper insight into this topic the second study was conducted in order to analyze gendered acceptance on specific health-related device. As results showed people's general attitude towards medical technology and their willingness to use such medical assisting devices is throughout positive. However, gender differences emerge at the time when it comes to an assessment of a concrete medical tool (here smart textiles).

[1]  Linda Little,et al.  E-health , 2008, BCS HCI.

[2]  Gary J. Slater,et al.  Concepts, Methods, and Applications , 2011 .

[3]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  User Diversity as a Challenge for the Integration of Medical Technology into Future Smart Home Environments , 2011 .

[4]  M. Skubic,et al.  Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[5]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Accounting for User Diversity in the Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies , 2010, eHealth.

[7]  Carsten Röcker.  Living and Working in Automated Environments Evaluating the Concerns of End-Users in Technology-Enhanced Spaces , 2009 .

[8]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Different Perspectives on Technology Acceptance: The Role of Technology Type and Age , 2009, USAB.

[9]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[10]  Sara Arber,et al.  Understanding gender differences in older people's attitudes towards life-prolonging medical technologies , 2008 .

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[12]  S. Carmel,et al.  Life-sustaining treatments: what doctors do, what they want for themselves and what elderly persons want. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[13]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Technology Acceptance as an Integrative Component of Product Developments in the Medical Technology Sector , 2010 .

[14]  Paul B. Baltes,et al.  The Berlin Aging Study , 1994, Ageing and Society.

[15]  S. Carmel,et al.  The will to live: gender differences among elderly persons. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[16]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-Specific Acceptance Motives , 2009, USAB.

[17]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Gender Differences in Acceptance and Attitudes towards an Invasive Medical Stent , 2011 .

[18]  Adelina Comas-Herrera,et al.  Future demand for long-term care in the UK. A summary of projections of long-term care finance for older people to 2051 , 2004 .

[19]  Mark J. Brosnan,et al.  The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Humans and Automation: System Design and Research Issues , 2002 .

[21]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[22]  Hans-Werner Wahl,et al.  Aging independently : living arrangements and mobility , 2003 .

[23]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[24]  Adelina Comas-Herrera,et al.  Thirty years on: future demand for long-term care in England , 2003 .

[25]  Alexandra M. Freund,et al.  Men and women in the Berlin Aging Study , 2001 .

[26]  Stefanos Gritzalis,et al.  Using Privacy Process Patterns for Incorporating Privacy Requirements into the System Design Process , 2007, The Second International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES'07).

[27]  Ursula Lehr,et al.  Psychologie des Alterns , 1972 .

[28]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Stability of older adults' preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment. , 2003, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[29]  S Meyer,et al.  HOME TECHNOLOGY, SMART HOMES, AND THE AGING USER. IN: AGING INDEPENDENTLY. LIVING ARRANGEMENTS AND MOBILITY , 2003 .

[30]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  Personal Healthcare Devices , 2006 .

[31]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Human factors considerations in implementing telemedicine systems to accommodate older adults , 2007, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.

[32]  Brian M. Kleiner,et al.  Empirically understanding trust in medical technology , 2009 .

[33]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Technology acceptability for medical assistance , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[34]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Acceptance of pervasive healthcare systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts , 2010, 2010 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare.

[35]  Adelina Comas-Herrera,et al.  Future demand for long-term care, 2002 to 2041: Projections of demand for older people in England , 2006 .

[36]  Letitia Anne Peplau,et al.  Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy. , 1984 .

[37]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[38]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Technical Expertise and Its Influence on the Acceptance of Future Medical Technologies: What Is Influencing What to Which Extent? , 2010, USAB.

[39]  Klaus Miesenberger,et al.  HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion, 5th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society, USAB 2009, Linz, Austria, November 9-10, 2009 Proceedings , 2009, USAB.

[40]  T. Busch.  Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers , 1995 .

[41]  Marjolein Drent,et al.  Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..