Improvements in measuring shoulder joint kinematics.

For many clinical applications it is necessary to non-invasively determine shoulder motion during dynamic movements, and in such cases skin markers are favoured. However, as skin markers may not accurately track the underlying bone motion the methods currently used must be refined. Furthermore, to determine the motion of the shoulder a model is required to relate the obtained marker trajectories to the shoulder kinematics. In Wu et al. (2005) the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) proposed a shoulder model based on the position of bony landmarks. A limitation of the ISB recommendations is that the reference positions of the shoulder joints are not standardized. The aims of this research project were to develop a method to accurately determine shoulder kinematics using skin markers, and to investigate the effect of introduction of a standardized reference configuration. Fifteen subjects, free from shoulder pathology, performed arm elevations while skin marker trajectories were tracked. Shoulder kinematics were reconstructed using a chain model and extended Kalman filter. The results revealed significant differences between the kinematics obtained with and without introduction of the reference configuration. The curves of joint angle tended towards 0° for 0° of humerus elevation when the reference configuration was introduced. In conclusion, the shoulder kinematics obtained with introduction of the reference configuration were found to be easier to interpret than those obtained without introduction of the reference configuration.

[1]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[2]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Sylvain Brochard,et al.  Double calibration: an accurate, reliable and easy-to-use method for 3D scapular motion analysis. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Laurence Chèze,et al.  Rotation sequence as an important factor in shoulder kinematics. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[5]  Bruce C Elliott,et al.  System and modelling errors in motion analysis: implications for the measurement of the elbow angle in cricket bowling. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  G Ferrigno,et al.  Robust recovery of human motion from video using Kalman filters and virtual humans. , 2003, Human movement science.

[7]  Annie Levasseur,et al.  The effect of axis alignment on shoulder joint kinematics analysis during arm abduction. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  R. Dumas,et al.  Effect of axis alignment on in vivo shoulder kinematics , 2011, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[9]  A R Karduna,et al.  Dynamic measurements of three-dimensional scapular kinematics: a validation study. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[11]  François Prince,et al.  Can one angle be simply subtracted from another to determine range of motion in three-dimensional motion analysis? , 2014, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[12]  W. Taylor,et al.  A survey of formal methods for determining the centre of rotation of ball joints. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Jessica K. Hodgins,et al.  Automatic Joint Parameter Estimation from Magnetic Motion Capture Data , 2023, Graphics Interface.

[14]  E Roux,et al.  Evaluation of the global optimisation method within the upper limb kinematics analysis. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  J J O'Connor,et al.  Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.