Sampling uncertainty in medical research.

OBJECTIVE Statistical analysis is ubiquitous in medical research, but fundamental statistical principles are not always well understood, which has negative effects for both authors and readers of scientific papers. The purpose of this brief review is to provide a methodological overview on populations, samples, analysis units and sampling uncertainty to facilitate an increased understanding of statistical concepts.

[1]  T. Lunsford,et al.  The Research Sample, Part I: Sampling , 1995 .

[2]  D N Glaser.  The controversy of significance testing: misconceptions and alternatives. , 1999, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[3]  A. Vail,et al.  Common statistical errors in the design and analysis of subfertility trials. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[4]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[5]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Thomas R. Lunsford,et al.  The Research Sample, Part II: Sample Size , 1995 .

[7]  G. Guyatt,et al.  How many patients? How many limbs? Analysis of patients or limbs in the orthopaedic literature: a systematic review. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  J. Ranstam,et al.  Health-care quality registers: outcome-orientated ranking of hospitals is unreliable. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  Takashi Omori,et al.  Statistical issues in the use of the comet assay. , 2008, Mutagenesis.