Atom density in protein structures.

The residue environment in protein structures is studied with respect to the density of carbon (C), oxygen (O), and nitrogen (N) atoms within a certain distance (say 5 A) of each residue. Two types of environments are evaluated: one based on side-chain atom contacts (abbreviated S-S) and the other based on all atom (side-chain + backbone) contacts (abbreviated A-A). Different atom counts are observed about nine-residue structural categories defined by three solvent accessibility levels and three secondary structure states. Among the structural categories, the S-S atom count ratios generally vary more than the A-A atom count ratios because of the fact that the backbone (O) and (N) atoms contribute equal counts. Secondary structure affects the (C) density for the A-A contacts whereas secondary structure has little influence on the (C) density for the S-S contacts. For S-S contacts, a greater density of (O) over (N) atom neighbors stands out in the environment of most amino acid types. By contrast, for A-A contacts, independent of the solvent accessibility levels, the ratio (O)/(N) is approximately 1 in helical states, consistent with the geometry of alpha-helical residues whose side-chains tilt oppositely to the amino to carboxy alpha-helical axis. The highest ratio of neighbor (O)/(N) is achieved under solvent exposed conditions. This (O) vs. (N) prevalence is advantageous at the protein surface that generally exhibits an acid excess that helps to enhance protein solubility in the cell and to avoid nonspecific interactions with phosphate groups of DNA, RNA, and other plasma constituents.

[1]  D. Brutlag,et al.  Discovering structural correlations in α‐helices , 1994 .

[2]  G. Rose,et al.  Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. , 1985, Science.

[3]  S Karlin,et al.  Clusters of charged residues in protein three-dimensional structures. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  L. Pauling.  The Nature Of The Chemical Bond , 1939 .

[5]  G. Lienhard,et al.  Glucose transport across plasma membranes: facilitated diffusion systems , 1981 .

[6]  T. Mizuno,et al.  His-Asp phosphotransfer signal transduction. , 1998, Journal of biochemistry.

[7]  S Karlin,et al.  Measures of residue density in protein structures. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  G. Fasman.  Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation , 2012, Springer US.

[9]  B. V. van Gelder,et al.  The interaction between heme and protein in cytochrome c1. , 1983, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[10]  C. Branden,et al.  Introduction to protein structure , 1991 .

[11]  S Karlin,et al.  Measuring residue associations in protein structures. Possible implications for protein folding. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  S. Hanks,et al.  Protein kinase catalytic domain sequence database: identification of conserved features of primary structure and classification of family members. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[13]  J. Berg.  Zinc finger domains: hypotheses and current knowledge. , 1990, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.