Development and application of an elastic net logistic regression model to investigate the impact of cardiac substructure dose on radiation-induced pericardial effusion in patients with NSCLC

Abstract Background Typically, cardiac substructures are neither delineated nor analyzed during radiation treatment planning. Therefore, we developed a novel machine learning model to evaluate the impact of cardiac substructure dose for predicting radiation-induced pericardial effusion (PCE). Materials and methods One-hundred and forty-one stage III NSCLC patients, who received radiation therapy in a prospective clinical trial, were included in this analysis. The impact of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics (mean and max dose, V5Gy[%]–V70Gy[%]) for the whole heart, left and right atrium, and left and right ventricle, on pericardial effusion toxicity (≥grade 2, CTCAE v4.0 grading) were examined. Elastic net logistic regression, using repeat cross-validation (n = 100 iterations, 75%/25% training/test set data split), was conducted with cardiac-based DVH metrics as covariates. The following model types were constructed and analyzed: (i) standard model type, which only included whole-heart DVH metrics; and (ii) a model type trained with both whole-heart and substructure DVH metrics. Model performance was analyzed on the test set using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, calibration slope and calibration intercept. A final fitted model, based on the optimal model type, was developed from the entire study population for future comparisons. Results Grade 2 PCE incidence was 49.6% (n = 70). Models using whole heart and substructure dose had the highest performance (median values: AUC = 0.820; calibration slope/intercept = 1.356/−0.235; accuracy = 0.743) and outperformed the standard whole-heart only model type (median values: AUC = 0.799; calibration slope/intercept = 2.456/−0.729; accuracy = 0.713). The final fitted elastic net model showed high performance in predicting PCE (median values: AUC = 0.879; calibration slope/intercept = 1.352/−0.174; accuracy = 0.801). Conclusions We developed and evaluated elastic net regression toxicity models of radiation-induced PCE. We found the model type that included cardiac substructure dose had superior predictive performance. A final toxicity model that included cardiac substructure dose metrics was developed and reported for comparison with external datasets.

[1]  Timothy Solberg,et al.  Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers , 2018, Medical physics.

[2]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Bayesian Adaptive Randomization Trial of Passive Scattering Proton Therapy and Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Jung Hun Oh,et al.  Incorporating spatial dose metrics in machine learning-based normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models of severe acute dysphagia resulting from head and neck radiotherapy , 2017, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[4]  M. Socinski,et al.  Heart dosimetric analysis of three types of cardiac toxicity in patients treated on dose-escalation trials for Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[5]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Dosimetric comparison to the heart and cardiac substructure in a large cohort of esophageal cancer patients treated with proton beam therapy or Intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  D. Gomez,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Pericardial Effusion After Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  R. Mohan,et al.  A Novel Methodology using CT Imaging Biomarkers to Quantify Radiation Sensitivity in the Esophagus with Application to Clinical Trials , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[8]  M. Socinski,et al.  Cardiac Toxicity After Radiotherapy for Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Dose-Escalation Trials Delivering 70 to 90 Gy. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  R. Mohan,et al.  (18)F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Can Quantify and Predict Esophageal Injury During Radiation Therapy. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  P. Thall,et al.  Bayesian regression analyses of radiation modality effects on pericardial and pleural effusion and survival in esophageal cancer. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Ulrike Schick,et al.  Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling using spatial dose metrics and machine learning methods for severe acute oral mucositis resulting from head and neck radiotherapy. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  J. Bourhis,et al.  Coronary stenosis risk analysis following Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy: A study based on patient specific artery segments dose calculation. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  W. Curran,et al.  Standard-dose versus high-dose conformal radiotherapy with concurrent and consolidation carboplatin plus paclitaxel with or without cetuximab for patients with stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (RTOG 0617): a randomised, two-by-two factorial phase 3 study. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  Laurence Court,et al.  Automatic contouring of brachial plexus using a multi-atlas approach for lung cancer radiation therapy. , 2013, Practical radiation oncology.

[15]  M. Salvatore,et al.  Multivariate normal tissue complication probability modeling of heart valve dysfunction in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Y. Adler,et al.  Management of pericardial effusion. , 2013, European heart journal.

[17]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Impact of statistical learning methods on the predictive power of multivariate normal tissue complication probability models. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Hans Garmo,et al.  Distribution of coronary artery stenosis after radiation for breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  S. Osawa,et al.  Treatment with Corticosteroid for Pericardial Effusion in a Patient with Advanced Synchronous Esophageal and Gastric Cancers following Chemoradiotherapy , 2010, Case Reports in Gastroenterology.

[20]  V. Ferrari,et al.  Association between tangential beam treatment parameters and cardiac abnormalities after definitive radiation treatment for left-sided breast cancer. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Wei-Ting Hwang,et al.  Coronary artery findings after left-sided compared with right-sided radiation treatment for early-stage breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[23]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[24]  Vitali Moiseenko,et al.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the heart. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .