Welcome Back? Job Performance and Turnover of Boomerang Employees Compared to Internal and External Hires

“Boomerang” employees are workers who leave an organization and are later rehired by that same organization. Although many organizations rehire former employees, only a handful of studies have examined this phenomenon. The present study uses a large, longitudinal data set to examine the performance and turnover of boomerang employees rehired into management positions (n = 1,318). Further, we provide some of the first comparisons between boomerang employees and two traditional sources of employees: external hires (n = 20,850) and internal promotions (n = 8,546). Evaluations of job performance before and after being rehired revealed that boomerang managers’ performance tended to remain the same—rather than increase or decrease—after being rehired. Furthermore, boomerang managers performed similarly to internally and externally hired managers in the first year on the job, but both internal and external hires improved more than rehires over time. Internal and external hires were also less likely to turn over from the organization than rehires. Finally, supplemental analyses indicated that boomerang managers who turned over a second time tended to do so for reasons similar to their initial turnover reasons. The overall results call into question some of the assumed benefits of rehiring and suggest that organizations consider factors such as the reason for initial departure, the time horizon of performance, and the availability of other types of hires before considering boomerang employees.

[1]  Joseph V. Hanna,et al.  The dissatisfied worker , 1931 .

[2]  G. Becker,et al.  Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition , 1993 .

[3]  P. F. Wernimont,et al.  Signs, samples, and criteria. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  H. White,et al.  Chains of Opportunity , 2014 .

[5]  E. Ghiselli Some perspectives for industrial psychology. , 1974 .

[6]  Allen C. Bludedorn A Taxonomy of Turnover , 1978 .

[7]  John P. Wanous,et al.  REALISTIC JOB PREVIEWS: CAN A PROCEDURE TO REDUCE TURNOVER ALSO INFLUENCE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABILITIES AND PERFORMANCE? , 1978 .

[8]  James E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Tournament Mobility: Career Patterns in a Corporation. , 1979 .

[9]  M R Louis,et al.  Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. , 1980, Administrative science quarterly.

[10]  S. Maxwell,et al.  On Using Analysis Of Covariance In Repeated Measures Designs. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[11]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Turnover Overstated: The Functional Taxonomy , 1982 .

[12]  N. Schmitt,et al.  OPERATIONALIZING THE “BEHAVIORAL CONSISTENCY” APPROACH: SELECTION TEST DEVELOPMENT BASED ON A CONTENT‐ORIENTED STRATEGY , 1986 .

[13]  Alice N. Outerbridge,et al.  Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance , 1986 .

[14]  I. B. Helburn,et al.  The Relationship of Seniority to Job Performance Following Reinstatement , 1986 .

[15]  P. Ackerman Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. , 1987 .

[16]  S. Zedeck,et al.  Relations Between Measures of Typical and Maximum Job Performance , 1988 .

[17]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  Job Satisfaction: Environmental and Genetic Components , 1989 .

[18]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  Meaning and measurement of turnover: Comparison of alternative measures and recommendations for research. , 1991 .

[19]  Susan S. Kirschenbaum,et al.  Influence of experience on information-gathering strategies , 1992 .

[20]  Elizabeth C. Ravlin,et al.  EFFECTS OF PREVIOUS JOB EXPOSURE AND SUBSEQUENT JOB STATUS ON THE FUNCTIONING OF A REALISTIC JOB PREVIEW , 1993 .

[21]  S. Gilliland The Perceived Fairness of Selection Systems: An Organizational Justice Perspective , 1993 .

[22]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Cognitive and noncognitive determinants and consequences of complex skill acquisition. , 1995 .

[23]  W. Mischel,et al.  A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. , 1995, Psychological review.

[24]  Is the Past Prologue?: A Test of Ghiselli’s Hobo Syndrome , 1995 .

[25]  W. Chan External Recruitment versus Internal Promotion , 1996, Journal of Labor Economics.

[26]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings , 1996 .

[27]  Meghna Virick,et al.  Working without a net: Time, performance, and turnover under maximally contingent rewards , 1996 .

[28]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. , 1998 .

[29]  David Chan,et al.  The Conceptualization and Analysis of Change Over Time: An Integrative Approach Incorporating Longitudinal Mean and Covariance Structures Analysis (LMACS) and Multiple Indicator Latent Growth Modeling (MLGM) , 1998 .

[30]  Jean M. Phillips Effects of Realistic Job Previews on Multiple Organizational Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis , 1998 .

[31]  Jean M. Phillips EFFECTS OF REALISTIC JOB PREVIEWS ON MULTIPLE ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES: A META-ANALYSIS , 1998 .

[32]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[33]  D. Woltz,et al.  Negative transfer errors in sequential cognitive skills: strong-but-wrong sequence application. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  The Stability of Individual Differences in Mental Ability from Childhood to Old Age: Follow-up of the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey , 2000 .

[35]  Chris J. Sablynski,et al.  WHY PEOPLE STAY: USING JOB EMBEDDEDNESS TO PREDICT VOLUNTARY TURNOVER , 2001 .

[36]  Are female managers quitters? The relationships of gender, promotions, and family leaves of absence to voluntary turnover. , 2001 .

[37]  Paul J. Taylor,et al.  Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta‐analytic comparison of situational and past behaviour employment interview questions , 2002 .

[38]  Eric Anthony Day,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE CRITERION‐RELATED VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER DIMENSIONS , 2003 .

[39]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Cognitive and Noncognitive Determinants and Consequences of Complex Skill Acquisition , 2004 .

[40]  Kenneth A Bollen,et al.  The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. , 2004, Psychological methods.

[41]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[42]  Philip L. Roth,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF WORK SAMPLE TEST VALIDITY: UPDATING AND INTEGRATING SOME CLASSIC LITERATURE , 2005 .

[43]  B. Roberts,et al.  Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Troy V. Mumford,et al.  The leadership skills strataplex: Leadership skill requirements across organizational levels , 2007 .

[45]  Daniel A. Newman Missing data techniques and low response rates: The role of systematic nonresponse parameters , 2008 .

[46]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  EMPLOYEES' CHALLENGING JOB EXPERIENCES AND SUPERVISORS' EVALUATIONS OF PROMOTABILITY , 2009 .

[47]  Nancy P. Rothbard,et al.  Unpacking Prior Experience: How Career History Affects Job Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[48]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Developing leaders via experience: the role of developmental challenge, learning orientation, and feedback availability. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Structural Equations Modeling: Fit Indices, Sample Size, and Advanced Topics , 2010 .

[50]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Acquiring and Developing Human Capital in Service Contexts: The Interconnectedness of Human Capital Resources , 2011 .

[51]  R. Coff,et al.  Invited Editorial: Drilling for Micro-Foundations of Human Capital–Based Competitive Advantages , 2011 .

[52]  Matthew J. Bidwell,et al.  Paying More to Get Less , 2011 .

[53]  Paul E. Tesluk,et al.  DEVELOPING EXECUTIVE LEADERS: THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF COGNITIVE ABILITY, PERSONALITY, AND THE ACCUMULATION OF WORK EXPERIENCE IN PREDICTING STRATEGIC THINKING COMPETENCY , 2011 .

[54]  Peter Y. Chen,et al.  Physical Capabilities and Occupational Health of Older Workers , 2012 .

[55]  Kaifeng Jiang,et al.  When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? a meta-analytic investigation. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  G. C. Thornton,et al.  Work sample tests. , 2013 .

[57]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  The Story of Why We Stay: A Review of Job Embeddedness , 2014 .

[58]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Gone Today but here Tomorrow: Extending the Unfolding Model of Turnover to Consider Boomerang Employees , 2014 .

[59]  Jeremy M. Beus,et al.  Adjusting to new work teams: Testing work experience as a multidimensional resource for newcomers , 2014 .

[60]  Richard G. Gardner,et al.  Employees on the Rebound: Extending the Careers Literature to Include Boomerang Employment , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  Chad H. Van Iddekinge,et al.  Build or Buy? The Individual and Unit-Level Performance of Internally Versus Externally Selected Managers Over Time , 2018, The Journal of applied psychology.

[62]  nasa,et al.  A Boom in Boomerangs , 2019 .

[63]  P. Roth,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the criterion‐related validity of prehire work experience , 2019, Personnel Psychology.