Stakeholder preferences for Danish fisheries management of sand eel and Norway pout

Management of the fisheries for non-human consumption species in the North Sea has become increasingly politicised, with a growing number of stakeholders seeking influence over the decision-making process. In relation to management of the sand eel and Norway pout fisheries, two different issues are discussed. Conservationists and fishermen targeting fish for human consumption argue that particularly the sand eel fishery is reducing the forage for sea birds and other fish stocks. In the Norway pout fishery, the clash of interest is a classic example of a conflict within fisheries (national or international) due to large by-catch of primarily haddock and whiting. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) has been applied to evaluate the preference of the various stakeholders for management of these fisheries. The AHP was undertaken through conducting a questionnaire survey supplemented with interviews among 12 stakeholders in Denmark and the UK, representing industry organisations, conservation groups, management authorities and fisheries research institutions.

[1]  Jesper Raakjær,et al.  The Fisheries Co-management Experience: accomplishments, Challenges and Prospects , 2003 .

[2]  S. Cunningham,et al.  Successful fisheries management : issues, case studies and perspectives , 2005 .

[3]  Ines Herrero,et al.  Objectives of fisheries management: case studies from the UK, France, Spain and Denmark , 2002 .

[4]  P. Leung,et al.  Evaluating fisheries management options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) 1 Senior au , 1998 .

[5]  Sajjad Zahir,et al.  Clusters in a group: Decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Jesper Raakjær,et al.  The Fisheries Co-management Experience , 2003, Fish and Fisheries Series.

[7]  James A. Crutchfield,et al.  Economic and Political Objectives in Fishery Management , 1973 .

[8]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications , 1986 .

[9]  K. Wunderlich Wilson, Douglas Clyde, Jesper Raakjaer Nielsen and Poul Degnbol, eds.,The Fisheries Co-management Experience: Accomplishments, Challenges, and Prospects , 2004 .

[10]  G. Brundtland World summit on sustainable development , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  P. Degnbol Indicators as a means of communicating knowledge , 2005 .

[12]  K. Soma,et al.  How to involve stakeholders in fisheries management : a country case study in Trinidad and Tobago , 2003 .

[13]  Anthony Charles,et al.  Bio-socio-economic fishery models: labour dynamics and multi-objective management , 1989 .

[14]  Poul Degnbol,et al.  Fisheries co-management—an institutional innovation? Lessons from South East Asia and Southern Africa , 2004 .

[15]  C. Carlsson,et al.  AHP in Political Group Decisions: A Study in the Art of Possibilities , 1995 .