Augmentation of Wall Shear Stress Inhibits Neointimal Hyperplasia After Stent Implantation: Inhibition Through Reduction of Inflammation?

Background—Low wall shear stress (WSS) increases neointimal hyperplasia (NH) in vein grafts and stents. We studied the causal relationship between WSS and NH formation in stents by locally increasing WSS with a flow divider (Anti-Restenotic Diffuser, Endoart SA) placed in the center of the stent. Methods and Results—In 9 rabbits fed a high-cholesterol diet for 2 months to induce endothelial dysfunction, 18 stents were implanted in the right and left external iliac arteries (1 stent per vessel). Lumen diameters were measured by quantitative angiography before and after implantation and at 4-week follow-up, at which time, macrophage accumulation and interruption of the internal elastic lamina was determined. Cross sections of stent segments within the ARED (S+ARED), outside the ARED (S[minus]ARED), and in corresponding segments of the contralateral control stent (SCTRL) were analyzed. Changes in WSS induced by the ARED placement were derived by computational fluid dynamics. Computational fluid dynamics analysis demonstrated that WSS increased from 0.38 to 0.82 N/m2 in the S+ARED immediately after ARED placement. This augmentation of shear stress was accompanied by (1) lower mean late luminal loss by quantitative angiography ([minus]0.23±0.22 versus [minus]0.58±0.30 mm, P =0.02), (2) reduction in NH (1.48±0.58, 2.46±1.25, and 2.36±1.13 mm2, P <0.01, respectively, for S+ARED, S[minus]ARED, and SCTRL), and (3) a reduced inflammation score and a reduced injury score. Increments in shear stress did not change the relationship between injury score and NH or between inflammation score and NH. Conclusions—The newly developed ARED flow divider significantly increases WSS, and this local increment in WSS is accompanied by a local reduction in NH and a local reduction in inflammation and injury. The present study is therefore the first to provide direct evidence for an important modulating role of shear stress in in-stent neointimal hyperplasia.

[1]  P. Libby,et al.  Expression of the elastolytic cathepsins S and K in human atheroma and regulation of their production in smooth muscle cells. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  G. Hansson Regulation of Immune Mechanisms in Atherosclerosis , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J J Wentzel,et al.  Relationship Between Neointimal Thickness and Shear Stress After Wallstent Implantation in Human Coronary Arteries , 2001, Circulation.

[4]  P. Serruys,et al.  Randomized trials of coronary stenting. , 1994, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[5]  R. Guidoin,et al.  Luminal surface concentration of lipoprotein (LDL) and its effect on the wall uptake of cholesterol by canine carotid arteries. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[6]  D. Ku,et al.  Hemodynamic consequences of carotid-carotid bypass for innominate artery stenosis. , 1991, Journal of vascular surgery.

[7]  B L Langille,et al.  Expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and monocyte adherence in arteries exposed to altered shear stress. , 1995, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[8]  M. Leon,et al.  In-stent restenosis: contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  T. Karino,et al.  Visualization of flow-dependent concentration polarization of macromolecules at the surface of a cultured endothelial cell monolayer by means of fluorescence microscopy. , 2000, Biorheology.

[10]  B. Helmke,et al.  Hemodynamics and the focal origin of atherosclerosis: a spatial approach to endothelial structure, gene expression, and function. , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  R. Virmani,et al.  Stent design favorably influences the vascular response in normal porcine coronary arteries. , 1999, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[13]  C J Slager,et al.  Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II). , 1993, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.

[14]  Brian P. Helmke,et al.  Hemodynamics and the Focal Origin of Atherosclerosis , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  J J Wentzel,et al.  Coronary stent implantation changes 3-D vessel geometry and 3-D shear stress distribution. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  G. Garcı́a-Cardeña,et al.  Endothelial Dysfunction, Hemodynamic Forces, and Atherogenesis a , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  P D Verdouw,et al.  Increasing arterial wall injury after long-term implantation of two types of stent in a porcine coronary model. , 1998, European heart journal.

[18]  G. Richter,et al.  Relationship between blood flow, thrombus, and neointima in stents. , 1999, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[19]  D. Hayoz,et al.  Influence of oscillatory and unidirectional flow environments on the expression of endothelin and nitric oxide synthase in cultured endothelial cells. , 1998, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.