Hierarchical Decomposition and Multidomain Formulation for the Design of Complex Sustainable Systems

Designing a large-scale complex system, such as a city of the future, with a focus on sustainability requires a systematic approach toward integrated design of all subsystems. Domains such as buildings, transportation, energy, and water are all coupled. Designing each one in isolation can lead to suboptimality where sustainability is achieved in one aspect but at the expense of other aspects. Traditional ad hoc allocations of design parameter precedence and dependence cannot be used for cases where new (instead of only mature) architectures are to be explored. A methodology is introduced for addressing design problems of complex sustainable systems that is comprised of, on the one hand, a hierarchical decomposition that includes multilevel abstraction and design parameter identification, and on the other hand, a multidomain formulation, which includes parameter dependency identification, design cycle identification and decision structuring, and scoping. The application of the methodology for the design of a new urban development, Masdar City in Abu Dhabi, with over 220 different form and behavior parameter sets is shown.

[1]  Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[2]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Binary Matrices in System Modeling , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[3]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  On an Axiomatic Approach to Manufacturing and Manufacturing Systems , 1978 .

[4]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[5]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[6]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Model-based Approaches to Managing Concurrent Engineering , 1991 .

[7]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Generalized models of design iteration using signal flow graphs , 1995 .

[8]  Mark W. Maier Architecting Principles for Systems‐of‐Systems , 1996 .

[9]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Generalised models of design interation using signal flow graphs , 1997 .

[10]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Collaborative Approach to Launch Vehicle Design , 1997 .

[11]  Richard J. Balling,et al.  Optimizing Transportation Infrastructure Planning with a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm Model , 1999 .

[12]  Dennis M. Buede,et al.  The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods , 1999 .

[13]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[14]  Lawrence D. Pohlmann,et al.  The Engineering Design of Systems – Models and Methods , 2000 .

[15]  Soo-Haeng Cho,et al.  An integrated method for managing complex engineering projects using the design structure matrix and advanced simulation , 2001 .

[16]  Dov Dori,et al.  Object-Process Methodology , 2002, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[17]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Characterizing complex product architectures , 2004, Syst. Eng..

[18]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Imparting desired attributes in structural design by means of multi-objective optimization , 2005 .

[19]  青島 矢一,et al.  書評 カーリス Y. ボールドウィン/キム B. クラーク著 安藤晴彦訳『デザイン・ルール:モジュール化パワー』 Carliss Y. Baldwin & Kim B. Clark/Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity , 2005 .

[20]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices , 2007 .

[22]  Dennis M. Buede,et al.  The Engineering Design of Systems , 2009 .

[23]  Martin Spieck,et al.  MDO: assessment and direction for advancement—an opinion of one international group , 2009 .

[24]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Methods for Analyzing Design Procedures , 2011 .