The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project.

OBJECTIVE The Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project sought to assess models of community-based diabetes care and use of a diabetes electronic management system (DEMS). Planned care is a redesigned model of chronic disease care that involves guideline implementation, support of self-management, and use of clinical information systems. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied adult diabetic patients attending three primary care practice sites in Wisconsin and Minnesota. We implemented planned care at all sites and DEMS in the practice of 16 primary care providers. We assessed quality of diabetes care using standard indicators for 200 patients randomly selected from each site at baseline and at 24 months of implementation. We used multivariable analyses to estimate the association between planned care and DEMS and each quality indicator. RESULTS Planned care was associated with improvements in measurement of HbA(1c) (odds ratio 7.0 [95% CI 4.2-11.6]), HDL cholesterol (5.6 [4.1-7.5]), and microalbuminuria (5.3 [3.5-8.0]), as well as the provision of tobacco advice (6.9 [4.7-10.1]), among other performance measures. DEMS use was associated with improvements in all indicators, including microalbuminuria (3.2 [1.9-5.2]), retinal examination (2.4 [1.5-3.9]), foot examinations (2.3 [1.2-4.4]), and self-management support (2.6 [1.7-3.8]). Although planned care was associated with improvements in metabolic control, we observed no additional metabolic benefit when providers used DEMS. CONCLUSIONS Planned care was associated with improved performance and metabolic outcomes in primary care. DEMS use augmented the impact of planned care on performance outcomes but not on metabolic outcomes. Optimal identification of the best translation of evidence to diabetes practice will require longer follow-up or new care-delivery models.

[1]  V. Montori,et al.  Information systems in diabetes: in search of the holy grail in the era of evidence-based diabetes care. , 2001, Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association.

[2]  L Joyner,et al.  ADA's (American Diabetes Association) provider recognition program. , 1997, HMO practice.

[3]  Brian T. Austin,et al.  Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. , 1996, The Milbank quarterly.

[4]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[5]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[6]  G. van der Wal,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of a quality improvement program for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[7]  D. Levy,et al.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. , 1998, Circulation.

[8]  J. Hedlund,et al.  Effects of a large-scale intervention with influenza and 23-valent pneumococcal vaccines in adults aged 65 years or older: a prospective study , 2001, The Lancet.

[9]  M. Davidson,et al.  Effect of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Care Program in a Free Medical Clinic , 2000, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.

[10]  Colum A. Gorman,et al.  DEMS - a second generation diabetes electronic management system , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[11]  S. Griffin,et al.  Diabetes care in general practice: meta-analysis of randomised control trials. , 1998, BMJ.

[12]  N. Baskerville,et al.  Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care. , 2001, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[13]  R A Rizza,et al.  Towards an optimal model for community-based diabetes care: design and baseline data from the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. , 2000, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[14]  J. Sidorov,et al.  Disease management for diabetes mellitus: impact on hemoglobin A1c. , 2000, The American journal of managed care.

[15]  W. Assendelft,et al.  Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[16]  M Hørder,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of structured personal care of type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  R. Glasgow,et al.  Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. , 2002, Health services research.

[18]  G. Nichols,et al.  Case-control study of 10 years of comprehensive diabetes care. , 2000, The Western journal of medicine.