A Stakeholder Analysis of the klia2 Airport Terminal Project

Managing an airport terminal project is complex, due to a large number of stakeholders involved. Airport stakeholders include many organisations and individuals, making it a collaborative service environment. Stakeholder theory denotes that organisation should strive to create value for all its stakeholders without the need to trade off. The purpose of this study is to identify the respondents to measure the collective perspectives of the klia2 airport terminal project.  This is an overview of the literature relating to the stakeholder theory and identification of the stakeholders for an airport terminal project in general and specifically for the klia2 terminal. © 2016. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creative commons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. Keywords: Stakeholder theory; Airport stakeholders; Airport terminal; Project management

[1]  Zuzana Dohnalová,et al.  Corporate Stakeholder Management , 2014 .

[2]  K. Davis.  Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success , 2014 .

[3]  Konrad Spang,et al.  The Importance of Project Management in the Planning Process of Transport Infrastructure Projects in Germany , 2014 .

[4]  Rohana Kamaruddin,et al.  Customer Expectations and its Relationship Towards Public Transport in Klang Valley , 2017 .

[5]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[6]  Stephen O. Ogunlana,et al.  Construction professionals' perception of critical success factors for large‐scale construction projects , 2009 .

[7]  Kathryn M. Zuckweiler,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF HOSPITAL PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESS , 2010 .

[8]  Andrew Davies,et al.  From hero to hubris – Reconsidering the project management of Heathrow’s Terminal 5 , 2010 .

[9]  Naziaty Mohd Yaacob,et al.  Malaysian Perspective on the Development of Accessible Design , 2012 .

[10]  Peter Finch,et al.  Applying the Slevin-Pinto Project Implementation Profile to an Information Systems Project , 2003 .

[11]  Vesna Popovic,et al.  Challenges in passenger terminal design: A conceptual model of passenger experience , 2012 .

[12]  Carlos F. Gomes,et al.  The effects of service quality dimensions and passenger characteristics on passenger's overall satisfaction with an airport , 2015 .

[13]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Forecasting Success on Large Projects: Developing Reliable Scales to Predict Multiple Perspectives by Multiple Stakeholders over Multiple Time Frames , 2012 .

[14]  Robbert Kivits,et al.  Multi-dimensional stakeholder analysis : a methodology applied to Australian capital city airports , 2013 .

[15]  Tettet Fitrijanti.  Index of the Company's Stakeholders Welfare☆ , 2015 .

[16]  Anandasivakumar Ekambaram,et al.  Stakeholder Benefit Assessment – Project Success through Management of Stakeholders , 2014 .

[17]  S. Key.  Toward a new theory of the firm: a critique of stakeholder “theory” , 1999 .

[18]  Mohammed K. Fageha,et al.  Managing Project Scope Definition to Improve Stakeholders’ Participation and Enhance Project Outcome , 2013 .

[19]  Simone de Colle,et al.  Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art , 2010 .

[20]  James A. Stieb.  Assessing Freeman’s Stakeholder Theory , 2009 .

[21]  Anil Bilgihan,et al.  Airport service quality drivers of passenger satisfaction. , 2013 .