Global dayside ionospheric uplift and enhancement associated with interplanetary electric fields

[1] The interplanetary shock/electric field event of 5–6 November 2001 is analyzed using ACE interplanetary data. The consequential ionospheric effects are studied using GPS receiver data from the CHAMP and SAC-C satellites and altimeter data from the TOPEX/Poseidon satellite. Data from ∼100 ground-based GPS receivers as well as Brazilian Digisonde and Pacific sector magnetometer data are also used. The dawn-to-dusk interplanetary electric field was initially ∼33 mV/m just after the forward shock (IMF BZ = −48 nT) and later reached a peak value of ∼54 mV/m 1 hour and 40 min later (BZ = −78 nT). The electric field was ∼45 mV/m (BZ = −65 nT) 2 hours after the shock. This electric field generated a magnetic storm of intensity DST = −275 nT. The dayside satellite GPS receiver data plus ground-based GPS data indicate that the entire equatorial and midlatitude (up to ±50° magnetic latitude (MLAT)) dayside ionosphere was uplifted, significantly increasing the electron content (and densities) at altitudes greater than 430 km (CHAMP orbital altitude). This uplift peaked ∼2 1/2 hours after the shock passage. The effect of the uplift on the ionospheric total electron content (TEC) lasted for 4 to 5 hours. Our hypothesis is that the interplanetary electric field “promptly penetrated” to the ionosphere, and the dayside plasma was convected (by E × B) to higher altitudes. Plasma upward transport/convergence led to a ∼55–60% increase in equatorial ionospheric TEC to values above ∼430 km (at 1930 LT). This transport/convergence plus photoionization of atmospheric neutrals at lower altitudes caused a 21% TEC increase in equatorial ionospheric TEC at ∼1400 LT (from ground-based measurements). During the intense electric field interval, there was a sharp plasma “shoulder” detected at midlatitudes by the GPS receiver and altimeter satellites. This shoulder moves equatorward from −54° to −37° MLAT during the development of the main phase of the magnetic storm. We presume this to be an ionospheric signature of the plasmapause and its motion. The total TEC increase of this shoulder is ∼80%. Part of this increase may be due to a “superfountain effect.” The dayside ionospheric TEC above ∼430 km decreased to values ∼45% lower than quiet day values 7 to 9 hours after the beginning of the electric field event. The total equatorial ionospheric TEC decrease was ∼16%. This decrease occurred both at midlatitudes and at the equator. We presume that thermospheric winds and neutral composition changes produced by the storm-time Joule heating, disturbance dynamo electric fields, and electric fields at auroral and subauroral latitudes are responsible for these decreases.

[1]  Manuel Grande,et al.  Current understanding of magnetic storms: storm-substorm relationships , 1998 .

[2]  J. Bittencourt,et al.  IONIZATION DRIFT VELOCITIES IN THE EQUATORIAL F REGION , 1981 .

[3]  J. Foster,et al.  Average characteristics and activity dependence of the subauroral polarization stream , 2002 .

[4]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Interplanetary shock triggering of nightside geomagnetic activity: Substorms, pseudobreakups, and quiescent events , 2001 .

[5]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  Penetration of high latitude electric fields effects tolow latitude during Sundial 1984 , 1988 .

[6]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Origin of interplanetary southward magnetic fields responsible for major magnetic storms near solar maximum (1978–1979) , 1988 .

[7]  I. Batista,et al.  Equatorial disturbance dynamo electric field longitudinal structure and spread F: A case study from GUAR/EITS Campaigns , 1997 .

[8]  Philip J. Erickson,et al.  Ionospheric signatures of plasmaspheric tails , 2002 .

[9]  L. Stenflo,et al.  Stimulated scattering of intense radio waves in partially ionized space dusty plasmas , 2004 .

[10]  L. Scherliess,et al.  Storm time dependence of equatorial disturbance dynamo zonal electric fields , 1997 .

[11]  H. Takahashi,et al.  Magnetospheric disturbance induced equatorial plasma bubble development and dynamics: A case study in Brazilian sector , 2003 .

[12]  R. Wolf,et al.  An assessment of the role of precipitation in magnetospheric convection , 1978 .

[13]  M. Buonsanto Ionospheric Storms — A Review , 1999 .

[14]  R. Spiro,et al.  Latitudinal variation of perturbation electric fields during magnetically disturbed periods - 1986 Sundial observations and model results , 1990 .

[15]  L. Burlaga,et al.  Interplanetary magnetic clouds at 1 AU , 1982 .

[16]  C. J. Zamlutti,et al.  Responses of the low-latitude ionosphere to very intense geomagnetic storms , 2001 .

[17]  Xueqin Huang,et al.  Plasmaspheric mass loss and refilling as a result of a magnetic storm , 2004 .

[18]  Anthony J. Mannucci,et al.  A global mapping technique for GPS‐derived ionospheric total electron content measurements , 1998 .

[19]  Timothy Fuller-Rowell,et al.  Storm-time changes in the upper atmosphere at low latitudes , 2002 .

[20]  Michel Blanc,et al.  On the control of magnetospheric convection by the spatial distribution of ionospheric conductivities , 1982 .

[21]  Bruce T. Tsurutani,et al.  Criteria of interplanetary parameters causing intense magnetic storms (Dst < −100 nT) , 1987 .

[22]  T. Tanaka,et al.  Effects of an electric field on the dynamical behavior of the ionospheres and its application to the storm time disturbance of the F-layer , 1973 .

[23]  Stephen Tchudi,et al.  A Final Comment. , 1988 .

[24]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Properties of slow magnetic clouds , 2004 .

[25]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  Upper-atmospheric effects of magnetic storms: a brief tutorial , 2000 .

[26]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Effects of intense storms and substorms on the equatorial ionosphere/thermosphere system in the American sector from ground‐based and satellite data , 1997 .

[27]  Michael C. Kelley,et al.  Penetration of the solar wind electric field into the magnetosphere/ionosphere system , 2003 .

[28]  M. Acuna,et al.  The ACE Magnetic Fields Experiment , 1998 .

[29]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Interplanetary shock triggering of substorms: WIND and Polar , 2003 .

[30]  B. Fejer,et al.  Low-latitude ionospheric disturbance electric field effects during the recovery phase of the 19–21 October 1998 magnetic storm , 2003 .

[31]  Bruce T. Tsurutani,et al.  The Interplanetary Causes of Magnetic Storms: A Review , 2013 .

[32]  I. Batista,et al.  Equatorial ionospheric electric fields during magnetospheric disturbances: local time/longitude dependences from recent EITS campaigns , 1995 .

[33]  V. Jordanova,et al.  Modeling of the contribution of electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves to stormtime ring current erosion , 2013 .

[34]  H. W. Kroehl,et al.  What is a geomagnetic storm , 1994 .

[35]  B. Fejer,et al.  Low latitude ionospheric disturbance electric field effects duringthe recovery phase of the October 19-21, 1998 magnetic storm , 2003 .

[36]  T. Hughes,et al.  Auroral zone dayside precipitation during magnetic storm initial phases , 2001 .

[37]  L. Scherliess,et al.  Time dependent response of equatorial ionospheric electric fields to magnetospheric disturbances , 1995 .

[38]  K. Subbarao,et al.  Response of the equatorial ionosphere in the Indian (midnight) sector to the severe magnetic storm of July 15, 2000 , 2002 .

[39]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  The ionospheric disturbance dynamo , 1980 .

[40]  E. R. Paula,et al.  Ionospheric effects of the March 13, 1989, magnetic storm at low and equatorial latitudes , 1991 .

[41]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  Interplanetary Shock Triggering of Substorms , 2000 .

[42]  R. Roble,et al.  Coexistence of ionospheric positive and negative storm phases under northern winter conditions: A case study , 2001 .

[43]  J. W. Griffee,et al.  Solar Wind Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) for the Advanced Composition Explorer , 1998 .

[44]  T. Fuller‐Rowell,et al.  How Does the Thermosphere and Ionosphere React to a Geomagnetic Storm , 2013 .

[45]  D. Southwood The role of hot plasma in magnetospheric convection , 1977 .

[46]  M. A. Abdu,et al.  Major phenomena of the equatorial ionosphere-thermosphere system under disturbed conditions , 1997 .