Controlling action research projects

Action research (AR), which emphasises collaboration between researchers and practitioners, is a qualitative research method that has much potential for the information systems (IS) field. AR studies of IS phenomena are now beginning to be published in the IS research literature. However, the rigour of many AR studies in IS can be improved. When AR has been published, the findings have frequently been emphasised at the expense of the process. In this article, we look at the process in AR projects, and look at some of the key choices and alternatives in controlling AR. We discuss three aspects of control: the procedures for initiating an AR project, those for determining authority within the project, and the degree of formalisation. We analyse seven recent AR projects in IS and from this analysis distil recommendations for determining these control structures.

[1]  Oǵuz N. Babüroǵlu,et al.  Normative Action Research , 1992 .

[2]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[3]  Teresa Waring,et al.  Enhancing clinical and management discourse in ICT implementation , 2002 .

[4]  F. Lau,et al.  A review on the use of action research in information systems studies , 1997 .

[5]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[6]  Stanley Goldberg,et al.  Discovering: Inventing and Solving Problems at the Frontiers of Scientific Knowledge , 1997 .

[7]  Francis Y. Lau,et al.  Research Paper: Building a Virtual Network in a Community Health Research Training Program , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Coping With Systems Risk: Security Planning Models for Management Decision Making , 1998, MIS Q..

[9]  K. Hambridge.  Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[10]  E. Schein.  The clinical perspective in fieldwork , 1987 .

[11]  N. Kock.  Negotiating mutually satisfying IS action research topics with organizations: an analysis of Rapoport’s initiative dilemma , 1997 .

[12]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[13]  Robert J. McQueen,et al.  An Action Research Study of Effects of Asynchronous Groupware Support on Productivity and Outcome Quality in Process Redesign Groups , 1998, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[14]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  System development conflict during the use of an information systems prototyping method of action research: Implications for practice and research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[15]  Steve John Simon,et al.  The reorganization of the information systems of the US Naval Construction Forces: an action research project , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[17]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[18]  P. Clark.  Action research and organizational change , 1972 .

[19]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Information Systems Development Research: An Exploration of Ideas in Practice , 1991, Comput. J..

[20]  Richard Baskerville.  Semantic database prototypes , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[21]  R. Rapoport.  Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[22]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Collaborative Practice Research , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..