A social media text analytics framework for double-loop learning for citizen-centric public services: A case study of a local government Facebook use

Abstract This paper develops a framework for facilitating organizational learning through social media text analytics to enhance citizen-centric public service quality. Theoretically, the framework integrates double-loop learning theory with extant models of e-participation in government. Empirically, the framework is applied to a case study of citizen-to-government online interactions on a local government's department Facebook page. Our findings indicate that the missed double-loop learning opportunity resulted from two factors. First, Facebook government-posts were primarily used to advocate the government agenda by educating citizens to change their recycling behaviors without efforts to learn citizens' needs/questions. Second, this single-loop learning orientation sustained the single-loop learning nature of Facebook citizens' posts, precluding their direct and meaningful participation in the city's recycling governance. New insights generated from the case study suggest the framework's usefulness in showing more promising directions for government's double-loop learning through social media platforms to enhance public service quality.

[1]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A framework for advanced social media exploitation in government for crowdsourcing , 2014 .

[2]  L. Lee-Kelley,et al.  Citizens' attitudes towards e‐government and e‐governance: a UK study , 2008 .

[3]  Michael Parent,et al.  Building Citizen Trust Through E-government , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance , 2005 .

[5]  Wouter Van Dooren,et al.  Better Performance Management , 2011 .

[6]  David M. Blei,et al.  Probabilistic topic models , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[7]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[9]  María Rosalía Vicente,et al.  An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens' online engagement , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Kenisha Garnett,et al.  Effective dialogue: enhanced public engagement as a legitimising tool for municipal waste management decision-making. , 2014, Waste management.

[11]  Suzanne D. Pawlowski,et al.  The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[13]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[14]  A. Whyte,et al.  Towards an evaluation framework for eParticipation , 2008 .

[15]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[16]  P. Shrivastava A TYPOLOGY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING SYSTEMS , 1983 .

[17]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[18]  Kathleen McNutt,et al.  Public engagement in the Web 2.0 era: Social collaborative technologies in a public sector context , 2014 .

[19]  Norman Crolee Dalkey,et al.  An experimental study of group opinion , 1969 .

[20]  Line Dubé,et al.  Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  Stuart W. Shulman E-Rulemaking: Issues in Current Research and Practice [1] , 2005 .

[22]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Learning through ICT-enabled social networks , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[23]  Jooho Lee,et al.  E‐Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government , 2012 .

[24]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Characterizing eParticipation , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[25]  David F. Andersen,et al.  Simulation and Managerial Decision Making:A Double‐Loop Learning Framework , 2013 .

[26]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[28]  George Stylios,et al.  Public Opinion Mining for Governmental Decisions , 2010 .

[29]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Transforminggovernment agencies' approach to eparticipation through efficient exploitation of social media , 2011, ECIS.

[30]  Donald P. Moynihan,et al.  Goal‐Based Learning and the Future of Performance Management , 2005 .

[31]  Kenneth E. Shirley,et al.  LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics , 2014 .

[32]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through Information Technology? A Growing Agenda for Debate , 2003 .

[33]  Vicente Pinilla,et al.  Is E-Government Leading to More Accountable and Transparent Local Governments? An Overall View , 2010 .

[34]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government , 2003, DG.O.

[35]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Citizens' engagement on local governments' Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  V. Karkaletsis,et al.  Passive crowdsourcing in government using social media , 2014 .

[37]  Jeffrey E. Cohen,et al.  Citizen satisfaction with contacting government on the internet , 2006, Inf. Polity.

[38]  Nili Steinfeld,et al.  Local engagement online: Municipal Facebook pages as hubs of interaction , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Making the Undiscussable and Its Undiscussability Discussable , 1980 .

[40]  C. Argyris Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. , 1976 .

[41]  Ioannis A. Tsoukalas,et al.  Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[42]  Jeremy Millard,et al.  User Attitudes to E-Government Citizen Services in Europe , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[43]  David H. Coursey,et al.  Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment , 2008 .

[44]  Curtis L Ventriss,et al.  Organizational Learning and Public Policy: Towards a Substantive Perspective , 1988 .

[45]  Guillaume Bouchard,et al.  Opinion mining in social media: Modeling, simulating, and forecasting political opinions in the web , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[46]  C. Hood,et al.  The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? , 2004 .

[47]  Maureen A. Pirog,et al.  Electronic Funds and Benefits Transfers, E-Government, and the Winter Commission , 2008 .

[48]  Pamela Baxter,et al.  Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers , 2008 .

[49]  Åke Grönlund,et al.  eParticipation research: Systematizing the field , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  Yonghong Wu,et al.  Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  C. Reddick Citizen interaction and e‐government: Evidence for the managerial, consultative, and participatory models , 2011 .

[52]  M. Kamal An analysis of e‐Participation research: moving from theoretical to pragmatic viewpoint , 2009 .

[53]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[54]  Nazura Javed,et al.  Framework for Participative and Collaborative Governance using Social Media Mining Techniques , 2015 .

[55]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[56]  Irwin King,et al.  A brief survey of computational approaches in Social Computing , 2009, 2009 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[57]  Min Song,et al.  Analyzing the Political Landscape of 2012 Korean Presidential Election in Twitter , 2014, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[58]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Government innovation through social media , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[59]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Organizational learning in government sector organizations:literature review , 2009 .

[60]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[61]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[62]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[63]  Forrest V. Morgeson,et al.  Does E‐Government Measure Up to E‐Business? Comparing End User Perceptions of U.S. Federal Government and E‐Business Web Sites , 2009 .

[64]  M. Brown,et al.  Learning Organizations in the Public Sector? A Study of Police Agencies Employing Information and Technology To Advance Knowledge. , 2003 .

[65]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[66]  Robert Elliott,et al.  Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research , 2005 .

[67]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[68]  Pasquale Lops,et al.  CrowdPulse: A framework for real-time semantic analysis of social streams , 2015, Inf. Syst..

[69]  K. V. Andersen,et al.  Costs of e‐participation: the management challenges , 2007 .

[70]  Kristina T. Lambright,et al.  Looking for Friends, Fans, and Followers? Social Media Use in Public and Nonprofit Human Services , 2014 .

[71]  Gregory A. Porumbescu,et al.  ICT as a Buffer to Change , 2013 .

[72]  Oren Etzioni,et al.  Named Entity Recognition in Tweets: An Experimental Study , 2011, EMNLP.