Transcriptional Regulation of Lineage Commitment - A Stochastic Model of Cell Fate Decisions

Molecular mechanisms employed by individual multipotent cells at the point of lineage commitment remain largely uncharacterized. Current paradigms span from instructive to noise-driven mechanisms. Of considerable interest is also whether commitment involves a limited set of genes or the entire transcriptional program, and to what extent gene expression configures multiple trajectories into commitment. Importantly, the transient nature of the commitment transition confounds the experimental capture of committing cells. We develop a computational framework that simulates stochastic commitment events, and affords mechanistic exploration of the fate transition. We use a combined modeling approach guided by gene expression classifier methods that infers a time-series of stochastic commitment events from experimental growth characteristics and gene expression profiling of individual hematopoietic cells captured immediately before and after commitment. We define putative regulators of commitment and probabilistic rules of transition through machine learning methods, and employ clustering and correlation analyses to interrogate gene regulatory interactions in multipotent cells. Against this background, we develop a Monte Carlo time-series stochastic model of transcription where the parameters governing promoter status, mRNA production and mRNA decay in multipotent cells are fitted to experimental static gene expression distributions. Monte Carlo time is converted to physical time using cell culture kinetic data. Probability of commitment in time is a function of gene expression as defined by a logistic regression model obtained from experimental single-cell expression data. Our approach should be applicable to similar differentiating systems where single cell data is available. Within our system, we identify robust model solutions for the multipotent population within physiologically reasonable values and explore model predictions with regard to molecular scenarios of entry into commitment. The model suggests distinct dependencies of different commitment-associated genes on mRNA dynamics and promoter activity, which globally influence the probability of lineage commitment.

[1]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[2]  Tariq Enver,et al.  Transcription factor‐mediated lineage switching reveals plasticity in primary committed progenitor cells , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[3]  M F Greaves,et al.  Regulation of the myeloperoxidase enhancer binding proteins Pu1, C-EBP alpha, -beta, and -delta during granulocyte-lineage specification. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Markovian Modeling of Gene-Product Synthesis , 1995 .

[5]  C. Lim,et al.  Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PLoS biology.

[6]  Ertugrul M. Ozbudak,et al.  Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Daniel Bilbao,et al.  FOG-1 and GATA-1 act sequentially to specify definitive megakaryocytic and erythroid progenitors , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[8]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[9]  K. Akashi,et al.  GATA-1 converts lymphoid and myelomonocytic progenitors into the megakaryocyte/erythrocyte lineages. , 2003, Immunity.

[10]  J. Raser,et al.  Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control , 2005, Science.

[11]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[12]  T. Enver,et al.  Do stem cells play dice? , 1998, Blood.

[13]  J. Skotheim,et al.  Commitment to a cellular transition precedes genome-wide transcriptional change. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[14]  Gabriel Kolle,et al.  A Continuum of Cell States Spans Pluripotency and Lineage Commitment in Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2009, PloS one.

[15]  F. Tang,et al.  Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[16]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization , 2010, Bioinform..

[17]  Nacho Molina,et al.  Mammalian Genes Are Transcribed with Widely Different Bursting Kinetics , 2011, Science.

[18]  D. Larson,et al.  Single-RNA counting reveals alternative modes of gene expression in yeast , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[19]  Timm Schroeder,et al.  Instruction of lineage choice by hematopoietic cytokines , 2009, Cell cycle.

[20]  David Botstein,et al.  Evaluating Gene Expression Dynamics Using Pairwise RNA FISH Data , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  Carl W. Miller,et al.  Regulation of gene expression of myeloperoxidase during myeloid differentiation , 1988, Journal of cellular physiology.

[22]  S. Orkin,et al.  Development of hematopoietic cells lacking transcription factor GATA-1. , 1995, Development.

[23]  Daniel R. Larson,et al.  A single molecule view of gene expression. , 2009, Trends in cell biology.

[24]  A. Migliaccio,et al.  Interleukin-3 and erythropoietin cooperate in the regulation of the expression of erythroid-specific transcription factors during erythroid differentiation. , 2007, Experimental hematology.

[25]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Characterization of transcriptional networks in blood stem and progenitor cells using high-throughput single-cell gene expression analysis , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  Stuart H. Orkin,et al.  An early haematopoietic defect in mice lacking the transcription factor GATA-2 , 1994, Nature.

[27]  S Meyers,et al.  PEBP2/CBF, the murine homolog of the human myeloid AML1 and PEBP2 beta/CBF beta proto-oncoproteins, regulates the murine myeloperoxidase and neutrophil elastase genes in immature myeloid cells , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization (smFISH) of C. elegans worms and embryos. , 2012, WormBook : the online review of C. elegans biology.

[29]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[30]  Elaine Dzierzak,et al.  GATA-2 Plays Two Functionally Distinct Roles during the Ontogeny of Hematopoietic Stem Cells , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[31]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  Functional Heterogeneity of Embryonic Stem Cells Revealed through Translational Amplification of an Early Endodermal Transcript , 2010, PLoS biology.

[32]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[33]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[34]  Carsten Peterson,et al.  Inferring rules of lineage commitment in haematopoiesis , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[35]  M. Selbach,et al.  Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control , 2011, Nature.

[36]  T. Enver,et al.  A GATA-2/estrogen receptor chimera functions as a ligand-dependent negative regulator of self-renewal. , 1999, Genes & development.

[37]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[38]  M. Greaves,et al.  Multilineage gene expression precedes commitment in the hemopoietic system. , 1997, Genes & development.

[39]  J. Nichols,et al.  Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development , 2007, Nature.

[40]  R. Singer,et al.  Transcriptional Pulsing of a Developmental Gene , 2006, Current Biology.

[41]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[42]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[43]  Tariq Enver,et al.  Haploinsufficiency of GATA-2 perturbs adult hematopoietic stem-cell homeostasis. , 2005, Blood.

[44]  Patrick S. Stumpf,et al.  Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[45]  Milos Pekny,et al.  Defining cell populations with single-cell gene expression profiling: correlations and identification of astrocyte subpopulations , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[46]  Tariq Enver,et al.  High GATA-2 expression inhibits human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell function by effects on cell cycle. , 2009, Blood.

[47]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Functional roles for noise in genetic circuits , 2010, Nature.

[48]  Timm Schroeder,et al.  Imaging stem-cell-driven regeneration in mammals , 2008, Nature.

[49]  岩崎 浩己,et al.  GATA-1 converts lymphoid and myelomonocytic progenitors into the megakaryocyte/erythrocyte lineages , 2006 .

[50]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray data , 2002, Bioinform..

[51]  S. Quake,et al.  An Information Theoretic, Microfluidic-Based Single Cell Analysis Permits Identification of Subpopulations among Putatively Homogeneous Stem Cells , 2011, PloS one.

[52]  Min Ye,et al.  Myeloid or lymphoid promiscuity as a critical step in hematopoietic lineage commitment. , 2002, Developmental cell.