ICIS Paper: Methodological Issues in Experimental IS Research: Experiences and Recommendations

Within the last ten years the use of experimental methodology in information systems (IS) research has substantially increased. However, despite our experience with experimentation, studies continue to suffer from methodological problems. These problems have led to an accumulation of conflicting results in several areas of IS research. Moreover, future research studies will keep producing contradictory results unless researchers begin to answer questions of task and measurement validity before reporting their experimental findings. This article discusses common methodological problems in experimental IS studies and, through a description of a series of graphics experiments at the University of Minnesota, illustrates the particularly acute problem of low internal validity. Suggestions are offered to experimental IS researchers on how some of these common problems can be alleviated or even avoided, particularly in studies on the use of managerial graphics.

[1]  S. Michael Handbook in research and evaluation , 1971 .

[2]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance , 1980 .

[3]  Howard G. Schutz,et al.  An Evaluation of Formats for Graphic Trend Displays—Experiment II1 , 1961 .

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Some MIS Design Variables , 1977, MIS Q..

[5]  R. W. Driver,et al.  The Influence of Computer Graphics on the Recall of Information , 1983, MIS Q..

[6]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Use of Computer-Based Graphics in Decision Making , 1981 .

[7]  R. Powers,et al.  The presentation of statistical information , 1963 .

[8]  R. F. Powers,et al.  MisProject Management: Myths, Opinions, and Reality , 1973 .

[9]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[10]  F. E. Croxton,et al.  Graphic Comparisons by Bars, Squares, Circles, and Cubes , 1932 .

[11]  G. Huber Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much ADO About Nothing? , 1983 .

[12]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[13]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Howard G. Schutz,et al.  An Evaluation of Methods for Presentation of Graphic Multiple Trends—Experiment III1 , 1961 .

[15]  Peter Wright The harassed decision maker: Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence. , 1974 .

[16]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Visual recognition memory for complex configurations , 1971 .

[17]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  CONTINUITY IN MIS/DSS LABORATORY RESEARCH: THE CASE FOR A COMMON GAMING SIMULATOR* , 1983 .

[18]  James A. Senn,et al.  Research in Management Information Systems: The Minnesota Experiments , 1977 .

[19]  John I. Reynolds Cases Which Meet the Students' Needs. , 1976 .

[20]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  COMPUTER GRAPHICS AS DECISION AIDS: DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH* , 1984 .

[21]  G. L. Grace Application of empirical methods to computer-based system design. , 1966, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Impact of Color Graphic Report Formats on Decision Performance and Learning , 1983, ICIS.

[23]  A. Milton Jenkins,et al.  MIS design variables and decision making performance: A simulation experiment , 1983 .

[24]  Wilbur Schramm,et al.  How accurately are different kinds of graphs read? , 1954 .

[25]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[26]  Andrew P. Sage,et al.  Behavioral and Organizational Considerations in the Design of Information Systems and Processes for Planning and Decision Support , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[27]  Frederick E. Croxton,et al.  Bar Charts versus Circle Diagrams , 1927 .

[28]  Hirotaka Takeuchi,et al.  New Promise of Computer Graphics , 1980 .

[29]  William Remus,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Graphical and Tabular Data Presentations on Decision Making , 1984 .

[30]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays , 1981 .

[31]  Jan Stuart. Prokop An investigation of the effects of computer graphics on executive decision-making in an inventory control environment , 1969 .

[32]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Tabular and Graphic Data Presentation , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[33]  Jan Bell,et al.  The Effect of Presentation Form on the Use of Information in Annual Reports , 1984 .

[34]  L. Carter,et al.  An experiment on the design of tables and graphs used for presenting numerical data. , 1947, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[36]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DIMENSIONALITY OF THE CONCEPT OF INFORMATION , 1978 .

[37]  Jawaid Abdul Ghani,et al.  The effects of information representation and modification on decision performance , 1981 .

[38]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[39]  J. N. Washburne An experimental study of various graphic, tabular, and textual methods of presenting quantitative material , 1927 .

[40]  Edward J. Lusk,et al.  The Effect of Cognitive Style and Report Format on Task Performance: The MIS Design Consequences , 1979 .

[41]  Blake Ives,et al.  Graphical User Interfaces for Business Information Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[42]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[43]  Leon H Nawrocki Alpha-Numeric Versus Graphic Displays in a Problem-Solving Task , 1972 .