Response-reinforcement learning is dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activation in the nucleus accumbens core.

The nucleus accumbens, a site within the ventral striatum, is best known for its prominent role in mediating the reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse such as cocaine, alcohol, and nicotine. Indeed, it is generally believed that this structure subserves motivated behaviors, such as feeding, drinking, sexual behavior, and exploratory locomotion, which are elicited by natural rewards or incentive stimuli. A basic rule of positive reinforcement is that motor responses will increase in magnitude and vigor if followed by a rewarding event. It is likely, therefore, that the nucleus accumbens may serve as a substrate for reinforcement learning. However, there is surprisingly little information concerning the neural mechanisms by which appetitive responses are learned. In the present study, we report that treatment of the nucleus accumbens core with the selective competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5; 5 nmol/0.5 microl bilaterally) impairs response-reinforcement learning in the acquisition of a simple lever-press task to obtain food. Once the rats learned the task, AP-5 had no effect, demonstrating the requirement of NMDA receptor-dependent plasticity in the early stages of learning. Infusion of AP-5 into the accumbens shell produced a much smaller impairment of learning. Additional experiments showed that AP-5 core-treated rats had normal feeding and locomotor responses and were capable of acquiring stimulus-reward associations. We hypothesize that stimulation of NMDA receptors within the accumbens core is a key process through which motor responses become established in response to reinforcing stimuli. Further, this mechanism, may also play a critical role in the motivational and addictive properties of drugs of abuse.

[1]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  R. Wise,et al.  A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. , 1987, Psychological review.

[3]  G. Di Chiara,et al.  Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  B. Hoebel,et al.  Feeding and hypothalamic stimulation increase dopamine turnover in the accumbens , 1988, Physiology & Behavior.

[5]  T. Robbins,et al.  The effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the nucleus accumbens on spatial learning and extinction in the rat , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[6]  R. Sutherland,et al.  The role of the fornix/fimbria and some related subcortical structures in place learning and memory , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  A. D. Smith,et al.  Convergence of hippocampal and dopaminergic input onto identified neurons in the nucleus accumbens of the rat. , 1989, Journal of chemical neuroanatomy.

[8]  A. D. Smith,et al.  The neural network of the basal ganglia as revealed by the study of synaptic connections of identified neurones , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  M. Packard,et al.  Lesions of the caudate nucleus selectively impair "reference memory" acquisition in the radial maze. , 1990, Behavioral and neural biology.

[10]  S. Sesack,et al.  In the rat medial nucleus accumbens, hippocampal and catecholaminergic terminals converge on spiny neurons and are in apposition to each other , 1990, Brain Research.

[11]  M. Uno,et al.  Long-term potentiation of the amygdalo-striatal synaptic transmission in the course of development of amygdaloid kindling in cats , 1991, Neuroscience Research.

[12]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociable roles of the ventral, medial and lateral striatum on the acquisition and performance of a complex visual stimulus-response habit , 1991, Behavioural Brain Research.

[13]  M. Packard,et al.  Dissociation of hippocampus and caudate nucleus memory systems by posttraining intracerebral injection of dopamine agonists , 1991 .

[14]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Double dissociation of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on acquisition of two water maze tasks: further evidence for multiple memory systems. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  A. Kelley,et al.  NMDA receptors mediate the behavioral effects of amphetamine infused into the nucleus accumbens , 1992, Brain Research Bulletin.

[16]  R. Morris,et al.  The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  D. S. Zahm,et al.  On the significance of subterritories in the “accumbens” part of the rat ventral striatum , 1992, Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Albin,et al.  Localization of striatal excitatory amino acid binding site subtypes to striatonigral projection neurons , 1992, Brain Research.

[19]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[20]  E. Nestler,et al.  Drug addiction: A model for the molecular basis of neural plasticity , 1993, Neuron.

[21]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Synaptic Plasticity in an In Vitro Slice Preparation of the Rat Nucleus Accumbens , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  W. Schultz,et al.  Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  C. Cepeda,et al.  Neuromodulatory actions of dopamine in the neostriatum are dependent upon the excitatory amino acid receptor subtypes activated. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  M. Gallagher,et al.  The amygdala complex: multiple roles in associative learning and attention. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Malenka,et al.  Simultaneous LTP of non-NMDA- and LTD of NMDA-receptor-mediated responses in the nucleus accumbens , 1994, Nature.

[26]  X.-T. Hu,et al.  MK-801 prevents alterations in the mesoaccumbens dopamine system associated with behavioral sensitization to amphetamine , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  A M Graybiel,et al.  The basal ganglia and adaptive motor control. , 1994, Science.

[28]  A. Graybiel,et al.  Responses of tonically active neurons in the primate's striatum undergo systematic changes during behavioral sensorimotor conditioning , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  Robert C. Malenka,et al.  Synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus: LTP and LTD , 1994, Cell.

[30]  R. Kötter Postsynaptic integration of glutamatergic and dopaminergic signals in the striatum , 1994, Progress in Neurobiology.

[31]  H. Fibiger,et al.  Dopaminergic correlates of motivated behavior: importance of drive , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  Maldonado-Irizarry Cs,et al.  Excitatory amino acid receptors within nucleus accumbens subregions differentially mediate spatial learning in the rat. , 1995 .

[33]  J. Penney,et al.  The functional anatomy of disorders of the basal ganglia , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[34]  J. Wickens,et al.  Dopamine reverses the depression of rat corticostriatal synapses which normally follows high-frequency stimulation of cortex In vitro , 1996, Neuroscience.

[35]  S. Hyman,et al.  Amphetamine and Dopamine-Induced Immediate Early Gene Expression in Striatal Neurons Depends on Postsynaptic NMDA Receptors and Calcium , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  T. Robbins,et al.  Neurobehavioural mechanisms of reward and motivation , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[37]  H. Groenewegen,et al.  The nucleus accumbens: gateway for limbic structures to reach the motor system? , 1996, Progress in brain research.