Size Precedes View: Developmental Emergence of Invariant Object Representations in Lateral Occipital Complex

Although object perception involves encoding a wide variety of object properties (e.g., size, color, viewpoint), some properties are irrelevant for identifying the object. The key to successful object recognition is having an internal representation of the object identity that is insensitive to these properties while accurately representing important diagnostic features. Behavioral evidence indicates that the formation of these kinds of invariant object representations takes many years to develop. However, little research has investigated the developmental emergence of invariant object representations in the ventral visual processing stream, particularly in the lateral occipital complex (LOC) that is implicated in object processing in adults. Here, we used an fMR adaptation paradigm to evaluate age-related changes in the neural representation of objects within LOC across variations in size and viewpoint from childhood through early adulthood. We found a dissociation between the neural encoding of object size and object viewpoint within LOC: by age of 5–10 years, area LOC demonstrates adaptation across changes in size, but not viewpoint, suggesting that LOC responses are invariant to size variations, but that adaptation across changes in view is observed in LOC much later in development. Furthermore, activation in LOC was correlated with behavioral indicators of view invariance across the entire sample, such that greater adaptation was correlated with better recognition of objects across changes in viewpoint. We did not observe similar developmental differences within early visual cortex. These results indicate that LOC acquires the capacity to compute invariance specific to different sources of information at different time points over the course of development.

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[2]  N. Berthier,et al.  What do two-year-olds understand about hidden-object events? , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[3]  T. Nealey,et al.  Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to responses in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque monkey , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Routes to Object Constancy: Implications from Neurological Impairments of Object Constancy , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  N Mai,et al.  Disturbance of movement vision after bilateral posterior brain damage. Further evidence and follow up observations. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Motion and shape perception in cerebral akinetopsia. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[8]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[10]  C. Furmanski,et al.  Perceptual learning in object recognition: object specificity and size invariance , 2000, Vision Research.

[11]  R. Campbell,et al.  High motion coherence thresholds in children with autism. , 2002, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[12]  W. Hayward After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Activation in Human MT/MST by Static Images with Implied Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[15]  W. Hayward,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence and Object Discriminability , 2000, Psychological science.

[16]  S. Kastner,et al.  Two hierarchically organized neural systems for object information in human visual cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Julie M. Hupp,et al.  Object recognition and attention to object components by preschool children and 4-month-old infants. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  A. Cowey,et al.  Regional cerebral correlates of global motion perception: evidence from unilateral cerebral brain damage. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[20]  G. Orban,et al.  Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. , 1993, Science.

[21]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age. , 2009, Developmental science.

[22]  E. Warrington,et al.  The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  S. Edelman,et al.  Cue-Invariant Activation in Object-Related Areas of the Human Occipital Lobe , 1998, Neuron.

[24]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[25]  T. Gliga,et al.  Development of a view-invariant representation of the human head , 2007, Cognition.

[26]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Cerebral visual motion blindness: transitory akinetopsia induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area V5 , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  A. Morland,et al.  The contribution of human cortical area V3A to the perception of chromatic motion: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[31]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Facing changes and changing faces in adolescence: A new model for investigating adolescent-specific interactions between pubertal, brain and behavioral development , 2012, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  Hisashi Tanigawa,et al.  A Motion Direction Map in Macaque V2 , 2010, Neuron.

[34]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Varieties of Object Constancy , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Emergence of global shape processing continues through adolescence. , 2009, Child development.

[36]  M. Montant,et al.  Phonological Activation in Pure Alexia , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[37]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  The representation of object viewpoint in human visual cortex , 2009, NeuroImage.

[38]  Kevin J. Riggs,et al.  Motion processing in autism: evidence for a dorsal stream deficiency , 2000, Neuroreport.

[39]  Stephen T. Hammett,et al.  Speed can go up as well as down at low contrast: Implications for models of motion perception , 2006, Vision Research.

[40]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[41]  Craig S. Chapman,et al.  The effect of disrupting the human magnocellular pathway on global motion perception , 2004, Vision Research.

[42]  Najib J Majaj,et al.  Binocular Integration of Pattern Motion Signals by MT Neurons and by Human Observers , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Vincent P Ferrera,et al.  Motion processing in macaque V4 , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  O. Braddick,et al.  What is Noise for the Motion System? , 1996, Vision Research.

[45]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Perceptual shape sensitivity to upright and inverted faces is reflected in neuronal adaptation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[46]  G. Orban,et al.  Attention to 3-D Shape, 3-D Motion, and Texture in 3-D Structure from Motion Displays , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.

[48]  S. Ullman Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[49]  Irving Biederman,et al.  One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.

[50]  Rebecca Lawson,et al.  Object Recognition under Sequential Viewing Conditions: Evidence for Viewpoint-Specific Recognition Procedures , 1994, Perception.

[51]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  Michael Erb,et al.  Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  Michael J Tarr,et al.  What defines a view? , 2001, Vision Research.

[54]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  The Feasibility of a Common Stereotactic Space for Children and Adults in fMRI Studies of Development , 2002, NeuroImage.

[55]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  Terry Caelli,et al.  Development of configural 3D object recognition , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[57]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition , 1995 .

[58]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of object agnosia: A case study , 2010 .

[59]  B. Treutwein Adaptive psychophysical procedures , 1995, Vision Research.

[60]  Green Bf Figure coherence in the kinetic depth effect. , 1961 .

[61]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Development of face processing. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[62]  G. Orban,et al.  Charting the Lower Superior Temporal Region, a New Motion-Sensitive Region in Monkey Superior Temporal Sulcus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Cortical connections of visual area MT in the macaque , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[64]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[65]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.

[66]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[67]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Cortical representations of symbols, objects, and faces are pruned back during early childhood. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[68]  G. Orban,et al.  Human Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Separation and Integration of Shape and Motion Cues in Biological Motion Processing , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Common and differential effects of attentive fixation on the excitability of parietal and prestriate (V4) cortical visual neurons in the macaque monkey , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[70]  D M Levi,et al.  Development of Vernier Acuity in Childhood , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[71]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint , 1998, Vision Research.

[72]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision , 1989, Nature.

[73]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Models of object recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[74]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Differential Effects of Viewpoint on Object-Driven Activation in Dorsal and Ventral Streams , 2002, Neuron.

[75]  Amy Needham,et al.  The role of surface discontinuity and shape in 4-month-old infants' object segregation , 2010 .

[76]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion , 1976, Vision Research.

[77]  T. Wilcox Object individuation: infants’ use of shape, size, pattern, and color , 1999, Cognition.

[78]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[79]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words , 2008, Current Biology.

[80]  N. Mai,et al.  Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[81]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq269 ‘‘What’ ’ Precedes ‘‘Which’’: Developmental Neural Tuning in Face- and Place-Related Cortex , 2011 .

[82]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A new anatomical landmark for reliable identification of human area V5/MT: a quantitative analysis of sulcal patterning. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[83]  E. Darcy Burgund,et al.  Comparison of functional activation foci in children and adults using a common stereotactic space , 2003, NeuroImage.

[84]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[85]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[86]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The roles of “face” and “non-face” areas during individual face perception: Evidence by fMRI adaptation in a brain-damaged prosopagnosic patient , 2008, NeuroImage.

[87]  T. Albright,et al.  Motion coherency rules are form-cue invariant , 1992, Vision Research.

[88]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5 , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[89]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Direction selectivity in V1 of alert monkeys: evidence for parallel pathways for motion processing , 2007, The Journal of physiology.

[90]  G. Humphrey,et al.  Recognizing novel views of three-dimensional objects. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[91]  Georgios A Keliris,et al.  Neurons in macaque area V4 acquire directional tuning after adaptation to motion stimuli , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[92]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Linking form and motion in the primate brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[93]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 1993, Cerebral cortex.

[94]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[95]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories. , 2007, Developmental science.

[96]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  Disorder of higher visual function. , 2011, Current opinion in neurology.

[97]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[98]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional Analysis of V3A and Related Areas in Human Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[99]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[100]  E B Ciner,et al.  Stereoacuity Development: 6 Months to 5 Years. A New Tool for Testing and Screening , 1996, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[101]  T. Schenk,et al.  Visual motion perception after brain damage: I. Deficits in global motion perception , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[102]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in children , 1982, Vision Research.

[103]  Deborah Giaschi,et al.  The effect of dot speed and density on the development of global motion perception , 2012, Vision Research.

[104]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[105]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity to motion signals in extrastriate area MST of the macaque monkey , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[106]  Alexander Grunewald,et al.  Neural Correlates of Structure-from-Motion Perception in Macaque V1 and MT , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[107]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[108]  Deborah Giaschi,et al.  Conscious visual abilities in a patient with early bilateral occipital damage. , 2003 .

[109]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Impairments in part–whole representations of objects in two cases of integrative visual agnosia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[110]  S. Zeki,et al.  Cerebral akinetopsia (visual motion blindness). A review. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[111]  J. Enns,et al.  Relations between covert orienting and filtering in the development of visual attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[112]  Bettina Sorger,et al.  Human Cortical Object Recognition from a Visual Motion Flowfield , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[113]  David L Sheinberg,et al.  A method for the real-time rendering of formless dot field structure-from-motion stimuli. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[114]  H. Kesten Accelerated Stochastic Approximation , 1958 .

[115]  N. Logothetis,et al.  View-dependent object recognition by monkeys , 1994, Current Biology.

[116]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  What a difference a parameter makes: A psychophysical comparison of random dot motion algorithms , 2009, Vision Research.

[117]  A. Thiele,et al.  Neuronal synchrony does not correlate with motion coherence in cortical area MT , 2003, Nature.

[118]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  The development of vernier acuity in human infants , 1991, Vision Research.

[119]  M. Tarr,et al.  To What Extent Do Unique Parts Influence Recognition Across Changes in Viewpoint? , 1995 .

[120]  J. Anthony Movshon,et al.  Dissociation of Neuronal and Psychophysical Responses to Local and Global Motion , 2011, Current Biology.

[121]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Developmental neuroimaging of the human ventral visual cortex , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[122]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[123]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[124]  Karl R. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Cortical networks for motion processing: Effects of focal brain lesions on perception of different motion types , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[125]  M. Corballis,et al.  Winding one's ps and qs: mental rotation and mirror-image discrimination. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[126]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[127]  I. Kovács,et al.  Late maturation of visual spatial integration in humans. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[128]  Shude Zhu,et al.  A Motion Direction Preference Map in Monkey V4 , 2013, Neuron.

[129]  R. Andersen,et al.  Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons , 1998, Nature.

[130]  A. Cowey,et al.  Comparing the visual deficits of a motion blind patient with the visual deficits of monkeys with area MT removed , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[131]  R. Day,et al.  Infant Perception of the Invariant Size of Approaching and Receding Objects , 1981 .

[132]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Regionally-specific adaptation dynamics in human object areas , 2008, NeuroImage.

[133]  I. Murakami,et al.  Neural Correlates of Induced Motion Perception in the Human Brain , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[134]  Karl R. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Interaction of motion and color in the visual pathways , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[135]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Processing Shape, Motion and Three-dimensional Shape-from-motion in the Human Cortex , 2003 .

[136]  R. B. Stark Development of the face. , 1973, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[137]  D. Gentner,et al.  Developmental changes in children's understanding of the similarity between photographs and their referents. , 2008, Developmental science.

[138]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[139]  T D Albright,et al.  Visual motion perception. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[140]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[141]  Norihiro Sadato,et al.  Role of the superior temporal region in human visual motion perception. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[142]  J. Movshon,et al.  Motion Integration by Neurons in Macaque MT Is Local, Not Global , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[143]  G. Rees,et al.  Normal form from biological motion despite impaired ventral stream function , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[144]  D. Besner Visual Pattern Recognition: Size Preprocessing Re-Examined , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[145]  G. Orban,et al.  The Retinotopic Organization of the Human Middle Temporal Area MT/V5 and Its Cortical Neighbors , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[146]  P. Jolicoeur A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[147]  Paul H. Garthwaite,et al.  On comparing a single case with a control sample: An alternative perspective , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[148]  Daphne Maurer,et al.  Developmental changes in the processing of hierarchical shapes continue into adolescence. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[149]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Neuroanatomical correlates of biological motion detection , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[150]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[151]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Notice Warning concerning Copyright Restrictions Cognitive Neuropsychology Pure Alexia and Covert Reading: Evidence from Stroop Tasks Pure Alexia and Covert Reading: Evidence from Stroop Tasks , 2022 .

[152]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[153]  P. McLeod,et al.  Preserved and Impaired Detection of Structure From Motion by a 'Motion-blind" Patient , 1996 .

[154]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Dorsal and ventral stream sensitivity in normal development and hemiplegia , 2002, Neuroreport.

[155]  M. Tarr,et al.  Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[156]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Responses of neurons in the parietal and temporal visual pathways during a motion task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[157]  R. Klein,et al.  Familiarity and attention: Does what we know affect what we notice? , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[158]  D. Heeger,et al.  Motion Opponency in Visual Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[159]  P. Jolicoeur The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[160]  R. Kimchi,et al.  What does visual agnosia tell us about perceptual organization and its relationship to object perception? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[161]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Independent representation of parts and the relations between them: evidence from integrative agnosia. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[162]  I. Biederman,et al.  Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .

[163]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[164]  A. Slater,et al.  Size constancy at birth: newborn infants' responses to retinal and real size. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[165]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  fMRI Activity Patterns in Human LOC Carry Information about Object Exemplars within Category , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[166]  C. Mash,et al.  Multidimensional shape similarity in the development of visual object classification. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[167]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: Pure alexia is not pure , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[168]  R. Malach,et al.  The topography of high-order human object areas , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[169]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual processing in monkey extrastriate cortex. , 1987, Annual review of neuroscience.

[170]  Joel Z. Leibo,et al.  The dynamics of invariant object recognition in the human visual system. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[171]  L A Thompson,et al.  Developmental changes in the effect of dimensional salience on the discriminability of object relations. , 1998, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[172]  E. Rolls,et al.  INVARIANT FACE AND OBJECT RECOGNITION IN THE VISUAL SYSTEM , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[173]  J. Hennig,et al.  The Processing of First- and Second-Order Motion in Human Visual Cortex Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[174]  W. Newsome,et al.  Deciding about motion: linking perception to action , 1997, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[175]  A. Saygin Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[176]  Kathrin Cohen Kadosh,et al.  Task-dependent Activation of Face-sensitive Cortex: An fMRI Adaptation Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[177]  S. Zeki Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[178]  Russell L. De Valois,et al.  PII: S0042-6989(00)00210-8 , 2000 .

[179]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[180]  C. Genovese,et al.  A functional MRI study of face recognition in patients with prosopagnosia , 2001, Neuroreport.

[181]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.