The impact of statistical adjustment on economic profiles of interventional cardiologists.

[1]  D. McClish,et al.  Results of Report Cards for Patients with Congestive Heart Failure Depend on the Method Used To Adjust for Severity , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  W. Manning,et al.  The Unreliability of Individual Physician “Report Cards” for Assessing the Costs and Quality of Care of a Chronic Disease , 2000 .

[3]  A. Agresti,et al.  Strategies for comparing treatments on a binary response with multi-centre data. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  K. Anstrom,et al.  Evolving trends in interventional device use and outcomes: results from the National Cardiovascular Network Database. , 2000, American heart journal.

[5]  E. DeLong,et al.  Acute and long-term cost implications of coronary stenting. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Rutledge,et al.  A methodology for choosing a physician profiling system: the case of First Option Health Plan. , 1999, Journal of health care finance.

[7]  E. Rocha.  Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection. , 1998, Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology.

[8]  V. Lawrence,et al.  How you look determines what you find: severity of illness and variation in blood transfusion for hip fracture. , 1998, The American journal of medicine.

[9]  E. Hannan,et al.  Identification of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient data collection. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  A M Epstein,et al.  Rolling down the runway: the challenges ahead for quality report cards. , 1998, JAMA.

[11]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing risk-adjustment methods for provider profiling. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  P. Heidenreich,et al.  Impact of the operating physician on costs of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  R. Matthews,et al.  Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcome and hospital costs for low-volume and high-volume operators. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  E. Topol,et al.  Analysis and comparison of operator-specific outcomes in interventional cardiology. From a multicenter database of 4860 quality-controlled procedures. , 1996, Circulation.

[15]  David P Miller,et al.  In-hospital cost of percutaneous coronary revascularization. Critical determinants and implications. , 1995, Circulation.

[16]  S. Salem-Schatz,et al.  The case for case-mix adjustment in practice profiling. When good apples look bad. , 1994 .

[17]  E L Hannan,et al.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. , 1994, JAMA.

[18]  Welch Wp,et al.  Physician profiling. An analysis of inpatient practice patterns in Florida and Oregon. , 1994 .

[19]  J P Kassirer,et al.  The use and abuse of practice profiles. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  W P Welch,et al.  Physician profiling. An analysis of inpatient practice patterns in Florida and Oregon. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.