High-Fidelity Modeling of Shift-Variant Focal-Spot Blur for High-Resolution CT

Dedicated application-specific CT systems are popular solutions to high-resolution clinical needs. Some applications, such as mammography and extremities imaging, require spatial resolution beyond current capabilities. Thorough understanding of system properties may help tailor system design, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms to improve image quality. Using a high-fidelity measurement model, we analyze the effects of shift-variant focal spot blur due to depth-dependence and anode angulation on image quality throughout the three-dimensional field of view of a simulated extremities scanner. A model of the shift-variant blur associated with this device is then incorporated into a Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) algorithm, which is then compared to FDK and MBIR with simpler blur models at select locations throughout the field of view. We show that shift-variant focal spot blur leads to location-dependent imaging performance. Furthermore, changing the orientation of the X-ray tube alters this spatial dependence. The analysis suggests methods to improve imaging performance based on specific image quality needs. The results also demonstrate that image quality can be improved by combining accurate blur modeling with MBIR. Specifically, across the entire field of view, MBIR with shift-variant blur modeling yielded the best image quality, followed by MBIR with a shift-invariant blur model, MBIR with an identity blur model, and FDK, respectively. These results suggest a number of opportunities for the optimization of imaging system performance in the hardware setup, the imaging protocol, and the reconstruction approach. While the high-fidelity models used here are applied using the specifications of a dedicated extremities imaging system, the methods are general and may be applied to optimize imaging performance in any CT system.

[1]  Patrick J. La Rivière,et al.  Correction for Resolution Nonuniformities Caused by Anode Angulation in Computed Tomography , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Combining Ordered Subsets and Momentum for Accelerated X-Ray CT Image Reconstruction , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  J. Boone,et al.  Evaluation of the spatial resolution characteristics of a cone-beam breast CT scanner. , 2006, Medical physics.

[4]  R. Leahy,et al.  Accurate geometric and physical response modelling for statistical image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[5]  Yurii Nesterov,et al.  Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions , 2005, Math. Program..

[6]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Modeling Shift-Variant X-Ray Focal Spot Blur for High-Resolution Flat-Panel Cone-Beam CT. , 2016, Conference proceedings. International Conference on Image Formation in X-Ray Computed Tomography.

[7]  J. Webster Stayman,et al.  Penalized-Likelihood Reconstruction With High-Fidelity Measurement Models for High-Resolution Cone-Beam Imaging , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Wojciech Zbijewski,et al.  Technical assessment of a prototype cone-beam CT system for imaging of acute intracranial hemorrhage. , 2016, Medical physics.

[9]  Wojciech Zbijewski,et al.  Multiresolution iterative reconstruction in high-resolution extremity cone-beam CT. , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  D. Gilland,et al.  Implementation of simultaneous attenuation and detector response correction in SPECT , 1988 .

[11]  Lingyun Chen,et al.  Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose. , 2007, Medical physics.

[12]  Jeffrey H Siewerdsen,et al.  Nonlinear statistical reconstruction for flat-panel cone-beam CT with blur and correlated noise models , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[13]  J. Siewerdsen,et al.  Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging. , 2014, Radiology.